Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Mercogliano: The Curious Case of Brett Howden


Phil

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You brought up Lindberg, who was also a center that was taken in the expansion draft and he also was going downhill production wise.

 

Yeah, and I brought him up because Howden having 9 points in his first 14 games meant nothing. Just like how it meant nothing for other garbage bin players like Vesey and Lindberg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in those 14 games that is when Quinn fell in love with Howden that is why he never was sent down to AHL.

 

Could be. I think it's partly that there's also been no legitimate alternative. Nieves fell out of good graces and struggled with injuries. The rotating cast of JAGs like McKegg, Fogarty, PDG, etc. don't offer much better of an alternative.

 

Andersson was his biggest competition and lost a spot that was his to lose.

 

Of all of the shit to choose from, Howden has been the most appealing painful as that is to say. That doesn't make him a long-term solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be. I think it's partly that there's also been no legitimate alternative. Nieves fell out of good graces and struggled with injuries. The rotating cast of JAGs like McKegg, Fogarty, PDG, etc. don't offer much better of an alternative.

 

Andersson was his biggest competition and lost a spot that was his to lose.

 

Of all of the shit to choose from, Howden has been the most appealing painful as that is to say. That doesn't make him a long-term solution.

 

Quinn's gamble might finally pay off if he has a breakout season, they desperately need that to not look like losers on the McDonagh/Miller trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep coming back to pretty smart hockey people talking up Howden. I don't think anyone has really answered that.

 

Are they just upping his value?

 

We need to look no further than Toronto to see failure by spreadsheet. Are people putting too much stock into stats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep coming back to pretty smart hockey people talking up Howden. I don't think anyone has really answered that.

 

Are they just upping his value?

 

We need to look no further than Toronto to see failure by spreadsheet. Are people putting too much stock into stats?

 

Hustle. Spunk. Lias was shittier.

 

If you wanna use eye-test as a counterpoint, what do you see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hustle. Spunk. Lias was shittier.

 

If you wanna use eye-test as a counterpoint, what do you see?

I haven't said anything about Howden. Don't make it about me.

 

I'm asking why people think that other hockey people who know way more about hockey than any of us defend Howden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't said anything about Howden. Don't make it about me.

 

I'm asking why people think that other hockey people who know way more about hockey than any of us defend Howden.

 

I answered. So I asked your own question. If it's not stats, then it's eye-test. So what do you think they see? Is that an inappropriate question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I answered. So I asked your own question. If it's not stats, then it's eye-test. So what do you think they see? Is that an inappropriate question?
Well, you didn't ask what I thought they saw. You asked what I saw. so you moving the goal post just a little bit, but I don't mind it.

 

As I said earlier, they are either upping his trade value, or they see a young player working hard every day in practice and on the ice in games, and that gets rewarded with ice time regardless of success.

 

In my mind, that's meritocracy. You will reward effort and work ethic before everything else, and that's probably a pretty important message to a young team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you didn't ask what I thought they saw. You asked what I saw. so you moving the goal post just a little bit, but I don't mind it.

 

As I said earlier, they are either upping his trade value, or they see a young player working hard every day in practice and on the ice in games, and that gets rewarded with ice time regardless of success.

 

In my mind, that's meritocracy. You will reward effort and work ethic before everything else, and that's probably a pretty important message to a young team.

 

And I agree with that 100%. Like I said, hustle and spunk. Quinn wants his players to be good soldiers, his work with players like ADA, Buch, Chytil, and Kakko being examples. Howden, while deficient in skillset is a good soldier in Quinn's eyes. His effort is unquestionable. His results are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I agree with that 100%. Like I said, hustle and spunk. Quinn wants his players to be good soldiers, his work with players like ADA, Buch, Chytil, and Kakko being examples. Howden, while deficient in skillset is a good soldier in Quinn's eyes. His effort is unquestionable. His results are.
Gotcha. I thought you were referring to hustle and spunk as typical NHL buzzwords.

 

I actually think it's a great lesson for the young skilled players who come here to see that it's effort and drive that get rewarded, and not talent.

 

So we're on the same page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotcha. I thought you were referring to hustle and spunk as typical NHL buzzwords.

 

I actually think it's a great lesson for the young skilled players who come here to see that it's effort and drive that get rewarded, and not talent.

 

So we're on the same page.

 

Right. It's good for competition in the short-term. Howden probably isn't in jeopardy of losing his spot this season, but is likely the type of player you move on from with the flat cap when you have cheaper replacements in Barron, Richards, Kodorenko, etc. At the very least, it shows notable hard workers like Richards and Barron that their work will be appreciated if they stay the course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I agree with that 100%. Like I said, hustle and spunk. Quinn wants his players to be good soldiers, his work with players like ADA, Buch, Chytil, and Kakko being examples. Howden, while deficient in skillset is a good soldier in Quinn's eyes. His effort is unquestionable. His results are.

 

Howden is pretty intelligent and has good attitude. Coaches like players that are easy to work with and communicate with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you didn't ask what I thought they saw. You asked what I saw. so you moving the goal post just a little bit, but I don't mind it.

 

As I said earlier, they are either upping his trade value, or they see a young player working hard every day in practice and on the ice in games, and that gets rewarded with ice time regardless of success.

 

In my mind, that's meritocracy. You will reward effort and work ethic before everything else, and that's probably a pretty important message to a young team.

 

Yeah, I think it's a lot to do with intangibles.

 

- Good kid

- Comes in every day and works hard to improve

- Coachable, in the sense that he does - or at least tries to do - what he's told

- Great character

- Works his hardest every single shift

- Etc

 

That, coupled with the fact the alternatives aren't considerably better probably works in his favor. Being part of the McD trade probably doesn't hurt, but tbf it hasn't helped Hajek much.

It's understandable, but at the same time it's hard to argue with the data. He's ineffective and in most categories a net negative.

I still maintain he'd benefit from a good stint in Hartford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it doesn't. Lots of guys are in the league who shouldn't be. By this logic, Jack Johnson is good. Zac Rinaldo is good.

 

I have no idea what you're talking about. No one said anything about if Howden is good or bad. That actually has nothing at all to do with the specific point I made to Josh which is if you are in the NHL, you had to have some success at lower level and therefore you can "play hockey". Playing it well is an entirely different discussion.

 

But you bring up a point, almost every team has these players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...