GDT 2021-22 NHL Trade Deadline: All in, Bay Bay!

[RichieNextel305]

19 minutes ago, Pete said:

What a horribly composed tweet. 

I’ve read it, re-read it and read it again and still have no clue what he’s writing.

[SaveByRichter35]

Same.

[Keirik]

Watch, we end up trading for Jimmy Vesey. 

[SaveByRichter35]

2 hours ago, Keirik said:

Watch, we end up trading for Jimmy Vesey. 

[Kevin]

Canucks might be buyers now?

[LindG1000]

https://theathletic.com/3127806/2022/02/14/what-were-hearing-about-the-rangers-as-trade-season-approaches-j-t-miller-vitali-kravtsov-nils-lundkvist-more/

 

• The price for Miller is pick, prospect, player; not sure Nils + 1st is enough. Canucks keen to move him given the high interest and high return
• Chiarot is the same as the price for Savard last deadline (1st + 4th)
• Lehkonen is currently a 1st; likely to drop.
• Wings might hold depth solutions for Rangers, notes Namestnikov, Leddy, Staal, Greiss (as a Georgiev replacement if needed)
• For some reason, goes into Patrick Kane and then acknowledges it's kind of premature
• Kravtsov still the bluest chip

All for Marc Staal coming back as a 6/7

[Keirik]

Wonder if Dallas would be interested in Holtby for Geo straight up. Price is a wash really and Oettinger is rfa after the season and Holtby gone. 

 

[LindG1000]

37 minutes ago, Keirik said:

Wonder if Dallas would be interested in Holtby for Geo straight up. Price is a wash really and Oettinger is rfa after the season and Holtby gone. 

 

Not really sure what that does for us to be honest; Geo has more value liquidated into picks instead of flipped for a marginally better UFA goalie.

[Long live the King]

1 hour ago, G1000 said:

https://theathletic.com/3127806/2022/02/14/what-were-hearing-about-the-rangers-as-trade-season-approaches-j-t-miller-vitali-kravtsov-nils-lundkvist-more/

 

• The price for Miller is pick, prospect, player; not sure Nils + 1st is enough. Canucks keen to move him given the high interest and high return
• Chiarot is the same as the price for Savard last deadline (1st + 4th)
• Lehkonen is currently a 1st; likely to drop.
• Wings might hold depth solutions for Rangers, notes Namestnikov, Leddy, Staal, Greiss (as a Georgiev replacement if needed)
• For some reason, goes into Patrick Kane and then acknowledges it's kind of premature
• Kravtsov still the bluest chip

All for Marc Staal coming back as a 6/7

 

So Miller for 1st, Nils (prospect), and Chytil (player).  Already a yes on Names

[josh]

Stay away from those montreal deals.

 

 

[Keirik]

26 minutes ago, G1000 said:

Not really sure what that does for us to be honest; Geo has more value liquidated into picks instead of flipped for a marginally better UFA goalie.

I’m just thinking that if there is an injury to Shesty down the stretch or even in the playoffs, a guy with a ton of experience would be a better replacement than Geo would.

 

  I don’t think k you are ever getting much for Geo. He’s at best a 2nd round pick to a desperate team like the Oilers and probably worth a 3rd in the offseason. I don’t even think there is a huge market for Geo. He’s not really a consistent option for a playoff team. 

[Kevin]

1 hour ago, Keirik said:

Wonder if Dallas would be interested in Holtby for Geo straight up. Price is a wash really and Oettinger is rfa after the season and Holtby gone. 

 

I think Holtby is hotter garbage than Georgiev at this point.  I'd look elsewhere.

[Keirik]

2 minutes ago, Kevin said:

I think Holtby is hotter garbage than Georgiev at this point.  I'd look elsewhere.

Hmm…I mean 
 

Geo 21/22

17 starts 7-7-2 2.99 .898%

 

Holtby 21/22

21 starts  9-10-1 2.78 .912%

Holtby this year projects mostly to his career averages. Last year he was trash. 

[Kevin]

11 minutes ago, Keirik said:

Hmm…I mean 
 

Geo 21/22

17 starts 7-7-2 2.99 .898%

 

Holtby 21/22

21 starts  9-10-1 2.78 .912%

Holtby this year projects mostly to his career averages. Last year he was trash. 

I saw him live...granted it was only one game but his positioning was horrible, he was chasing plays outside of the net, and overall seemed to have lost some reaction speed.  

[Keirik]

8 minutes ago, Kevin said:

I saw him live...granted it was only one game but his positioning was horrible, he was chasing plays outside of the net, and overall seemed to have lost some reaction speed.  

I hear ya but the body of work, while not outstanding or anything, isn’t exactly hot garbage either. 
 

I’ve read a lot of talk about getting Halak with his .903% 

 

im not sure that’s a better option than Holtby

[Kevin]

1 minute ago, Keirik said:

I hear ya but the body of work, while not outstanding or anything, isn’t exactly hot garbage either. 
 

I’ve read a lot of talk about getting Halak with his .903% 

 

im not sure that’s a better option than Holtby

If we're talking about coming in and playing as the #1 if Shesty gets hurt again, I'd stick with Geo.  If we're talking about playing a guy to give Shesty a night off, I'd go with Holtby.  

[Keirik]

1 minute ago, Kevin said:

If we're talking about coming in and playing as the #1 if Shesty gets hurt again, I'd stick with Geo.  If we're talking about playing a guy to give Shesty a night off, I'd go with Holtby.  

Really ? Even with Holtby having a career .926% in the playoffs and a cup? 

[BrooksBurner]

Kane at 50% retention through next year would be amazing.

[Sod16]

To keep Geo, a team must be ready to qualify him at $2.75, a price no one will probably be willing to pay.  Hence, I see him as having zero trade value.

[Blue Heaven]

Is Mark Scheifele available?  Boomer Esaison casually threw out his name this morning that the Rangers should get him.  Boomer has been on the ball a few times in the past about Rangers acquiring players at the deadline.  

[Kevin]

9 minutes ago, Blue Heaven said:

Is Mark Scheifele available?  Boomer Esaison casually threw out his name this morning that the Rangers should get him.  Boomer has been on the ball a few times in the past about Rangers acquiring players at the deadline.  

He’s a stud. I’d take him in a second. But it would probably cost a fortune.

[Kevin]

17 hours ago, Keirik said:

Really ? Even with Holtby having a career .926% in the playoffs and a cup? 

Yes. Those numbers are old. He doesn’t look even remotely close to that guy that led the caps. I’m not a Geo fan at all but I would look elsewhere for the upgrade

[Keirik]

2 hours ago, Kevin said:

Yes. Those numbers are old. He doesn’t look even remotely close to that guy that led the caps. I’m not a Geo fan at all but I would look elsewhere for the upgrade

I guess we can agree to disagree. He’s never had a sub . 900% in the playoffs and in his last three playoff years from 17/18-19/20 he had .922% (cup), .914%, and .906% 

 

   Again, we are talking about a backup who wouldn’t be seeing playoffs unless something went wrong. 

[LindG1000]

14 hours ago, Sod16 said:

To keep Geo, a team must be ready to qualify him at $2.75, a price no one will probably be willing to pay.  Hence, I see him as having zero trade value.

 

In the past few years, teams have paid far more for far worse. Carter Hart, Joonas Korpisalo, Mikko Koskinen, Matt Murray, Linus Ullmark - there are endless examples of goalies making far more for worse than what Georgiev's putting up.

[jsm7302]

Is take  vet backup (Holtby) into the playoffs over Geo. Id also like JT Miller back. 

 

Grab those two and let's waltz into the playoffs and keep our fingers crossed.