Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Can Blake Wheeler Be Traded?


Phil

Recommended Posts

I'm asking realistically, not literally. I don't fault Drury at all for trying to make this work, but it just isn't. He is so slow and just doesn't seem to fit anywhere in the lineup. Waivers is also an option, but I feel like a veteran player like this, Drury's more likely to look for a trade to spare him the embarrassment.

 

I just don't know where. I feel like it has to be back out West where his size and lack of speed are mitigated some. He's really drowning in the Metro because nearly every team is built on high-end speed. Maybe the Wild?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Phil said:

I'm asking realistically, not literally. I don't fault Drury at all for trying to make this work, but it just isn't. He is so slow and just doesn't seem to fit anywhere in the lineup. Waivers is also an option, but I feel like a veteran player like this, Drury's more likely to look for a trade to spare him the embarrassment.

 

I just don't know where. I feel like it has to be back out West where his size and lack of speed are mitigated some. He's really drowning in the Metro because nearly every team is built on high-end speed. Maybe the Wild?

It will be difficult.

We have to assume that every other team has seen him play. 
Also, he does have an NTC. Not sure the details, but it’s there, so that’s another obstacle.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say not really. Not while things are rolling. There are more likely to just start platooning him. Given his age and him on such a small contract, it might affect their future ability to get a veteran in the same situation if they think there is no respect given towards uprooting a family to NYC at the tail end of a career like that. 

 

If we were to take a huge nosedive in the standings?  I guess maybe that changes things a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's below the threshold of cap penalty if you send him down to the AHL, just saying. I get being classy to a veteran, but in today's NHL where Drury is literally calling up and sending down guys each day to make the cap work, you do what you've gotta do. Wheeler hasn't shown he can keep up in the East. You can try to do him the courtesy of exploring options, but at the end of the day Drury has a team to run efficiently.

Edited by Cash or Czech
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Keirik said:

I'd say not really. Not while things are rolling. There are more likely to just start platooning him. Given his age and him on such a small contract, it might affect their future ability to get a veteran in the same situation if they think there is no respect given towards uprooting a family to NYC at the tail end of a career like that. 

 

If we were to take a huge nosedive in the standings?  I guess maybe that changes things a bit. 

Get what you're saying, but then you have Quick and Bonino to counter that. They are playing, Boneroo got elevated, because he was doing his job. Wheeler isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt there's anyone who would want him at this point. 

 

I think the potential upside of keeping him very much outweighs getting rid of him. I'd rather keep him in the hopes that a 37 year old understands that he's gonna be counted on to bring something in the playoffs and he's probably just not killing himself to be at his best early in the season, vs the 0, maybe even negative return on him without really giving us much cap relief either.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlairBettsBlocksEverything said:

I doubt there's anyone who would want him at this point. 

 

I think the potential upside of keeping him very much outweighs getting rid of him. I'd rather keep him in the hopes that a 37 year old understands that he's gonna be counted on to bring something in the playoffs and he's probably just not killing himself to be at his best early in the season, vs the 0, maybe even negative return on him without really giving us much cap relief either.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a good chance that it shakes out the way you’re saying, which if I’m reading you correctly, he’s a 13/14th forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BlairBettsBlocksEverything said:

I doubt there's anyone who would want him at this point. 

 

I think the potential upside of keeping him very much outweighs getting rid of him. I'd rather keep him in the hopes that a 37 year old understands that he's gonna be counted on to bring something in the playoffs and he's probably just not killing himself to be at his best early in the season, vs the 0, maybe even negative return on him without really giving us much cap relief either.

I think you have to move him just because you can't play him or health bomb him every night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pete said:

I think you have to move him just because you can't play him or health bomb him every night.

Im not sure who would take him, for anything other than us adding a pick. 

 

Unless we're coming up on the deadline, and we need just a tiny bit of cap space to pull off a big trade that makes us big-time cup favorites, i don't think the pick is worth the small cap space increase we get from moving him, relative to the potential upside he can bring in crunch time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pete said:

Get what you're saying, but then you have Quick and Bonino to counter that. They are playing, Boneroo got elevated, because he was doing his job. Wheeler isn't.

Fair point for sure. I'm just thinking they are more likely to use him in platoon than try and dump him.

 

goodrow on the other hand......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blue Heaven said:

I would assume if he were to be traded it would have to be a team that would be a playoff bubble team that would want some veteran leadership that needs a RWer.  Islanders?  Tampa?  

 

Western Conference plz.  Don't want a player with a chip on his shoulder playing rivalry games against the Rangers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Keirik said:

Fair point for sure. I'm just thinking they are more likely to use him in platoon than try and dump him.

 

goodrow on the other hand......

I don't want to hijack the thread but don't see them moving Goodrow in-season, for a plethora of reasons.

 

Wheeler is pretty unplayable at this point, so the have to either health-bomb him or dump him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't need to trade Wheeler, if that's the decision. We signed him to a league minimum 1 year deal with no movement restrictions. Just waive/send him down. He has had more than a fair shot here. He's cost us nothing to acquire and we don't need to entertain nothing in return.

 

That said, I don't see a need to free him. Let him choose. Either rotate in/out with people who can play still or go play in the AHL. There's nothing to really be decided here, but obviously he's played (or not played) his way out of the lineup with Brodzinski coming in and being effective. There's only so many spots and Wheeler is obviously the slow guy out 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Blue Heaven said:

I would assume if he were to be traded it would have to be a team that would be a playoff bubble team that would want some veteran leadership that needs a RWer.  Islanders?  Tampa?  

 

Isles, sure, but we both know that trade isn't happening. Tampa, maybe? They're definitely a bubble team but their current RWs are all out-scoring Wheeler by a mile. It's not like they're in an injury hole and need a plug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Phil said:

 

Isles, sure, but we both know that trade isn't happening. Tampa, maybe? They're definitely a bubble team but their current RWs are all out-scoring Wheeler by a mile. It's not like they're in an injury hole and need a plug.

Tampa would play Kuch 27 minutes a night before playing Wheeler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pete said:

Tampa would play Kuch 27 minutes a night before playing Wheeler.

 

They'd probably play Tyler Motte at 2RW before Wheeler.

I feel like Wheeler has to go west just to avoid the speed problem. On the whole, the East just laps him on the ice. There are too many water bugs here.

 

I don't know if/why they'd do it, but I'd be phoning Minnesota to see if they want him. Try to swap for Maroon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, siddious said:

I doubt he gets traded. I think eventually someone takes his role and he is a black ace. Just thank the hockey gods it was a 1 year deal. You cant blame drury for taking the chance.

 

 

 

Good point. It could be worse. Drury could have handed out a THREE YEAR DEAL to Ryan fuckin Reeves lol. I'll take the 1 year deal on Wheeler and healthy scratch him whenever needed...and play him 5-8 minutes on the other nights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...