Phil Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 Link: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4EverRangerFrank Posted April 7, 2019 Share Posted April 7, 2019 Well, well. The season hasn't ended even 24-hours and already, there is good news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirtyONE Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 This season was mostly a placeholder for next season. It still sucks that it?s a year of my life gone but hopefully next year there?s something to look forward to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Georgiev finishes season strong, they want Shestyorkin here next year, and Slats is stepping down? Bye, Hank. Thanks for keeping us a relevant hockey team for the last 13 years. Here’s to hoping someone can fill his shoes both on and off the ice for even 1/2 the time he held court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Georgiev finishes season strong, they want Shestyorkin here next year, and Slats is stepping down? Bye, Hank. Thanks for keeping us a relevant hockey team for the last 13 years. Here’s to hoping someone can fill his shoes both on and off the ice for even 1/2 the time he held court. Yeah, I'm feeling the same. And there's no doubt he was the 2nd goalie down the stretch. Georgiev outplayed him significantly from January on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Georgiev finishes season strong, they want Shestyorkin here next year, and Slats is stepping down? Bye, Hank. Thanks for keeping us a relevant hockey team for the last 13 years. Here’s to hoping someone can fill his shoes both on and off the ice for even 1/2 the time he held court. No. Terrible business decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Falco Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 No. Terrible business decision. It appears to be the most likely scenario though. What?s the alternative? I don?t think Lundqvist expected to affected by the season like this at all. He looked bad, sounds even worse in interviews. If I were him, I?d be trying to win a cup at this point in my career. Should waive and go to a contender IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 No. Terrible business decision. The terrible business decision was Sather giving him that huge deal in 2014. Wish him no ill will, he played very well here. But he's now old, on the downside and overpaying him is killing this team's ability to sign talent. And nobody is building any NHL team around a goalie, or at least not overpaying him ridiculously. Feel bad for him, a few lucky breaks in 2012 or 2014 and he might have his name on the Cup. But it didn't happen.As with Messier II, you cannot pay or worse overpay for past performance and especially so in a cap NHL. Problem is NOBODY walks away form this kind of money and his contract is untradeable. Think there is a situation to keep any eye on in Toronto. Leafs are set to get beat up by the Bruins and then hold a circular firing squad of recrimination. May create an opportunity for both NYR and Lundqvist. With his no trade he's not going to Arizona or Edmonton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Heaven Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 It appears to be the most likely scenario though. What’s the alternative? I don’t think Lundqvist expected to affected by the season like this at all. He looked bad, sounds even worse in interviews. If I were him, I’d be trying to win a cup at this point in my career. Should waive and go to a contender IMO. What contender needs a goalie AND could afford him? No: Caps, Pens, Lightning, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Canadiens, Preds, Vegas, Jets, Stars Maybe: Islanders, Blue Jackets, Hurricanes, Avs, Blues Chances he would waive his NTC to Winnipeg, Carolina, EDM, slim to none. Chances the Rangers would trade him to Islanders, Pens or to any contender in the Eastern Conference, again slim to none. Also, Henrik/JT have history and you can cancel them out. We're stuck with him unless he really does choose to ask for a trade at the next trade deadline for the perfect scenerio where the top team in the NHL loses their #1 goalie for the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 What contender needs a goalie AND could afford him? No: Caps, Pens, Lightning, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Canadiens, Preds, Vegas, Jets, Stars Maybe: Islanders, Blue Jackets, Hurricanes, Avs, Blues Chances he would waive his NTC to Winnipeg, Carolina, EDM, slim to none. Chances the Rangers would trade him to Islanders, Pens or to any contender in the Eastern Conference, again slim to none. Also, Henrik/JT have history and you can cancel them out. We're stuck with him unless he really does choose to ask for a trade at the next trade deadline for the perfect scenerio where the top team in the NHL loses their #1 goalie for the year.Florida, if they don't get Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 It appears to be the most likely scenario though. What’s the alternative? I don’t think Lundqvist expected to affected by the season like this at all. He looked bad, sounds even worse in interviews. If I were him, I’d be trying to win a cup at this point in my career. Should waive and go to a contender IMO. Define bad, I guess. Mostly, Henrik was fine, he got frustrated - that happens with all players on bad teams. Still though, his 5v5 save % was better than Georgiev's...and better than a bunch of other #1s, including Fleury, Varlamov, Bobrovsky, Crawford, Smith, Anderson and Quick. No doubt his play slipped at times, but it's a mental thing, not a physical one. With any sort of competency in front of him, he's still an elite goaltender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Florida, if they don't get Bob. Thought that could also work, but ...Luongo. Is Luongo still under contract for 2019/20? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 It appears to be the most likely scenario though. What’s the alternative? I don’t think Lundqvist expected to affected by the season like this at all. He looked bad, sounds even worse in interviews. If I were him, I’d be trying to win a cup at this point in my career. Should waive and go to a contender IMO. He's still trying to win. He still wants to win here. Hence the horrible play since January, when is was obvious they werent making the playoffs. The offseason moves (or lack thereof) will help make his decision. I think he'd rather retire a Ranger than move around the league trying to chase a cup - because that almost never happens to a guy in his situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Florida, if they don't get Bob. The whole front office should be replaced if they are going with Lundqvist and Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jhon.L Posted April 14, 2019 Share Posted April 14, 2019 i think this will make a good singin for rangers Tutuapp 9apps Showbox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now