RichieNextel305 Posted February 26 Author Share Posted February 26 (edited) I just don’t think he’s ready yet. That and the fact that the opening was on his off side. I don’t think they wanted to throw him into the fire too deep if they felt he wasn’t ready, which they evidently felt since it was a quick cup of coffee. Since being back down, he has gotten time on that side. I think they want to let him get a full year in the AHL before getting him ready for a go next season here. Edited February 26 by RichieNextel305 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieNextel305 Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 (edited) This after this was reported earlier today by Pagnotta: Edited February 29 by RichieNextel305 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieNextel305 Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 Smoke means fire. Verbeek being there means a deal is being discussed. I wonder if it’s one of Henrique/Vatrano or possibly both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaveByRichter35 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 This trade deadline needs to fucking get here and go already. I am so tired of hearing Doc's voice in my head yelling "Henrique! Its over!" every time we talk about him in here. Its nauseating. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 25 minutes ago, RichieNextel305 said: Smoke means fire. Verbeek being there means a deal is being discussed. I wonder if it’s one of Henrique/Vatrano or possibly both? Odd. Kakko is on line 1 for the game. Verbeek in the building. Vatrano is on the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Vatrano, yes. Henrique, go fuck yourself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieNextel305 Posted February 29 Author Share Posted February 29 (edited) Vatrano and Henrique, both with retention, for Phils soul. Done deal. e5. Edited February 29 by RichieNextel305 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 I'll nuke this place on the way out, just to spite you all. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Just now, Phil said: Vatrano, yes. Henrique, go fuck yourself. How about both with salary retention (can you retain on 2 players in the same trade?)straight up for Kakko? Thus leaving cap room to add even more depth like another C, RW and D. Though I'd prefer Miller for Zegras instead. (Yes then trade for a backfill for 3rd pair while sliding Gustafsson up to 2nd pairing). Come onnnn Miller, score a goal tonight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 How about fucking no to Henrique, ever, for any reason? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 minute ago, Phil said: How about fucking no to Henrique, ever, for any reason? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 If they trade for him, I won't even cheer if he scores. I'll react like this: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 6 minutes ago, Phil said: If they trade for him, I won't even cheer if he scores. I'll react like this: You do you. I'll be hoping Toronto calls it back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Gonna be Edstrom, 2nd, 3rd for Henrique Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 minute ago, BrooksBurner said: You do you. I'll be hoping Toronto calls it back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Just now, BrooksBurner said: Gonna be Edstrom, 2nd, 3rd for Henrique Alright, I'm adding a puke emoji, and calling it Henrique. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddious Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 We gonna win a cup with quick and Henrique. Are we even gonna count it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 (edited) 2 hours ago, Phil said: Alright, I'm adding a puke emoji, and calling it Henrique. While you're in there might I suggest renaming the from Chytil to Gingras, I mean Chytil may never be seen again, certainly not this year. #nameyourprice Edited February 29 by Scott 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 1 hour ago, The Dude said: Odd. Kakko is on line 1 for the game. Verbeek in the building. Vatrano is on the way. If they trade Kakko for vatrano, I’m quitting this team. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 26 minutes ago, Kevin said: If they trade Kakko for vatrano, I’m quitting this team. If they got Vatrano half-retained and a 2nd round pick, I wouldn't be mad. It's not what I would do, but I'd get it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lefty9 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 11 hours ago, Kevin said: If they trade Kakko for vatrano, I’m quitting this team. This is pretty much true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 11 hours ago, Kevin said: If they trade Kakko for vatrano, I’m quitting this team. Would be beyond shortsighted to trade a 22-year-old for a 30-year-old. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Yeah, I wouldn't do that either. I don't think they will if they do bring Vatrano back. I wouldn't rule out Kakko being dealt at some point this year or next, but part of a bigger deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddious Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 16 minutes ago, Pete said: Would be beyond shortsighted to trade a 22-year-old for a 30-year-old. I’m fine with moving on from kakko but I agree this isn’t the trade. Unless other assets are also coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lefty9 Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 Like two first rounders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now