RichieNextel305 Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 (edited) Edited March 6, 2024 by RichieNextel305
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 Well fuck. I don't want to play Florida in the playoffs this year...
RJWantsTheCup Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 Hard to believe the Rangers couldn’t top that offer. Hopefully Drury doesn’t disappoint with whatever moves he makes.
Ozzy Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 I guess we didn't want him...'cause that's not much! 1
Dunny Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 Gonna be tough when we pay through the nose for Wennberg and guys like Tarasenko and Mantha go for virtually nothing. Hopefully this is a sign that Drury has something really special cooking. 1
Phil Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 1 minute ago, Pete said: Panthers still don't scare me. Same. Neither does Tarasenko.
Ozzy Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 Just now, Dunny said: Gonna be tough when we pay through the nose for Wennberg and guys like Tarasenko and Mantha go for virtually nothing. Hopefully this is a sign that Drury has something really special cooking. If that's all that was given up for Tank, I hope we don't give up a lot for Wennberg.
siddious Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Pete said: Panthers still don't scare me. No one scares me. There are a handful of teams that could win this including the rangers. But florida has to be one of the front runners even before this trade with that said in shocked about this return. No retention? Edited March 6, 2024 by siddious
BrooksBurner Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 That’s all Tarasenko returned? And we are talking a 2nd+ for Wennberg? FOH
Vodka Drunkenski Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 12 minutes ago, RJWantsTheCup said: Hard to believe the Rangers couldn’t top that offer. Hopefully Drury doesn’t disappoint with whatever moves he makes. 7 minutes ago, Ozzy said: I guess we didn't want him...'cause that's not much! weren’t allowed to get the retention apparently
Keirik Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 This is good. Tank sets the market low again. I was indifferent for him. I'm not sure how well he would have worked at 1rw 1 1
Ozzy Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 Just now, RichieNextel305 said: FULL TRADE DETAILS: I'm thinking we passed on him intentionally. That is not a lot at all.
Ozzy Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 1 minute ago, Keirik said: This is good. Tank sets the market low again. I was indifferent for him. I'm not sure how well he would have worked at 1rw You may have been right, Big Daddy! He may not have worked with Kreider and Zibby. Then again, fucking Rocket Richard probably wouldn't either! 1
RJWantsTheCup Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 8 minutes ago, Vodka Drunkenski said: weren’t allowed to get the retention apparently They would've had to get a 3rd team involved for retention, but I think they could've made it work without retention. We will see what Drury pulls off to determine if they missed an opportunity on this trade.
RJWantsTheCup Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 1 minute ago, Ozzy said: You may have been right, Big Daddy! He may not have worked with Kreider and Zibby. Then again, fucking Rocket Richard probably wouldn't either! He looked fine with them last season in a small sample. 1 1
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 11 minutes ago, RichieNextel305 said: FULL TRADE DETAILS: What the fuck is this? A 4th round pick and a 3rd round pick next year for Tarasenko WITH retention? That’s nothing lol.
Keirik Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 11 minutes ago, RJWantsTheCup said: He looked fine with them last season in a small sample. From what I remember, he moreso played with Panarin last year. Plus there's always that fact we got bounced in round 1 so I'm not going to lose sleep over not getting him. It wasn't some magic in a bottle acquisition.
Pete Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 16 minutes ago, RJWantsTheCup said: They would've had to get a 3rd team involved for retention, but I think they could've made it work without retention. We will see what Drury pulls off to determine if they missed an opportunity on this trade. That Twitter chatter about retention was never confirmed or verified by anyone reputable.
BrooksBurner Posted March 6, 2024 Posted March 6, 2024 18 minutes ago, Ozzy said: I'm thinking we passed on him intentionally. That is not a lot at all. He would have consumed all their cap space and left no room for anything else. I think it says Drury is prioritizing having room for a center.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now