Kevin Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2727839-leon-draisaitl-oilers-agree-to-8-year-68-million-contract-extension $8.5 million cap hit a season. I think it's a little less than what was initially expected but now that over $20 million for just two players each season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valriera Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 Jesus christ that is banking on these guys in a huge way. But...if they are the next Crosby/Malkin which by all measures they could be, it's absolutely going to be worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 I don't have a problem with it at all. I think for the longest time the market was precisely backwards, making young players play for pennies (figuratively speaking) during their most productive years only to award them a big ticket, long-term contract once they reached the age of 27, at which point they began their statistical declines and offered teams far fewer years of the same or similar production. I'd rather pay Draisaitl $8.5M from the ages of 22 to 28 than from 28 to 35. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valriera Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 I'd rather pay Draisaitl $8.5M from the ages of 22 to 28 than from 28 to 35. Well...yeah. But all of that is assuming that ages 22 to 28 merit such a contract from 28 to 35, on which there is no guarantee. So with a crystal ball of course it is better, but they could also be stuck with a Chris Kreider for that money, which would deeply suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted August 17, 2017 Author Share Posted August 17, 2017 I don't have a problem with it at all. I think for the longest time the market was precisely backwards, making young players play for pennies (figuratively speaking) during their most productive years only to award them a big ticket, long-term contract once they reached the age of 27, at which point they began their statistical declines and offered teams far fewer years of the same or similar production. I'd rather pay Draisaitl $8.5M from the ages of 22 to 28 than from 28 to 35. He's going to get paid from 28 - 35 too if performs halfway decent during this contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Well...yeah. But all of that is assuming that ages 22 to 28 merit such a contract from 28 to 35, on which there is no guarantee. So with a crystal ball of course it is better, but they could also be stuck with a Chris Kreider for that money, which would deeply suck. There's no such thing as a guarantee, period. The point is that all the data over the last decade plus statistically suggest that NHL forwards are most productive between the ages of 21 and 27. It's a game of risk assessment, and the common assessment suggests that you're rarely burned for paying impact talent early and often burned for paying them later. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 He's going to get paid from 28 - 35 too if performs halfway decent during this contract. Sure, and the Oilers can walk away and let him earn a similar or greater amount for what will likely be less return and rest easy knowing they got him through his prime. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.