Jump to content

Jdog99

Members
  • Posts

    691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jdog99

  1. 1 hour ago, Pete said:

    I got you, until the bolded. 

     

    If your scenario plays out, the only drastic change needed would be a coaching change. And that doesn't require picks and prospects. 

     

    Yes, a coaching change would be a top consideration.

     

    But even now, well need picks and prospects as a way to creatively fill holes left by cap casualties.

  2. would be exciting and all, but here's the biggest issue going "all in" with kane:

     

    if we run into teams in the playoffs who play faster, stronger, and hem us in our own end for whole periods at a time (like we saw at least half if not most of last playoffs), it won't make a whole lot of difference how much talent we have... we'll get knocked out, eventually, and be saying that we need to drastically change the makeup of this team going forward...except we'll have given up a bunch of pieces (draft picks, prospects etc.) that we would need to try and make some kind of meaningful change.

     

    the focus ought to be on getting the current team to play more cohesively, confidently, and with the style needed to succeed at playoff hockey

    • Applause 1
  3. Certainly Chytil and/or Miller are the priorities here. Whether you can afford to let one of them go depends on whether there will be any prospects (via trade, draft, free agent...) we can  gamble on.

     

    Laf is expendable, especially with Othman on the horizon. Gotta consider using his dollars elsewhere (unless its possible to trade kreider).

     

    Goodrow is expendable.

     

    Would be tough to move on from lindgren, but perhaps its time for schneider to elevate and figure out replacements that can help make the rd-ld pairings work.

     

     

  4. It seems really bizarre to me that we still 'need' a 4th line C, after going out and signing one in the offseason, then releasing him and picking someone up on waivers, not to mention having an extra C in Goodrow that GG just doesn't happen to like at C?

     

    Seems like this can't be as much a 'hole' in our resources as much as piss poor ability at utilizing the resources you already have.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Keeps it 100 1
  5. Well the solution here looks like it could be that panarin needs to pivot towards being a goal scorer.

     

    If he changed his style and mindset a bit, im sure he has the skills to be a 40+ goal scorer.

     

    His pass first, second and last style has become gimiky. Hes like just playing a role of this uber playmaker but not actually being as effective as he could.

     

    I remember the one game in the playoffs vs tb where he finally looked to be breaking out of his funk by skating hard and being aggressive. He looked like a force (for a single game at least). Thats the panarin thatll win us a cup.

  6. 14 minutes ago, phillyb said:

    Is Bedard that good? Does he step in immediately (next season) and help us win a cup? Not for nothing, but we went to the ECF last season...this team's window is literally now - not sure you give up those three for 1OA next year. 

    exactly - this teams window is now...as in this season...chytil is then gone, or we have some other big casualty + repercussions down the line, so might as well consider risking a possible one hit retool with the best 10A since Mcdavid

  7. Its nothing to do with trochek...i like him and he could be good for us...but we always knew there were limited dollars to spend on chytil, kakko, miller, laf etc...and we actually had some rock solid evidence of chytils potential in the playoffs.. your going to have to take some risks to build the future of this team and why drury wouldnt have taken that risk on chytil i dont understand.

×
×
  • Create New...