Ozzy Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Is Zac Jones getting ready for his high school picture ? I thought Kreider was out. Recovering from getting his chest waxed yesterday Yes. He's hurt because he wanted to be Elsa, not Anna. Stupid Howden. His cold streak is starting to resemble Ozzy's Here are the finalists for Ozzy's Post of the Night GDT, sponsored by Trojan: ....Aaaaaaaaaaand the winner is Paddy in a close race tonight with his take on the interview with Zac Jones!!!:rofl: Nice job Paddy!!! .....oh and Josh man...I have a new approach!! Get this: I met this really hot chick in the bar last Friday night. There was this instant spark between us, and she immediately fell to the floor at my feet. I just kept thinking.... "Fuck!!! These taser guns are so worth the money!!!" :rofl: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Think it’s 9 point difference to 4. I don’t know about you but I have an easier time seeing us make up a 2 game deficit rather than a 5 game deficit Boston has 2 games in hand. Pittsburgh has 0. At this rate, Boston is winning those 2 games in hand. 9 vs 8 is close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sod16 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Going into the final two against the Bruins 4 down doesn't seem like that tall of an order, given that we are currently 4 down with Boston having two at hand. We hold the tie breakers, so a pair of OT or SO wins over the Bruins would then put us in. After 2010, we'd be owed one under those circumstances! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 How great would that be if they are both tied for points ? Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk they have 2 games after those against Islanders/Caps so we'd need to be up 4 as those teams positions will probably be clinched and the Caps wont want to play us obviously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWantsTheCup Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Going into the final two against the Bruins 4 down doesn't seem like that tall of an order, given that we are currently 4 down with Boston having two at hand. We hold the tie breakers, so a pair of OT or SO wins over the Bruins would then put us in. After 2010, we'd be owed one under those circumstances! If the Rangers are down 4 points going into the last 2 games they have to win both games in regulation to make the playoffs. Boston would get a point for going to overtime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sod16 Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 I misspoke, they would need reg wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slobberknocker Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 nice effort. fox is such a pleasure to watch... gonna be fun to see him continue to grow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LONG LONG LONG TIME FAN Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Back to back! Team played a terrific game over all. No naysayers for this one? The bandwagon is overloaded. Tuff that the wins go hand in hand with the Bruins victories; ahead in the standings with games in hand. 3 consecutive shut-outs would be a milestone for this team. Yeah, I'm in dreamland... always the optimist. Be waiting for the next game and hopefully the team will perform as they are capable of doing. Bye, bye from the YSUOA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBrowningPI Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 I called Tues. 4-0 , was 3-0 shutout I called it 3-0 Thurs. Was 4-0 2nd shutout. Not ballsey (cause Devils suck) but a little bold maybe. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirtyONE Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Bench Kreider or drop him to 3 or 4? Hopefully next year we realize that our current 1st line of Kreider - Zib - Buch isn't actually a 1st line. There are already better options and these kids are just going to get better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Hopefully next year we realize that our current 1st line of Kreider - Zib - Buch isn't actually a 1st line. There are already better options and these kids are just going to get better. As I've said, the goal is to have that be the third line, hopefully by the end of next season. Plus, the Panarin line is the first line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Jimmy Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 nice effort. fox is such a pleasure to watch... gonna be fun to see him continue to grow. Future "C" right there..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Fox is just a second year defenseman and he's almost a point per game player for his career, while also being a +40. It's insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 16, 2021 Author Share Posted April 16, 2021 Hopefully next year we realize that our current 1st line of Kreider - Zib - Buch isn't actually a 1st line. There are already better options and these kids are just going to get better. Why aren't they a first line? As I've said, the goal is to have that be the third line, hopefully by the end of next season. Plus, the Panarin line is the first line. Ice time says otherwise. Zibanejad, Buchnevich, and Kreider are second, third, and fourth respectively in ES TOI/G. Strome leads and Panarin is actaully below Lafreniere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted April 16, 2021 Share Posted April 16, 2021 Why aren't they a first line? Ice time says otherwise. Zibanejad, Buchnevich, and Kreider are second, third, and fourth respectively in ES TOI/G. Strome leads and Panarin is actaully below Lafreniere. I looked about a week ago, Panarin was leading forwards in ES TOI and I thought Strome was 2, Buch 3. Ok, I looked again, Panarin 1 (by 1:30), Buch, Strome 3, Zibanejad, Kreider, Kakko. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 17, 2021 Author Share Posted April 17, 2021 Sorry, I was looking at total ES time, so you're probably right. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now