Jump to content

  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Rangers Trade F Mats Zuccarello to DAL for Two Conditional Draft Picks

Phil

By Phil
in New York Rangers

Recommended Posts

Mr.wiskers BSBH Mite

Mr.wiskers

Posted
Posted

That and they could always trade Zuccs rights for 3rd Rd pick giving the receiving team a window to try and sign him thereby circumventing the original deal they made with us. ( Hey, never know?Buffalo traded a 3rd pick to Nashville for Vesey?s right a couple of years ago)

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Mr.wiskers BSBH Mite

Mr.wiskers

Posted
Posted

Already a goal and an assist.

 

Nice to see Lundqvist and Zibenajad had nothing but good things to say about Zuccs, with Lundqvist even crying. Quinn just came off as a straight up Dick when asked about Zuccs but I can honestly say I?m not surprised coming from him.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pete BSBH Legend

Pete

Posted
Posted
Already a goal and an assist.

 

Nice to see Lundqvist and Zibenajad had nothing but good things to say about Zuccs, with Lundqvist even crying. Quinn just came off as a straight up Dick when asked about Zuccs but I can honestly say I’m not surprised coming from him.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

 

In Quinn's defense, his only experience with Zucc has been him spending time not playing because of injury, or playing shitty with a broken heart. I don't expect him to really comment on a guy he spent 40 games or so with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike BSBH Mite

Mike

Posted
Posted
Already a goal and an assist.

 

Nice to see Lundqvist and Zibenajad had nothing but good things to say about Zuccs, with Lundqvist even crying. Quinn just came off as a straight up Dick when asked about Zuccs but I can honestly say I’m not surprised coming from him.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

 

Why would Quinn be emotional? Hank has a reason, played with him for 9 years and they were close. Zibs was his liney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike BSBH Mite

Mike

Posted
Posted
In Quinn's defense, his only experience with Zucc has been him spending time not playing because of injury, or playing shitty with a broken heart. I don't expect him to really comment on a guy he spent 40 games or so with.

 

Yeah, this. Fans are idiots. It’s more embarrassing than embracing the fun in Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LONG LONG LONG TIME FAN BSBH Peewee

LONG LONG LONG TIME FAN

Posted
Posted
Glad we didn?t take back salary.!!

The Rangers retained approximately 30 percent of Zuccarello?s prorated $4.5 million annual salary-cap hit, helping the Stars get under their salary-cap crunch as they hold on to hope while battling for a wild-card spot.

https://nypost.com/2019/02/23/rangers-trade-mats-zuccarello-to-dallas-for-two-draft-picks/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keirik BSBH Legend

Keirik

Posted
Posted

I rarely post here anymore but what's up guys. This trade sort of confuses me a lot. He had to go. They were never bringing him back in the off season anyway. Two things other me though.

The first is that they waited til this year to do so. Last deadline probably yields a bit more of a return.

The second is this idea of getting a 1st if they resign him. Why would they resign him then? If they went all the way, they are losing one first already and achieved the ultimate goal. I doubt they bring him back then. If they get bounced in the first round, I'd assume they see Zucc as being nice but not effective enough to bring back. If they go for but lose they already give up one 1st rounder so I highly doubt they bring him back and give up 2 years of 1st rounders.

They couldn't get a actual mid level prospect with one conditional pick? While there is a possibility to get something out of the inevitable 3rd round pick, I'd rather have had the chance at a prospect that might have a bit more upside. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThirtyONE BSBH Regular

ThirtyONE

Posted
Posted
I rarely post here anymore but what's up guys. This trade sort of confuses me a lot. He had to go. They were never bringing him back in the off season anyway. Two things other me though.

The first is that they waited til this year to do so. Last deadline probably yields a bit more of a return.

The second is this idea of getting a 1st if they resign him. Why would they resign him then? If they went all the way, they are losing one first already and achieved the ultimate goal. I doubt they bring him back then. If they get bounced in the first round, I'd assume they see Zucc as being nice but not effective enough to bring back. If they go for but lose they already give up one 1st rounder so I highly doubt they bring him back and give up 2 years of 1st rounders.

They couldn't get a actual mid level prospect with one conditional pick? While there is a possibility to get something out of the inevitable 3rd round pick, I'd rather have had the chance at a prospect that might have a bit more upside. Just my opinion.

 

You're assuming this was available. Rangers took the best option available to them. All along people have been saying Zucc would get a 2nd. Not only did they get a second but also a 3rd and the possibly of a 1st. It's not a bad return for someone that frankly wasn't good for a majority of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike BSBH Mite

Mike

Posted
Posted
I rarely post here anymore but what's up guys. This trade sort of confuses me a lot. He had to go. They were never bringing him back in the off season anyway. Two things other me though.

The first is that they waited til this year to do so. Last deadline probably yields a bit more of a return.

The second is this idea of getting a 1st if they resign him. Why would they resign him then? If they went all the way, they are losing one first already and achieved the ultimate goal. I doubt they bring him back then. If they get bounced in the first round, I'd assume they see Zucc as being nice but not effective enough to bring back. If they go for but lose they already give up one 1st rounder so I highly doubt they bring him back and give up 2 years of 1st rounders.

They couldn't get a actual mid level prospect with one conditional pick? While there is a possibility to get something out of the inevitable 3rd round pick, I'd rather have had the chance at a prospect that might have a bit more upside. Just my opinion.

 

KEEEEEEEEIIIIIIITH

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keirik BSBH Legend

Keirik

Posted
Posted
You're assuming this was available. Rangers took the best option available to them. All along people have been saying Zucc would get a 2nd. Not only did they get a second but also a 3rd and the possibly of a 1st. It's not a bad return for someone that frankly wasn't good for a majority of the season.

 

Well, im under the assumption there would be some player or better option at some point from last year until now, yes. I just have a hard time figuring the best option was a series of conditional picks we most likely will never see blossom into anything significant. Everyone, including the entire NHL, knew that this team would sell from the second this organization put that assinine letter out last year announcing it. How is that good business and getting the "best" option for this organization? In my opinion it just let the entire NHL know to let the vultures go after the prey and i think the return they got for Zucc shows it. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...