Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Way Too Early Trade Deadline Targets


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, BrooksBurner said:


Yes. He’s at an age where the odds are likely he declines. There’s a gap the size of Mike Tyson’s front teeth between ROR and Goodrow though, so he can decline a healthy amount and still be a better option. A cap diff of $900k isn’t that much.

 

I don’t really want to go to bat for it. I just wouldn’t rule it out as a legitimate option.

That’s where I’m at too.

 

Im not hung ho about it. 
But I totally agree that he’s still a great player and it’s something at least to look at

 

But it’s still just a talking point to me

 

I drew the line between him and Goodrow only because of the money.

 

  • TroCheckmark 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rangers don't need expensive 30-somethings right now.  They've got a bunch of those.

 

They need to promote from within and let the kids grow into the structure.  We're not that far away from age-related declines in a few important players.

  • Keeps it 100 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Br4d said:

The Rangers don't need expensive 30-somethings right now.  They've got a bunch of those.

 

They need to promote from within and let the kids grow into the structure.  We're not that far away from age-related declines in a few important players.

They’re going to need and want a vet or two 

But it’s safer to get a rental

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Br4d said:

The Rangers don't need expensive 30-somethings right now.  They've got a bunch of those.

 

They need to promote from within and let the kids grow into the structure.  We're not that far away from age-related declines in a few important players.

 

For the playoffs? Definitely not. They'll get guys who can help now. Most of their kids need time to grow in the AHL this year. Cuylle really was the only option. He was a full year ahead of Othmann.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Phil said:

 

For the playoffs? Definitely not. They'll get guys who can help now. Most of their kids need time to grow in the AHL this year. Cuylle really was the only option. He was a full year ahead of Othmann.

 

This is why the Rangers are always competitive and never win a cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Phil said:

 

For the playoffs? Definitely not. They'll get guys who can help now. Most of their kids need time to grow in the AHL this year. Cuylle really was the only option. He was a full year ahead of Othmann.

They’ll go the route of a couple of vets.

 

As they should.

 

Like every other team at the deadline, they’ll be shopping for veteran depth on D for certain. A Justin Braun-type or whatever.

 

And they’ll probably be looking for a forward with some versatility and/or scoring punch. 

 

 

  • Keeps it 100 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Br4d said:

 

This is why the Rangers are always competitive and never win a cup.

 

If they're adding any more kids this year, it'll be before the deadline, not at it. What team has ever promoted players instead of making a trade for sure-fire NHL players and won?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RangersIn7 said:

They’ll go the route of a couple of vets.

 

As they should.

 

Like every other team at the deadline, they’ll be shopping for veteran depth on D for certain. A Justin Braun-type or whatever.

 

And they’ll probably be looking for a forward with some versatility and/or scoring punch. 

 

 

 

Exactly, and very likely no one who will stand in the way of any of the kids we're hoping will take jobs as soon as next year. Guys like Othmann.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deadline deals are the GM's chance to play Fantasy Hockey GM.

 

The way the Rangers do it, never making the deals with any intent to re-sign the players, is the worst kind of Fantasy GM.

 

Seriously, if Tarasenko and Kane led to  one and out with the Devils what is the chance that any deadline deal is really going to improve the team when it comes to crunch time?

 

The 21-22 deals were effective - against teams playing backup goalies in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Phil said:

 

Exactly, and very likely no one who will stand in the way of any of the kids we're hoping will take jobs as soon as next year. Guys like Othmann.

Yeah, but if they acquired a forward with some term, it doesn’t necessarily block Othmann.

Rosters change and a piece or two can move on, so it shouldn’t stop them from getting a guy that can help if it’s the right guy at the right price.

 

It’s not a static thing. And Drury is smart and seeks to have a good handle on things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Br4d said:

Deadline deals are the GM's chance to play Fantasy Hockey GM.

 

The way the Rangers do it, never making the deals with any intent to re-sign the players, is the worst kind of Fantasy GM.

