Phil Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 The New York Rangers and Jesper Fast are attempting to work out a contract extension, sources tell Blueshirt Banter. Fast, who is in his home country of Sweden, spoke with both Head Coach David Quinn and General Manager Jeff Gorton as recently as today (Friday). Quinn specifically has gone to management and vehemently vouched for Fast?s return, Blueshirt Banter has learned. Fast?s strong priority is to remain a Blueshirt but, as a source claimed, ?he knows his worth.? The 28-year-old is an unrestricted free agent and his camp believes he would earn a contract on the open market that pays him $4 million annually. However, he would be willing to take a discount in order to make things work with the Rangers, requesting compensation that would fall short of that figure but still pay him an average annual salary in the range of $3.2 million. https://www.blueshirtbanter.com/2020/9/4/21422151/exclusive-jesper-fast-rangers-mutually-interested-in-new-contract-free-agent Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
RangersIn7 Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 If someone wants to give him $4 million per, then he should take it and they’re overpaying him
ThirtyONE Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 He's projected to be a 4th liner on this team in the near future. 3-4m is a lot. I wonder if they'll sign him and expose him to expansion.
BrooksBurner Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 3.25M was my max for Fast. Ideal was 2.5-2.75. He's worth the premium. 4 years @ 3.2M? Draw it up and call it a day 1
Drew a Penalty Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 I'm really doubtful he'd cash in on the open market the way he would with normal free agency. Teams aren't going to be as willing to shell out more for midling players with the flat cap. I think $3M is a perfectly reasonable number and I'm a big proponent of Fast. Anything more than $3M is tough with his likely soon-to-be reduced role.
BlairBettsBlocksEverything Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 3.25M was my max for Fast. Ideal was 2.5-2.75. He's worth the premium. 4 years @ 3.2M? Draw it up and call it a day Totally agreed. Especially when we’ll have big impact players on cost controlled deals assuming Laf is ready to roll and Kakko is ready to break out, as well as studs on the back end.
RodrigueGabriel Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 3.25M was my max for Fast. Ideal was 2.5-2.75. He's worth the premium. 4 years @ 3.2M? Draw it up and call it a dayLine up and sign up. Sent from my SM-G970U using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Pete Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 He's always been a bottom 9 player and he's always been a 25 to 30-point player. If he's on your fourth line, he makes your fourth line more reliable and able to eat more minutes. This is an absolutely fair deal for both sides.
Phil Posted September 4, 2020 Author Posted September 4, 2020 He's always been a bottom 9 player and he's always been a 25 to 30-point player. If he's on your fourth line, he makes your fourth line more reliable and able to eat more minutes. This is an absolutely fair deal for both sides. Yup, and even if he's overpaid in a few years, you can offset with ELC deals. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
4EverRangerFrank Posted September 4, 2020 Posted September 4, 2020 3.25M was my max for Fast. Ideal was 2.5-2.75. He's worth the premium. 4 years @ 3.2M? Draw it up and call it a day Very fair appraisal of Fast's worth to us and as a known entity, it should get done. ($4M is not happening...not in these times.)
josh Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 3.25M was my max for Fast. Ideal was 2.5-2.75. He's worth the premium. 4 years @ 3.2M? Draw it up and call it a day can not go 4 years. And 3+ for a 4th liner with the cap not going up?? This is a deal to avoid. 2y x 2.5m max
Pete Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 can not go 4 years. And 3+ for a 4th liner with the cap not going up?? This is a deal to avoid. 2y x 2.5m maxHe's not a 4th liner
Phil Posted September 5, 2020 Author Posted September 5, 2020 He's an elite fourth-liner if he is one. Produces like a reliable third. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
josh Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 He's an elite fourth-liner if he is one. Produces like a reliable third. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk in 3, 4 years? At the cost of a 2C? (Limiting the ability to.sign*)
BrooksBurner Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 can not go 4 years. And 3+ for a 4th liner with the cap not going up?? This is a deal to avoid. 2y x 2.5m max As already said by others, he's a 3rd liner, not a 4th liner. I'd prefer 3 years, but I'm not losing him over 1 extra year. It's an easy contract to get rid of if absolutely needed. Low risk.
Sod16 Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 He's worth 3.2. He's worth 1.2 more than the kind of player you would get as a replacement for 2.0. While some posters forever bemoan every shift he takes on one of the top two lines, the fact is that he can play that role. It is not ideal in the long term, but in the shorter term, yes. Number one, he can contribute some offense and has been decent at deflections and trench goals. Number two, if the top line is facing a fearsome No. 1 opposition line, one of the best five in the league, having one defensive specialist on the first line for that game is not a bad idea. Only bad point is that if he is taking a discount, he is right to insist on a NMC and would have to be protected in the expansion draft. Right now, we don't have that many good forwards in need of protection, so that may be okay.
Rangers Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 2.85 4 years. No to NMC, Take it or leave it. Cap is crap, if he gets a better deal, it will be marginally in today’s NHL.
The Dude Posted September 5, 2020 Posted September 5, 2020 Good call on him wanting a NMC. Definitely puts this idea in the "no" category.
Mr.wiskers Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 Don?t know how credible he is but Anthony Scultore of ForeverBlueshirts has an article on Fast where he says that he met with management and that he won?t be back. Jesper Fast: ?It would have been fun to stay, I?m open for anything.? By Anthony Scultore On his future with the Rangers ?We have had discussions, but it is still uncertain how it will go,? Fast said. The question not asked was when those discussions took place. What Fast went on to explain is that he doesn?t expect to have any further discussion until after the draft and right before free agency. ?I have to wait that time,? he finished. On September 1st, I spoke to a source with knowledge of the situation that told me ?the window has passed.? This statement and what Fast reveals is that those discussion took place before my article. ?Both me and my wife have really appreciated these seven years in New York,? Fast continued, ?I had a good role with the team.? Then his comments seemed to hint that his time with the Rangers was done. ?It would have been fun if I got the chance to stay. At the same time, a new role would be exciting. I?m open to anything.? Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
josh Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 I read the original article (translated), unless this is something else. I think they did a poor job interpreting his responses. I interpreted as the typical “we love NY and the Rangers, hope to stay, but it’s a business and I hope it works out.” He said something about being optimistic, regardless. “If I’m not a Ranger, it presents a new opportunity “ I think their wording makes the relationship worse.
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 I read the original article (translated), unless this is something else. I think they did a poor job interpreting his responses. I interpreted as the typical “we love NY and the Rangers, hope to stay, but it’s a business and I hope it works out.” He said something about being optimistic, regardless. “If I’m not a Ranger, it presents a new opportunity “ I think their wording makes the relationship worse. Was the original article in swedish? Can you post so I can read?
josh Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 I thought it was @jokkenevaleinen, as he tweets a lot of stuff out of Sweden and Finland but I can’t find it. I’ll post if I do find it.
Mr.wiskers Posted September 12, 2020 Posted September 12, 2020 This was what I found: Profile photo, opens profile page on Twitter in a new tab VP Sport @VPsporten Han fick v?nta n?stan fem m?nader p? att spela match igen. Men n?r Stanley cup-slutspelet v?l inleddes tog det slut n?stan innan det hann b?rja. Nu ?r N?ssj?b?rdige Jesper Fast kontraktsl?s och framtiden ?r oviss. https://vetlandaposten.se/artikel/jesper-fast-kontraktslos-efter-jobbiga-slutspelet-jag-ar-oppen-for-allt? #twittpuck Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Gravesy Posted September 15, 2020 Posted September 15, 2020 It's behind a paywall, but in the blurb it says he is "out of contract" and is open to anything.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now