LindG1000 Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindG1000 Posted July 8, 2022 Author Share Posted July 8, 2022 Just one thought here: Torts. DeAngelo. One locker room. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Only question is who's shipped out faster, Torts or ADA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 7 minutes ago, LindG1000 said: Just one thought here: Torts. DeAngelo. One locker room. 3 minutes ago, Pete said: Only question is who's shipped out faster, Torts or ADA. This is going to be one hell of a season in Philly!! I can't wait to see the drama already!!! LOL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Fuck. Nice chunk. now Strome should take the same deal with the rangers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Good deal for all involved IMO, especially DeAngelo who had to be concerned about earnings potential after everything. The losers here are obviously the Rangers. Just to recap: Georgiev fights DeAngelo. Rangers annex DeAngelo after ultimatum broken, and get nothing for him except dead cap space. Hurricanes sign DeAngelo for close to a min contract. Hurricanes trade DeAngelo for more than the Rangers got for Georgiev. Canes running circles around the Rangers on asset management. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Tony will be fine there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 21 minutes ago, Keirik said: Tony will be fine there. Quote the Tortorella: "Nevermore!" If this isn't the powder keg waiting to blow.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 43 minutes ago, rmc51 said: Good deal for all involved IMO, especially DeAngelo who had to be concerned about earnings potential after everything. The losers here are obviously the Rangers. Just to recap: Georgiev fights DeAngelo. Rangers annex DeAngelo after ultimatum broken, and get nothing for him except dead cap space. Hurricanes sign DeAngelo for close to a min contract. Hurricanes trade DeAngelo for more than the Rangers got for Georgiev. Canes running circles around the Rangers on asset management. I mean, sure, but this was always going to be the case. The Rangers were never going to get anything for him. Not on that deal with multiple years left after he fought a teammate. I'd have been fine with them sacking both players, for the record, but to lament the lack of a return is silly. His value was zero. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 He was also never going to be P/G defenseman here. Carolina rehabbed his career, sheltered him and hid his atrocious D, and gave him PP time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valriera Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Nice deal for everyone there and no, nobody cares about rangers history with this guy. my favorite part about that history was where we made him completely meaningless in a seven game series this year 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long live the King Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 1 hour ago, rmc51 said: Canes running circles around the Rangers on asset management. Scoreboard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 27 minutes ago, Pete said: He was also never going to be P/G defenseman here. Carolina rehabbed his career, sheltered him and hid his atrocious D, and gave him PP time. I wish the Rangers were capable of hiding poor defensive defensemen. Couldn’t even get through one year of Nemeth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, rmc51 said: I wish the Rangers were capable of hiding poor defensive defensemen. Couldn’t even get through one year of Nemeth. Hard to hide when you can't score, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 good news is it'll be a short walk home for Tony when Torts tells him to fuck off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sod16 Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 I'd say that the chances are about two in three that Tony will work out ok with Torts and one in three that it will be War of the Worlds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 6 hours ago, LindG1000 said: Just one thought here: Torts. DeAngelo. One locker room. tick,tick,tick........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Bugg said: tick,tick,tick........ Can't imagine Torts all of the sudden handling him getting walked all over the ice in the D-zone well no matter what he does at the other end. Actually can't imagine Torts adapting to much as the game continues to evolve and I love the guy but his comments last year about the game becoming too skilled is rather dated whether we like the way the game is evolving or not, that horse has left the barn. Gonna love watching him and how it plays out. Edited July 8, 2022 by jsrangers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 Remember how much the rangers got when they traded DeAngelo?? Oh, a signed DeAngelo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted July 8, 2022 Share Posted July 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, josh said: Remember how much the rangers got when they traded DeAngelo?? Oh, a signed DeAngelo. Yes. But we don't care about future Hartford assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted July 9, 2022 Share Posted July 9, 2022 I still think some of you guys are way off on this one. Zero chance this was done without Torts blessing in the first place. He’s going to be fine there. Torts rath is not towards players with deficiencies. It’s towards players with indifferences. ADA has flaws but effort isn’t one of them. Torts will put ADA in roles that suit his strengths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted July 9, 2022 Share Posted July 9, 2022 16 minutes ago, Keirik said: I still think some of you guys are way off on this one. Zero chance this was done without Torts blessing in the first place. He’s going to be fine there. Torts rath is not towards players with deficiencies. It’s towards players with indifferences. ADA has flaws but effort isn’t one of them. Torts will put ADA in roles that suit his strengths. I agree. Torts will love ADA’s passion and love for the game. Sure, they are bound to butt heads a bit when you have two big personalities, but I don’t think it’s going to be the problem most are thinking. This makes the Flyers better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 9, 2022 Share Posted July 9, 2022 24 minutes ago, Keirik said: I still think some of you guys are way off on this one. Zero chance this was done without Torts blessing in the first place. He’s going to be fine there. Torts rath is not towards players with deficiencies. It’s towards players with indifferences. ADA has flaws but effort isn’t one of them. Torts will put ADA in roles that suit his strengths. 1. This move is made by the GM. The coach is irrelevant to the conversation. I seriously doubt the GM is phoning his first year coach to ask "are you OK with this move?" 2. The rest, I agree in principle, but Torts heavily values players who defend, and Tony does not do this. I don't know that they'll clash personally much, but repeated blown coverage that costs the Flyers games could cause a rift if Tony gets benched over any of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted July 9, 2022 Share Posted July 9, 2022 1 minute ago, Phil said: I agree in principle, but Torts heavily values players who defend, and Tony does not do this. I don't know that they'll clash personally much, but repeated blown coverage that costs the Flyers games could cause a rift if Tony gets benched over any of them. It’s possible, but the Torts of today eats the lunch of guys like Laine that just purely don’t give a crap. I actually think Torts might be the kind of guy that gets the best out of ADA in his own zone. we shall see I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now