 

Seriously, if Tarasenko and Kane led to  one and out with the Devils what is the chance that any deadline deal is really going to improve the team when it comes to crunch time?

 

The 21-22 deals were effective - against teams playing backup goalies in the playoffs.

It’s easy to look back in the rear view mirror and say the Rangers shouldn’t have made those deals last year. But the simple fact of the matter is there isn’t a GM in the sport who wouldn’t have done exactly what Drury did in either situation. He got Tarasenko for next to nothing with 50% retained and got Kane for literally nothing while only being on the hook for 25%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Keirik said:

I think you're going to have to clarify what you mean by this 

 

The Rangers always seem to be built to win a round or three in the playoffs and then depart gracefully when a more coherent team shows up.  This was true in the Lundqvist years and it is true today.

 

The franchise never has operated on the principle of draft well, develop your players, acquire some long-term vets (meaning acquire them and *keep* them) and prosper.  This is the model most cup winners adopt

 

Even the cup winner in '94 was mainly built around players the Rangers traded for or signed as vet FA's.  It's like the franchise is playing a constant game of Lotto and when we get lucky they maybe get to the 3rd round but there's always a better team waiting for us somewhere in the playoffs and then we go down.

 

What I'm trying to say is the Rangers model for winning only wins big when you get the biggest players and keep them.  This rental boolsheet is for the birds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year's team was up 2-0 against the MIGHTY NJ Devils....who got trounced by a Carolina team we handled pretty well during the season.

 

I'm still going with, "If we had Lavvy back there, we're probably still hung over from the parade"!   That team was pretty awesome.

  • Like 1
  • Believe 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ozzy said:

Last year's team was up 2-0 against the MIGHTY NJ Devils....who got trounced by a Carolina team we handled pretty well during the season.

 

I'm still going with, "If we had Lavvy back there, we're probably still hung over from the parade"!   That team was pretty awesome.

It’s a series that a great coach wins.

  • Keeps it 100 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Br4d said:

Deadline deals are the GM's chance to play Fantasy Hockey GM.

 

The way the Rangers do it, never making the deals with any intent to re-sign the players, is the worst kind of Fantasy GM.

 

Seriously, if Tarasenko and Kane led to  one and out with the Devils what is the chance that any deadline deal is really going to improve the team when it comes to crunch time?

 

The 21-22 deals were effective - against teams playing backup goalies in the playoffs.

Nothing under GG matters now. Forget what you thought you knew. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's pretend it's free agency next summer for a minute. Assuming there's good faith that the team will be a serious contender next season, I don't think anyone would be upset if this team added a strong, veteran C/W on a 3 year contract w/o trade protection at 4.5 per.

 

This isn't about blocking youth. It's about Lafreniere being the only legitimate RW on the team. There's plenty of space on that right side.

Edited by BrooksBurner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrooksBurner said:

Let's pretend it's free agency next summer for a minute. Assuming there's good faith that the team will be a serious contender next season, I don't think anyone would be upset if this team added a strong, veteran C/W on a 3 year contract w/o trade protection at 4.5 per.

 

This isn't about blocking youth. It's about Lafreniere being the only legitimate RW on the team. There's plenty of space on that right side.

But that's taking it in an extreme vacuum. ROR isn't a winger. He's a center that plays wing at times. He's also someone that plays over 20 minutes per game. Plus we have a Trocheck on this team who I would consider is our "version" of ROR. 

 

If we signed a 33 year old high mileage center to 4m+ until he's 36 with the idea of him playing out of position, I'm sure plenty would be scratching their heads. We did with the cheaper Goodrow but we understood it as helping this team learn how to compete for a cup. We don't need that right now. We have plenty of leaders. We have guys that have won including our head coach. 

 

 What we need are a couple of guys to round out the jagged pieces, not another round peg. Just my opinion at least.  

  • Cheers 1
  • Keeps it 100 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...