[brooks] Rangers "do not envision long-term relationship," with DeAngelo

[Phil]

Link:

[4EverRangerFrank]

Brooks just looking for eyeballs. I don?t believe this line of thinking. Trouba?s not here forever.

[Phil]

Trouba is signed for seven more years on a deal I can't imagine a lot of teams would be jumping to acquire. "Forever," is a relative term.

[Drew a Penalty]

Lundkvist going to UFA? Yeah, okay Larry. I highly doubt Lundkvist would stay in the SHL for another two seasons just to become a UFA especially if it means forgoing playing with the Rangers. Larry has to stir for views so I get it. He can't write about Josh Anderson anymore.

[Drew a Penalty]

Trouba is signed for seven more years on a deal I can't imagine a lot of teams would be jumping to acquire. "Forever," is a relative term.

 

If a team was willing to take a 30-year-old PK Subban at full hit then I'm not too concerned about being able to move Trouba down the line.

[Slobberknocker]

another piece of textbook evidence that new york sports writers are card carrying communist members.

 

greatest night in recent history draft wise and he tweets that huge load of crap.

 

"no one likes you" D. Boyle. great piece of tape.

[Ozzy]

ADA has some decent value in a deal. I'm curious to see how this one plays out.....

[RJWantsTheCup]

I could be wrong, but after the pick last night I don't see D'angelo being a Ranger long term either.

[Phil]

If a team was willing to take a 30-year-old PK Subban at full hit then I'm not too concerned about being able to move Trouba down the line.

 

One makes not a pattern.

[Pete]

One makes not a pattern.

 

Someone just took Staal's full hit. Albeit for one year, Touba would be infinitely more moveable at his age, later in his deal.

[Phil]

Someone just took Staal's full hit. Albeit for one year, Touba would be infinitely more moveable at his age, later in his deal.

 

Sure, in the final year. The Rangers also had to give up a second-round pick to Detroit in order for them to say yes. If they decided to trade him tomorrow, you think there's really gonna be a parade of teams champing at the bit to trade for him at full freight? I don't. I think there'd be a market, but it'd be pretty limited. He's really expensive and didn't come close to making right by that ticket in year one.

[Vodka Drunkenski]

Lundkvist going to UFA? Yeah, okay Larry. I highly doubt Lundkvist would stay in the SHL for another two seasons just to become a UFA especially if it means forgoing playing with the Rangers. Larry has to stir for views so I get it. He can't write about Josh Anderson anymore.

 

He hasn?t gotten any material from this board to write about lately so he?s just stirring

[BrooksBurner]

Trouba is signed for seven more years on a deal I can't imagine a lot of teams would be jumping to acquire. "Forever," is a relative term.

 

Six more years. I could see him potentially being on the move in a few years if he isn't quite what we had hoped. Though if it's really a full NMC with no partial trade clause like Staal had, then we might have him the full 6 yrs no matter what.

 

Edit: Modified NTC last 2 years of deal. Rangers can move on in 4 years if needed. And that lines up perfectly with Lundkvist's ELC expiring after he signs next offseason.

[Pete]

Sure, in the final year. The Rangers also had to give up a second-round pick to Detroit in order for them to say yes. If they decided to trade him tomorrow, you think there's really gonna be a parade of teams champing at the bit to trade for him at full freight? I don't. I think there'd be a market, but it'd be pretty limited. He's really expensive and didn't come close to making right by that ticket in year one.

 

I agree with you because "this year" includes internal caps for a lot of teams. If it was a normal NHL year, I think they'd be able to move him for a change of scenery type guy.

 

I know he has an NMC or NTC, but you don't think Winnipeg would trade Laine for him right now?

[Phil]

I agree with you because "this year" includes internal caps for a lot of teams. If it was a normal NHL year, I think they'd be able to move him for a change of scenery type guy.

 

I know he has an NMC or NTC, but you don't think Winnipeg would trade Laine for him right now?

 

No. I don't think Winnipeg would even want him back after the way he left. The fans detest him.

[Pete]

No. I don't think Winnipeg would even want him back after the way he left. The fans detest him.

 

Doesn't mean shit. Production rules.

[Sod16]

I would not read that much into the fact that the Rangers took a D Man who might be NHL ready three years from now. It's impossible to say what position you are going to need players at that far out, so you draft the best player available.

[Phil]

Doesn't mean shit. Production rules.

 

OK, but he just put up 27 points in 70 games coming off a 50 in 82 season with Winnipeg a year ago. That's a precipitous drop.

[Pete]

OK, but he just put up 27 points in 70 games coming off a 50 in 82 season with Winnipeg a year ago. That's a precipitous drop.

 

I mean look at Winnipeg's right side LOL...But yea...I didn't want him either. Forget the price tag it took to get him. So maybe you're right.

[Phil]

I mean, either way, he's certainly here for the next number of years. Whether that's 2, 4, or 6 doesn't matter — the right side is Trouba, Fox, and whomever.

[NYR2711]

I don't get what this pick has to do with ADA though. This isn't a kid who is going to step into the lineup this year. Defensemen take longer to become NHL ready, and I don't want to rush any young defensemen into the league who aren't ready like they did with MDZ. If they can get a 4 year deal on ADA, that is long enough for these kids to get ready to step in here.

[Kevin]

I think ADA is gone after this year because of Lundkvist, not because of this draft pick.

[Dunny]

I think ADA is gone after this year because of Lundkvist, not because of this draft pick.

 

No, Lundqvist will elect for FA because we just drafted a 18 year old out of Brandon, Manitoba, and the writing is on the wall.

 

What a fucking loser Larry Brooks is.

[RangersIn7]

This pick has nothing to do with ADA.

His status here long-term was already questionable.

[ThirtyONE]

Larry keeps pushing this idea that the Rangers aren't going to sign Lundkvist. I don't know why.

 

Schneider is a pick for the FUTURE. He's going to follow in Miller and Lundkvist's footsteps. He's not pushing out DeAngelo or Lundkvist in 2021.

 

So this whole argument is baseless.