Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

CBJ Acquire Damon Severson from NJD in Sign & Trade; 8-year/$50m Extension; $6.25m AAV


Recommended Posts

  • Morphinity 2.0 changed the title to CBJ Acquire Damon Severson from NJD in Sign & Trade; 8-year/$50m Extension; $6.25m AAV

 

8 minutes ago, Cash or Czech said:

I feel like we don't see too many sign and trades. Really cool use of the bonus 8th year. Columbus adds Provorov and Severson, plus a healthy Werenski. That D is looking better and better. 

Plus a work horse coach, 2 offensive dynamos. The pieces are there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Severson isn't good. He was a bottom pair guy who they just paid handsomely.

 

This is a bad move for them, the lost Gavrikov who's the better player and just signed for less in LA.

Edited by Pete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pete said:

Severson isn't good. He was a bottom pair guy who they just paid handsomely.

 

This is a bad move for them, the lost Gavrikov who's the better player and just signed for less in LA.

 

Severson was 2nd to Hamilton in TOI amongst their defensemen this year. His 5v5 xGF% was highest among the group at 58.84. It's a decent loss for the Devils. They just have too many guys they have to sign. They have $34M in space, but Bratt and Meier will eat up roughly $15-16M of it. 4-5 guys who are in line for $3-4M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, BrooksBurner said:

 

Severson was 2nd to Hamilton in TOI amongst their defensemen this year. His 5v5 xGF% was highest among the group at 58.84. It's a decent loss for the Devils. They just have too many guys they have to sign. They have $34M in space, but Bratt and Meier will eat up roughly $15-16M of it. 4-5 guys who are in line for $3-4M.

You read too much into these underlying stats. You use "expected X %"  as your basis for every argument

 

He ended the season on their third pair behind Hamilton and Marino. 

 

They paid him as a top pairing guy, but he's a bottom four defenseman. 

 

Vince nailed this:

 

 

 

 

Edited by Pete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Pete said:

You read too much into these underlying stats. You use "expected X %"  as your basis for every argument

 

He ended the season on their third pair behind Hamilton and Marino. 

 

They paid him as a top pairing guy, but he's a bottom four defenseman. 

 

Vince nailed this:

 

 

 

 

 

And then he backtracked...because he was wrong.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...