Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Trading Panarin?


Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Br4d said:

How is Panarin -9 with 21 points in 16 games?

 

Something is totally not clicking here.

 

 

12 of his points are power play which has no bearing on +/-  That said he has 9 points 5 on 5, not to mention any goals for he was on the ice for he didn't have a point.  At minimum he's  on the ice for 18 goals against 5 on 5 in 16 games.  Obviously just unlucky.  You would seem that people would understand that not allowing goals is equally as valuable as scoring them.   It's great that he may score 100 points but if he's going to be on the ice for 100 against at 5 on 5 does that matter?  To some I guess not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Br4d said:

How is Panarin -9 with 21 points in 16 games?

 

Something is totally not clicking here.

 

 

Gotta look at the numbers. It's all right there.

 

His on ice save percentage is 84.91 which is shockingly bad, he's around 93% as a Ranger.

 

When he's out on the ice is when 53% of the teams HDCF occur.

 

When there's an alarmingly high number of pucks going into your net, and and alarmingly low number going in theirs despite the high quality of the chances....And it's not even the quarter pole...That's called "bad luck". When a guy who normally has an on ice save % of 93 is now at 85, and it's a handful of games in...it's an anomaly. 

 

Suggesting that a guy we signed 4 years ago and has 260 points in 200 games as a Ranger is now not worth his cap because of this stretch to start the season is just bananas.

 

 

Edited by Pete
Was confused on my stats.
  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Pete said:

Gotta look at the numbers. It's all right there.

 

His on ice save percentage is 84.91 which is shockingly bad, he's around 93% as a Ranger.

 

His on ice shooting percentage is 7.46% despite him shooting 15%+. Trocheck is around 3% and Laffy is at around 7. That's also shockingly bad.

 

When he's out on the ice is when 53% of the teams HDCF occur.

 

When there's an alarmingly high number of pucks going into your net, and and alarmingly low number going in theirs despite the high quality of the chances....And it's not even the quarter pole...That's called "bad luck". When a guy who normally has an on ice save % of 93 is now at 85, and it's a handful of games in...it's an anomaly. 

 

Suggesting that a guy we signed 4 years ago and has 260 points in 200 games as a Ranger is now not worth his cap because of this stretch to start the season is just bananas.

 

 

Its not that he’s not worth his cap, its that the team cant get better in other places because of the caphit. Im afraid to think who we’d havr to give up next offseason and the season after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CCCP said:

Its not that he’s not worth his cap, its that the team cant get better in other places because of the caphit. Im afraid to think who we’d havr to give up next offseason and the season after. 

You can say that about 4 to 5 other players on the team who aren't exceeding production and having the best years of their career here.

 

It's not that the point isn't valid, it's that the point is in all that valid about this particular player on this particular team as it relates to other players who are far more overpaid. 

Edited by Pete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pete said:

You can say that about 4 to 5 other players on the team who aren't exceeding production and having the best years of their career here.

 

It's not that the point isn't valid, it's that the point is in all that valid about this particular player on this particular team as it relates to other players who are far more overpaid. 

Except he is overpaid too.  He's wing and why anyone would pay $11.5M for any wing is the argument itself.  I get that is what he got based on the market.  My point is that is not the market I'm building my team from.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cupalife said:

Last year?

I don't even know what you're asking at this point.

 

Look, I appreciate having his talent, which he uses to produce accordingly with his pay grade. 

 

If you want to complain about him making too much, therefore we don't have cap to fix the other positions who DON'T do their jobs... Good luck with that. But so far, every unsubstantiated point you've thrown out there has been rebuffed pretty easily. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Aho 

Svechnikov

Werenski

Gaudreau

Hughes

Hichier

Barzal

Pastarnak

Marchand

McAvoy

Dahlin

Tage Thompson

Seider

Larkin

Barkov

M. Tkachuck

B. Tkachuck

Point

Kucherov

Hedman

Matthews

Kane

MacKinnon

Makar

Hintz

Robertson

Heiskanen

Kaprisov

Josi

Kyle Connor

McDavid

Draistl

Miller

Petterson

Eichel

Pietrangelo

 

All better than our $11.5M man

 

 

 

 

Edited by cupalife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artemi Panarin has a No Movement Clause and makes $11.5M a year.

 

Other NHL teams that can afford his cap hit: Anaheim Ducks, Buffalo Sabres, Arizona Coyotes

 

Other NHL teams with more than $4mil of cap space so we don't have to take crap contracts back: Detroit Red Wings, Chicago Blackhawks

 

We aren't getting shit for him unless we take mediocre contracts back, which you will then proceed to bitch about. The examples where the team getting a package for an individual player makes out better is...maybe Ottawa trading Karlsson, but Ottawa still sucks even with all of these new good players.

 

Not to mention, he's not the problem. The lack of a system is the problem. Without a player like Panarin, we don't sniff the playoffs. Even now we're in a fight for a wildcard spot. And the cap is going up. Plus he's not preventing us from signing anyone right now, or trading for anyone. We have deadline day cap space.

 

This argument is so fucking stupid.

Edited by Cash or Czech
  • Cheers 1
  • Keeps it 100 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cash or Czech said:

Artemi Panarin has a No Movement Clause and makes $11.5M a year.

 

Other NHL teams that can afford his cap hit: Anaheim Ducks, Buffalo Sabres, Arizona Coyotes

 

Other NHL teams with more than $4mil of cap space so we don't have to take crap contracts back: Detroit Red Wings, Chicago Blackhawks

 

We aren't getting shit for him unless we take mediocre contracts back, which you will then proceed to bitch about. The examples where the team getting a package for an individual player makes out better is...maybe Ottawa trading Karlsson, but Ottawa still sucks even with all of these new good players.

 

Not to mention, he's not the problem. The lack of a system is the problem. Without a player like Panarin, we don't sniff the playoffs. Even now we're in a fight for a wildcard spot. And the cap is going up. Plus he's not preventing us from signing anyone right now, or trading for anyone. We have deadline day cap space.

 

This argument is so fucking stupid.

You really think Panarin is going to buy into any kind of a defensive system, play any kind of a defensive game?  Im not so sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...