Phil Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Same. I'm all for Burakovsky. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Yeah, they should be looking at all "change of scenery" candidates. But I'd put JT Miller in that category, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Still, such moves need to be secondary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.wiskers Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Burakovsky?Yes! Don?t know if it was posted somewhere else but Darren Dreger says the Jets have interest in Nash. Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Sort of. He said they phoned numerous GMs to talk about numerous pieces, of which Nash was one. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Shit, some legit NHL source said a player expected to be traded was asked to expand his list and said no. I immediately thought Nash - 'pet before reading the rumor they were interested. Hopefully that's the case, don't Need Dano, Petan and 58th pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 20, 2018 Author Share Posted February 20, 2018 Sort of. He said they phoned numerous GMs to talk about numerous pieces, of which Nash was one. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Its never good when you're calling and they aren't calling you. Get ready for disappointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatfrancesa Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Bob McKenzie said it’s shaping up to be a buyers market. Not good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Just means returns will be a little reserved. And perhaps a McDonagh trade won't happen until the draft instead. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Well, we knew it was going to be such, hence why no one was too interested in prematurely pursuing options. Still, the Rangers have some valuable assets Nash - goal scorer, penalty killer, either wing, 1st line - 4th line, does the little things, veteran, playoff experience Grabner - can score, speed, penalty killer, 2nd - 4th liner, either wing Holden - depth dman, all situations, both sides, any pair Desharnais - depth forward, incredibly affordable, averages .5 ppg Doesnt mean we will get huge returns, but we have some of the more valuable assets. Plus, there's always McDonagh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Lothbrok Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 FYI, Valiquette said in a tweet about a half hour ago that he thinks McDonagh ends up in Tampa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.wiskers Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Who do you guys think we can legitimately get from TB Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Falco Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 FYI, Valiquette said in a tweet about a half hour ago that he thinks McDonagh ends up in Tampa. He misses his bud, G. That'll make what? 4 ex Rangers on that team now should it happen.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.wiskers Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Toronto just traded Eric Fehr. They are saying Toronto now has 6.7 mil. in cap room and 48 contracts. They are supposedly looking for Center depth and defense. If that means anything to anyone. Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Where did you see that they were looking for center depth? They need a RHD, and then potentially an upgrade on one of the wings to add a vet or a versatile forward that can score and play in all situations - but their wings have really been stepping it up, recently. I could see them improving on their 3rd/4th line C, but we dont have anyone to displace their top 3 Cs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Who do you guys think we can legitimately get from TB Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk 2018 first, Conditional 2019 first (if TBL win Cup), Raddysh/Katchouk, Howden, and probably a roster player. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giacomin Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Who do you guys think we can legitimately get from TB , I think along with all playoff teams, TB wants to add w/o losing roster players. If Sergachev is off limits... Low - Foote, Howden and their 1st Medium - Foote, Howden, their 1st and 2019 2nd I want - Foote, Howden, their 1st and Gorton's choice of Raddysh or Katchouk I may prefer Fabbro, Lilegren or Dermott as D prospects, but Foote was drafted 14 overall for a reason. Supposedly super instinctive defensively, excellent hockey IQ. doesn't get caught out of position and rarely gets beat. Good size and good upside. Need a Dman from somewhere and he is the best in their system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.wiskers Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Josh: this was just 1. SB Nation Pension Plan Puppets has an article Frank Seravalli @frank_seravalli ? Feb 16 Sounds like #Leafs and #Stars among teams who have inquired with #RedWings on C Luke Glendening. He would be a nice fit for TOR, played for Babcock in DET, but Wings aren't going to give him away. 77 179 305 Elliotte Friedman had this to say 11. Toronto certainly has interest in Luke Glendening, but I?m not sure how the Maple Leafs can do it for a draft pick. They?re at 48 contracts, two shy of the max, and they wouldn?t want to get back to 50. It?s likely they discussed Nikita Soshnikov as part of the trade before the winger was sent to St. Louis, so it makes sense that maybe Josh Leivo could be part of this. The other key would be a draft pick, and the two sides are a few rounds apart on agreeing. Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.wiskers Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Sports net.ca Eliotte Friedman had this: 15. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette?s Jason Mackey reported on Michael Grabner as the Penguins? target, which makes a lot of sense as he fits their speedy winger profile. Mackey wondered if the Rangers would refuse to trade with the Penguins but I don?t think that?s the case. If Daniel Sprong was available, why wouldn?t someone consider it? 10. Don?t believe Boston?s addition of Nick Holden prevents them from adding another current Rangers defender. Question is whether or not the Bruins are willing to take the plunge. Can?t pin it down, but there also appears to be Western Conference interest in Ryan McDonagh Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 I had a proposal sending grabs to Pitt for Hagelin plus pick, then Hagelin, Zuccarello, picks, prospect (high value) for Karlsson :thumbs: #90srangersproblems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giacomin Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Sports net.ca Eliotte Friedman had this: 15. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Jason Mackey reported on Michael Grabner as the Penguins’ target, which makes a lot of sense as he fits their speedy winger profile. Mackey wondered if the Rangers would refuse to trade with the Penguins but I don’t think that’s the case. If Daniel Sprong was available, why wouldn’t someone consider it? Three Pitt papers mentioned their interest in Grabs. Talk is for a #1, saw Pen fans comment they want Grabs, but want to keep their top pick and Sprong. I'll take either. Seems like some of the smart fast teams have interest in Grabs like the Pens, Bruins and Jets. Rangers should not settle for a #2 + later pick. A 1st or equivalent top prospect is fair. He'll be an awesome rental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.wiskers Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Aah, Yeah! I would ask for Sprong & at least a 2nd. Pitt has to overpay, their in our division. Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatfrancesa Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 No thanks to Sprong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 He misses his bud, G. That'll make what? 4 ex Rangers on that team now should it happen.. McD, Callahan and Girardi can save on co-pays by going in the MRI machine together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 I had a proposal sending grabs to Pitt for Hagelin plus pick, then Hagelin, Zuccarello, picks, prospect (high value) for Karlsson :thumbs: #90srangersproblems Don't get the Karlsson thing. He may never be the same player due to injuries and he isn't that young.And he will not be reasonable cap wise. Would go against everything Gorton's letter says they're trying to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.