Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Trading Panarin?


Recommended Posts

Is it a possibility? Obviously things changed with drafting Kakko and Lafreniere.

 

I mean, maybe one day, but definitely not today. I think Lafreniere and Kakko need to become what we all think they're going to be, or at least look like they are well on their way, before we can trade away Panarin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no.

 

Talk about premature unless you're talking about throwing a few more nails into the window frame of the window where we become serious contenders that's not even all that close to being open yet.

 

Which is exactly why you want to trade him now, if the window isn?t even close to open, not so premature after all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm the Rangers I don't move panarin period. That kind of talent rarely comes around. If you want to give Lafreniere more ice team send Kreider packing. He's not worth the contract.

 

This. I would rather look to move Kreider and Trouba. I know Trouba doesn't affect the playing time of the young wingers but it would help to move cap space that will be a problem soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. I would rather look to move Kreider and Trouba. I know Trouba doesn't affect the playing time of the young wingers but it would help to move cap space that will be a problem soon enough.

 

I dont think Trouba finishes his contract here. As far as I'm concerned, Fox is the franchise defensemen and he's going to get paid. Miller and Lindgren will too.

 

Don?t make me smack you

 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vodka - trade high now? Waaaaay premature IMO. Maybe a year from now when these young pups gel then we have that talk. Over drinks. A few of them. If we?re on the cusp it?s worthy of a look. But in the meantime, where?s the lighter? LOL

 

I didn?t mean tomorrow but it?s certainly a conversation to be had by next season IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would too but I don?t think they will be able to. I just think you won?t see Kakko and (especially) Lafreniere develop with Panarin here, they are too much of the same, puck needs to be on their stick for them to be effective.

 

As far as developing Kakko and Laff, get rid of the coach and get one who agrees on developing the kids rather then playing dead Kreider.

Panarin would go on the first line while Laff can taken the second.

I think Panarin needs to be traded 2 years before his contract is over, I don?t see him slowing down as far as the points go. I do hate his game sometime, i think he needs to be more physical. Kind of like Buch showing this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...