Pete

Yeah, the tweet is dumb. But if that elbow connects it's still a sussy.

Dunno. He was going for a shoulder to shoulder, but when he realized it was mis-timed, He stuck his elbow out. You can't do that.

Speak for yourselves, I couldn't be happier with where they are now. I'm happy when they win, regardless of who scores or is in the lineup, or if they get out shot and out chanced. A win is a win, it's a race to 16 and it doesn't matter how you get there.

Those stats are about as relevant as Carolina xGF%. It's a ridiculous point you're trying to prove. "Hey, we don't know why the record is better, but the record is better!" It's baseless. I like him, I want him to play, I'm glad they win when he's in the lineup, but to act like he's the reason they win It's just so far from reality that I don't even know where to begin.

Nobody on Carolina is scared of him, because nobody is going to fight him. Their defense certainly isn't scared of him, and the refs have a Target on him. Brindamour said in his post game that this was the best game the Rangers played all series. So that just goes to show you what the opposition thinks of a Rempe-less lineup. I swear, I think some posters here just get a hard-on watching him sit on the bench and do nothing for 90% of the game.

Except for the whole season before he was called up? And the games he got tossed from?

They looked like ass in the Stadium Series where he played! They needed a 3P comeback and PPs to win! What did he have to do with that after his one fight in the opening minutes where they then proceeded to start losing? The record is smoke and mirrors man.

You know I've said this forever so I agree. I went and looked at his game log and it's littered with wins against CBJ, PHI, NYI, NJ, STL, MTL, OTT...These are not good teams. Look man if Canes fans were on this forum and saw us arguing over how a 5:00 4th liner was the key to winning...Come on man. Let's be real. Rangers record before Rempe was .676. After it was .704, and that's with Rempe sitting some. That's not a discernable difference.

With all due respect, it's not difficult to explain. It's a small sample size of coincidence. Nobody can point directly to what he does, and we all know that he barely plays and gets kicked out of some of the games we won when he "dressed". More than likely it's that he dresses against teams that aren't that good and doesn't dress against better teams, hence the record. I'm not gonna go back and look though. Maybe later.

And that's all a nice little side story, but the fact is the team doesn't need a fourth line grinder to win games. It's not that complicated.

Why would you combine the minuses?

Apparently they're not sure either.

Are you done embarrassing yourself?