Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Mikko Koivu: Every Kid Get's His Jersey Retired


Sod16

Recommended Posts

So the Wild is retiring his jersey.  He was a good defensive oriented center over a long period who had a total of two, yes two, twenty goal seasons.  He was selected for the all star game precisely once.  He never was on a post-season all start team.  He didn't play on a cup winner, or for a team that won more than one round in the playoffs, for that matter.  He'll never step on the same block in Toronto as the Hall of Fame.  Should a relatively new team lower the bar for this?  It's getting ridiculous.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Phil changed the title to Mikko Koivu: Every Kid Get's His Jersey Retired
29 minutes ago, Sod16 said:

Gaborik was well established long before Koivu played for the Wild.

How does that change the point? Name another memorable Wild player... And I mean memorable for the right reasons. 

 

I mean maybe you can because you live there, but the rest of us pretty much associate the wild with Koivu. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, what's being said a lot here is right — jersey retirements (dumb as they are!) are for fans of a franchise. They're not supposed to "make sense" to everyone everywhere. Koivu means nothing to you or me. He means everything to young fans who grew up watching the Wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pete said:

How does that change the point? Name another memorable Wild player... And I mean memorable for the right reasons. 

 

So a good chunk of the teams are relatively new.  Should they lower the bar and start retiring jerseys of players who aren't even close to HOF if that's all they've got?  The trouble is that there is a snowballing effect.  Next, some team will retire the sweater of some guy not quite as worthy as Koviu, etc.  Well, I shouldn't expect much from a team with a dumb name and logo who retired #1, in honor of their fans (who failed to support the North Stars), on opening night of their first year.

 

As for us, I love Graves, Richter and Hadfield, but they are questionable.  Park is more deserving.  Only seven years and change with the Rangers but the only post-war Ranger with three first team all star selections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sod16 said:

So a good chunk of the teams are relatively new.  Should they lower the bar and start retiring jerseys of players who aren't even close to HOF if that's all they've got?  The trouble is that there is a snowballing effect.  Next, some team will retire the sweater of some guy not quite as worthy as Koviu, etc.  Well, I shouldn't expect much from a team with a dumb name and logo who retired #1, in honor of their fans (who failed to support the North Stars), on opening night of their first year.

 

As for us, I love Graves, Richter and Hadfield, but they are questionable.  Park is more deserving.  Only seven years and change with the Rangers but the only post-war Ranger with three first team all star selections.

Who do you think nostalgia and legacies get created? Should you just not create moments for the fans because the franchise is new and doesn't have the legacy of the Leafs?

 

I dunno about that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cash or Czech said:

I like the way European Football does it. Become one of the many 'famous' players to get to wear the prestigious number for the team, like Manchester United with Beckham, Ronaldo and others in the Number 7. I think that builds on history much better than a jersey retirement. 

Would never work in hockey - players are too deferential.

 

Example: 66 isn't retired anywhere except Pittsburgh, yet no one (except Josh Ho Sang) dares wear the number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Morphinity said:

Would never work in hockey - players are too deferential.

 

Example: 66 isn't retired anywhere except Pittsburgh, yet no one (except Josh Ho Sang) dares wear the number. 

 

Because they're cowards. Fuck this stupid unwritten law.

  • LOL 1
  • VINNY! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pete said:

Who do you think nostalgia and legacies get created? Should you just not create moments for the fans because the franchise is new and doesn't have the legacy of the Leafs?

 

I dunno about that one.

I'm sticking with Pete. This is about the franchise and not the league as a whole. It builds the story of the franchise. He may not be an all time leader in anything other than leadership for the franchise but that means a lot to that generation of fans. Im all for honoring the players and at this point the only standing process to do that is jersey retirement. It stands to solidify in franchise history what that player did to establish the franchise. It isnt about stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Phil said:

 

Because they're cowards. Fuck this stupid unwritten law.

Why are they cowards? Because they choose to show their respect to a great player in a way that you don't agree with?

 

Like @Morphinity said, there's no rule that they can't wear it, they are choosing not to. And also let's not act like this is a widespread problem, players wear 77 and 68, 9, etc. There was literally one example given, 66.

Edited by Pete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/10/2022 at 4:37 PM, Cash or Czech said:

I like the way European Football does it. Become one of the many 'famous' players to get to wear the prestigious number for the team, like Manchester United with Beckham, Ronaldo and others in the Number 7. I think that builds on history much better than a jersey retirement. 

History is a bit different as usual, I remember the days when soccer players didn't even have their own numbers to begin with. Instead numbers were tied (roughly) to positions. With lower numbers going to the Defense, 9 and 11 usually being forwards and 10 the guy who drove the play.

We switched to personal numbers in the Mid-90s, England a bit earlier I think.

And apparently numbers in general don't appear until after WW2, by that time the Leafs had already started retiring numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...