The Dude Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 7 hours ago, RangersIn7 said: I agree with you. And it’s not cause Brodz is or has played poorly. Cause he hasn’t. Brodz is a hockey player. But they need another C. And it isn’t Wennberg. They have the cap space to add another quality top-6 and a bottom-6 player. Thats what they need. That C doesn’t need to unseat Brodz. He just needs to be there as insurance. Meh. The C needs to be better than Brodzinski. Brodzinski is the insurance. Wennberg isn't the type of player I was expecting them to target. But I guess if he comes retained and for absolutely nothing more than an AHLer..... I guess Drury has to do it. He's a 35-40 point center... Although he doesn't play a style I want to add, you have to think the market is pretty dry or just not at the Rangers price point. Wennberg would be an improvement over Brodzinski (don't bring recent fancy stats into it. He's a 35- 40 point player. That's what Chytil was--). But it's not the guy we want. If that's all that's out there. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 A very weird way to say Frank Vatrano. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I just read on The Athletic that St Louis might move Buchnevich.. I'd trade picks, prospects and the soul of Adam Henrique to get PB back.. Figure the cap hit for next year out over the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWantsTheCup Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 14 minutes ago, Flynn said: I just read on The Athletic that St Louis might move Buchnevich.. I'd trade picks, prospects and the soul of Adam Henrique to get PB back.. Figure the cap hit for next year out over the summer. I've heard rumors about Buchnevich too, but don't see why he would get traded. The Blues currently are in a playoff spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsm7302 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 The one that got away ..... It's too late. Stay the course with Othmann; he will be the next Buch for us. We just need patience. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 4 minutes ago, RJWantsTheCup said: I've heard rumors about Buchnevich too, but don't see why he would get traded. The Blues currently are in a playoff spot. Yeah.. makes no sense.. But if they are going to be idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slobberknocker Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 i heard a wild ass rumor that the rangers were going to go after tom wilson... probably not true given the contract but has anyone else heard this? thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 40 minutes ago, Slobberknocker said: i heard a wild ass rumor that the rangers were going to go after tom wilson... probably not true given the contract but has anyone else heard this? thanks. Heard from where? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I can't imagine they would even consider taking on that 7 year contract that starts next season @ 6.5 per. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 22 Author Share Posted February 22 1 hour ago, Scott said: I can't imagine they would even consider taking on that 7 year contract that starts next season @ 6.5 per. Wouldn't stop me. Kreider-Zibanejad-Wilson... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Come on guys. Sources. Can't just say you heard it on a podcast and not share a link like - Links or it didn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 4 minutes ago, The Dude said: Come on guys. Sources. Can't just say you heard it on a podcast and not share a link like - Links or it didn't happen. You're too lazy to click the link even if it was supplied to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Just now, Pete said: You're too lazy to click the link even if it was supplied to you. Right. I forgot. It's OK to just name a podcast and send a link to a list of every single podcast the show has done. Because it isn't at all possible to send a link for a certain episode and give a timestamp. It just can't be done. To expect such a thing is preposterous. It's only 2024. We don't have the technology. So, go on everyone. Just say you heard what you want to happen on a podcast, then when questioned about it, call the one questioning you lazy because they don't want to listen to 200 episodes of said podcast to find what it is that YOU are talking about. Lazy. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 (edited) 8 minutes ago, The Dude said: Right. I forgot. It's OK to just name a podcast and send a link to a list of every single podcast the show has done. Because it isn't at all possible to send a link for a certain episode and give a timestamp. It just can't be done. To expect such a thing is preposterous. It's only 2024. We don't have the technology. So, go on everyone. Just say you heard what you want to happen on a podcast, then when questioned about it, call the one questioning you lazy because they don't want to listen to 200 episodes of said podcast to find what it is that YOU are talking about. Lazy. So you think I should go back and listen to the entire episode to give you a timestamp instead of you just accepting that what I said actually came from the podcast? For YOU of all people? Get the fuck out of here. This shit is so tired already. I don't have shit to prove to you. You haven't posted a source ever in your life. But I have to spoon feed you information? If you want to continue being uninformed, that's your business. If I thought for a second you might actually listen to it, and become informed, I might have thought about doing it. But you're the kind of dude who will listen to it and then just make some crazy shit up as a reason not to believe the information that's right in front of you. I posted the link to all the podcasts because you obviously need an education on a lot of this shit. I was doing you a favor. But you don't want to be educated, so continue to do what you do and I'll continue the chuckle at the hot takes. Edited February 22 by Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 27 minutes ago, Pete said: So you think I should go back and listen to the entire episode to give you a timestamp instead of you just accepting that what I said actually came from the podcast? For YOU of all people? Get the fuck out of here. This shit is so tired already. I don't have shit to prove to you. You haven't posted a source ever in your life. But I have to spoon feed you information? If you want to continue being uninformed, that's your business. If I thought for a second you might actually listen to it, and become informed, I might have thought about doing it. But you're the kind of dude who will listen to it and then just make some crazy shit up as a reason not to believe the information that's right in front of you. I posted the link to all the podcasts because you obviously need an education on a lot of this shit. I was doing you a favor. But you don't want to be educated, so continue to do what you do and I'll continue the chuckle at the hot takes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 Guys, get back on the topic of discussing the point rather than the person. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 11 minutes ago, Keirik said: Guys, get back on the topic of discussing the point rather than the person. Thanks. Noooo let them go! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 28 minutes ago, Vodka Drunkenski said: Noooo let them go! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 1 minute ago, Keirik said: Your kid just woke up. Ok guys you can go again before he gets back 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 24 minutes ago, Keirik said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 (edited) 8 hours ago, The Dude said: Edited February 23 by Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 21 minutes ago, Pete said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 21 minutes ago, The Dude said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieNextel305 Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 (edited) @Keirik Might wanna change the thread title. And Keirik might wanna change his shorts. I imagine this made him smile. Just a little bit. Gourde would be a tremendous add. Edited February 23 by RichieNextel305 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts