Jump to content

RangerDanger

Members
  • Posts

    198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RangerDanger

  1. We are spending a lot of time talking about which available candidate has done the most, or comparing playoff records, etc.....but do we know which candidate has done the best with a roster similar to the Rangers? (I admittedly do not know, thus the reason I'm genuinely asking)
    The Rangers are still, I believe, in Win Now mode, and we'll see very little change to the current roster once you subtract Tank and Kane. So who fits that scenario the best?

  2. 24 minutes ago, Pete said:

     

    I posted in another thread, listen to Mercogliano's latest pod. He basically said that in year 1 Gallant's hands-off approach was a breath of fresh air, but by year 2 many players felt it was too hands-off, they needed help, and he didn't have it.

    Thanks Gents.

  3. 3 hours ago, Pete said:

    This is a bad narrative though. To a man, the players did not have good things to say. Even The kids were quoted during the season as saying they want the line changing to stop, they came out at the end of the season and said they wanted more playing time and more power play time. Nobody was happy with him.  

     

    But let's blame Panarin. 

    Is there a link to the player exit interviews? I've heard it mentioned a few times that they didn't have anything good to say, but haven't seen what was actually said.

  4. 2 hours ago, jsm7302 said:

    GG's problem was exactly that. He wanted to win individual games (not the worst idea). If they went on a short skid trying to gain chemistry and traction, it would be for the greater good. Drop a few to grow the team seems worth it. I think he was fearful for his job......and rightfully so.

    Yup, agreed. I got so frustrated this season when he'd switch the lines for a few games, saw success, then the team has one off game and he went right back to the same old same old. Whether it was Kreids/Tro or Zib/Kakko. 

    Personally would love to see Pan/Zib/Kakko, and Kreids/Tro/Vesey. IMO that gives you 2 decent lines, with 2 different styles (Line 1 skill, line 2 north/south), which should make the team harder to play against.

    Please, FFS, give these lines more than 5 games to gel.

    • Cheers 1
  5. Can we throw another helmet already?

    Call a cab?

    Maybe try throwing a cab?

    I don't even know wtf they're doing anymore. We were so worried about the defense before entering the playoffs, and had supreme confidence in scoring. Now the defense has stepped up and we can't buy a goal. And the response from the team after each loss is "we played a good game". Are we watching the same thing?? I don't think I've ever been this frustrated during a playoff series before.

    • LMFAO 1
  6. 30 minutes ago, jsm7302 said:

    I think it fair to say it is a little bit of both; playoff culture shock for Hughes.

     

    HOWEVER.... They have sured up defense in ways I didn't think this squad was capable of. Blocking shots, being in passing lanes, tying up sticks in front. Swarming the entry into the zone. The product is definitely due to some real next level play by these guys. They are hitting and playing heavier than they have all season. Gotta give props where props are due. I'm not saying the load will get easier but I can say, Boston is the only team I'm concerned with if this play keeps up.

    Honestly, the defense has been what's surprised me the most so far. I haven't watched the games, so not sure if we're legitimately playing better, or the Devils just aren't challenging as much? All I know is when I follow the GDT and don't watch the game, you guys are usually pretty good at pointing out who's lacking, and I've been hearing way less of that the past 2 games. So I'll take it as a positive.

×
×
  • Create New...