Phil Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Mobile link: Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Lets kick off this rebuild with a 34 year old dude playing in Russia for the last 5 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long live the King Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Lets kick off this rebuild with a 34 year old dude playing in Russia for the last 5 years. In the KHL he plays less less games per year, and is far less physical. His age doesn't scare me. 2-3 year deal is fine by me. Kovalchuk will be a good mentor for Buch and Svechnikov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 9, 2018 Author Share Posted April 9, 2018 I mean, I can smell your sarcasm from here, but yes. This is how proper rebuilds are done. Especially if they deal Zuccarello and other veterans this summer. You'll need someone around to teach the young guys. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Thinking must be they will have the cap room for 2 years and OFFENSE. Precludes any reunion with Grabner. But really what's the rush; at the end of the playoffs there will be a glut of free agents who would be more useful and cheaper.As to his talent, is a 34/35 year old guy going to be the offensive player he was with NJD? ANd Kovalachuk appears to not want to go anywhere else in the NHL. Heck, he's already got a white away jersey even. Smells a lot like a lot of old guy signings from the bad old days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosenvold Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Hmm, yeah - this really puts the strategic direction of the Rangers into question. Right now everything should be geared towards rebuilding for at least the rest of 2018 with the only acceptable temptation being John Tavares. The only plan I can think of, is one where Kovalchuk mentors Buch for half a year and is then flipped to a contender at the deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Remember the last time we acquired an old, enigmatic, moody, selfish, overpaid, former goal scorer during a "rebuild"? Seemed to work out pretty well for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillyb Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Will there still be room for Tavares and Karlsson? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long live the King Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Will there still be room for Tavares and Karlsson? lol Tavares, yes. Especially if they trade one of Kreider/Zucc and a few of the RFA's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long live the King Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Hmm, yeah - this really puts the strategic direction of the Rangers into question. Right now everything should be geared towards rebuilding for at least the rest of 2018 with the only acceptable temptation being John Tavares. The only plan I can think of, is one where Kovalchuk mentors Buch for half a year and is then flipped to a contender at the deadline. For 2/3 years there's no harm in Kovalchuk. Only young forwards that need a spot next year are Chytil and Andersson. To me Kovalchuk means the following things are more likely: 1) First step in the pitch to Tavares 2) One of Hayes/Zib will be traded to make room for Tavares 3) 2 of Kreider, Zucc, Spooner, and Names will be traded https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/652346 While the D ^here isn't much changed, if you get some combo of a bounce back year from Skjei, improvement from Pionk, a healthy Shatty, and a healthy ADA then you're better off than this past year. What you're really doing though is buying a year for Lindgren, Hajek, and Day (yes Dunny) to play in the A, plus one year closer to Rykov, plus I'm sure at least one of our 1st's this year is a D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 someone needs to make me a Russian Meddling sig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 9, 2018 Author Share Posted April 9, 2018 Remember the last time we acquired an old, enigmatic, moody, selfish, overpaid, former goal scorer during a "rebuild"? Seemed to work out pretty well for us. This. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Remember the last time we acquired an old, enigmatic, moody, selfish, overpaid, former goal scorer during a "rebuild"? Seemed to work out pretty well for us. Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatfrancesa Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Just because it worked with jagr means nothing when it comes to Kovalchuk. At two years it’s not a big deal. From what I’ve heard through different stories is that his teammates love him. Brodeur praised him. Nothing about him excites me but as long as signing him doesn’t change the process in which this team goes about building in on with it. One more thing he cannot get a ntc. That is a deal breaker. I would give him another year before that. If that is a demand then it’s a hard pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valriera Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 I wouldn’t have a problem with this. It’s not like we’re breaking the bank for him and let’s not forget that on the ice he was full value for his ridiculous contract before his unceremonious departure. 6m could end up being a bargain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torontonyr Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 I'm okay with this. It also informs me that Shestyorkin and Rykov will be coming over during this contract period. What it suggests to me is that we're 100% in on Tavares or some other upgrading deal that sends a Kreider or Hayes-like player + a prospect and/or a pick for a young certifiable upgrade. This isn't signing Jagr in 2018. This is signing Jagr in 2006. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torontonyr Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Now, we all know what needs to happen next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Who? He scored the most in a season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 If this can turn into a 1st round pick down the line, I?m all for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torontonyr Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Poor Fast has to change his number... AGAIN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slobberknocker Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 no compensation needs to be paid to the devils? i thought they would still have his rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torontonyr Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 no compensation needs to be paid to the devils? i thought they would still have his rights. He honored the length of his contract IIRC. If he had returned during the contract it'd been a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRanger11 Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Don't see the problem with this. He obviously wanted to be a Ranger pretty bad if he's agreeing to a deal nearly 3 months before he can sign and without knowing who the coach will be. It doesn't "hurt the rebuild" if Buch goes from playing with McCleod to Kovalchuk (AV is gone, but still). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew a Penalty Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 I'm fine with it. He can still play. Get Gusev's rights from Vegas while you're at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torontonyr Posted April 9, 2018 Share Posted April 9, 2018 Don't see the problem with this. He obviously wanted to be a Ranger pretty bad if he's agreeing to a deal nearly 3 months before he can sign and without knowing who the coach will be. It doesn't "hurt the rebuild" if Buch goes from playing with McCleod to Kovalchuk (AV is gone, but still). Kovy gets a bad wrap. I've always seen his exit from NJ as more of a mutually beneficial arrangement than anything due to the circumvention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.