Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Crosby vs McDavid


Albatrosss

Recommended Posts

first 7 years in the league:

Crosby--gp 434, g 223, a 386, points 609.  1.40 points/game

McDavid--gp 487, g 239, a 458, points 697.  1.43 points/game

 

The stats are very similar, especially points per game.  McJesus played more games and i guess less prone to injuries.  Who do you think is a better player? Who would you have on your team if you had to pick one? (Stanley Cups dont count cause that's a team achievement).
 

For me it is a difficult decision.  McJesus is much more of a exciting player and an incredible goal scorer.  But i think i would have to pick Crosby, as much as i hate him.  I think Crosby can whine himself and his team to a cup win, and the end result justifies the means.  

Your thoughts...

  • The Chyt! 1
  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a very fair comparison. You can even say they both had a Robin to their Batman (Draisaitl/Malkin) 

   I’d probably lean with McDavid being the better talent while Crosby being the better captain.  3 cups amd 2 Conn Smythes can’t be discounted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gun to my head, I pick Crosby, because regardless of the Cups, we've seen him exert his will and carry his entire team through playoff series. That's not something McDavid can speak to yet, even though I'd argue he's more talented.

  • Keeps it 100 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, put me in with a Crosby vote too....pretty much the leadership and ability to throw his team on his back in the playoffs.  Mc Jesus has the whole world in his hands talent-wise, no doubt...but yeah...gun to the head: Crosby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDavid is definitely more talented. Unfortunately Crosby is a legend, so until McDavid gets there by winning multiple cups it's not really a conversation imo.

 

I draw the line in this place around > 1 stanley cup. Typically a good player is going to win one in their career. Legendary players carry their team to several and Crosby has done it multiple times. Dude's in the short area of legend status. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tonybologna said:

I feel like Crosby had better teams around him than McDavid. I also just hate Crosby and think Mcdavid is still going to get better, I pick McDavid.

Hmm...I'm not so sure I agree there. Outside of Guetzel, Crosby rarely had played with great linemates for long stretches 

  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Keirik said:

Hmm...I'm not so sure I agree there. Outside of Guetzel, Crosby rarely had played with great linemates for long stretches 

  

 

Not necessarily linemates, but Crosby has played on more skilled and well rounded (and better coached teams) hence has had more playoff success, which leads to a lot of people rating him higher than McDavid. But when comparing them at the same stage of their careers, McDavid is a lot more of a dynamic and skilled player. He just hasn't had the luxury of playing on solid rosters and well coached teams to have the playoff success to go along with his individual trophies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Karan said:

 

Not necessarily linemates, but Crosby has played on more skilled and well rounded (and better coached teams) hence has had more playoff success, which leads to a lot of people rating him higher than McDavid. But when comparing them at the same stage of their careers, McDavid is a lot more of a dynamic and skilled player. He just hasn't had the luxury of playing on solid rosters and well coached teams to have the playoff success to go along with his individual trophies.

Yeah that’s fair. Edmonton has never figured out how to assemble a team instead of a group of individuals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Karan said:

 

Not necessarily linemates, but Crosby has played on more skilled and well rounded (and better coached teams) hence has had more playoff success, which leads to a lot of people rating him higher than McDavid. But when comparing them at the same stage of their careers, McDavid is a lot more of a dynamic and skilled player. He just hasn't had the luxury of playing on solid rosters and well coached teams to have the playoff success to go along with his individual trophies.

 

Especially the defense and goaltending those Pitt cup teams had.  Edmonton isn't even close there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Karan said:

 

Not necessarily linemates, but Crosby has played on more skilled and well rounded (and better coached teams) hence has had more playoff success, which leads to a lot of people rating him higher than McDavid. But when comparing them at the same stage of their careers, McDavid is a lot more of a dynamic and skilled player. He just hasn't had the luxury of playing on solid rosters and well coached teams to have the playoff success to go along with his individual trophies.

Yes this is what I meant. I know Crosby has elevated plenty of below average linemates to look really good. But away from his lines he's had much more complete teams able to compete in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDavid is a great individual player, but he has never elevated anyone else above their station.

 

Crosby made Kunitz and Dupuis multi millionaires and NHL household names. 

 

Put it this way... Strome played with McDavid but didn't realize his potential until he played with Panarin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that if you look at the Penguins and Oilers, there is a huge difference in style of play and structure.   Penguins have had solid goaltending, defensive structure, and balanced lineups.  Oilers have played pond hockey and tried to win 6-5.   You can say style of play is due to roster construction and pin it on the general managers rather than the coaches.  But I don't think that you can look at playoff records and say 'Crosby is a winner, a warrior, while McDavid has yet to prove himself.' In the hypothetical where McDavid was on the Penguins, I see the same or more cups as Crosby.  In the hypothetical where Crosby was on the Oilers, I think it is reasonable to posit he wouldn't have any Cups, given the lack of structure, lack of goaltending, and imbalance on the lines.

 

We tend to glorify the athletes that have won championships, and their play and reputation is elevated accordingly.  Are Joe Thorton and Jarome Iginla viewed as better players if they won a Cup?  Probably.  But is it an indictment on their play, or on their supporting cast, or not being on the right team at the right time, for not winning a Cup?

 

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/t/thornjo01.html

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/i/iginlja01.html

 

Hell, Andre Burakovsky is a 2 time Cup winner.  Should we be talking about him as a hockey legend?  Or on being on the right teams at the right times, and making minor contributions during Cup runs?

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/b/burakan01.html

 

NHL Playoffs

 
  • Share & Export
    • Modify, Export & Share Table
    • Get as Excel Workbook
    • Get table as CSV (for Excel)
    • Get Link to Table
    • About Sharing Tools
    • Video: SR Sharing Tools & How-to
    • Video: Stats Table Tips & Tricks
    • Data Usage Terms
  • Glossary
    Scoring     Goals Shots Ice Time              
Season Age Tm Lg   GP G A PTS +/- PIM EV PP SH GW S S% TSA TOI ATOI FOW FOL FO% BLK HIT TK GV
5 yrs   WSH NHL   56 9 9 18 5 12 9 0 0 1 77 11.7 171 689 12:18 5 7 41.7 23 57 23 22
3 yrs   COL NHL   37 11 18 29 9 10 10 1 0 2 47 23.4 107 485 13:07 2 4 33.3 18 23 20 22
Career   8 yrs NHL   93 20 27 47 14 22 19 1 0 3 124 16.1 278 1174 12:37 7 11 38.9 41 80 43 44
2014-15 19 WSH NHL   11 2 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 1 17 11.8 35 137 12:25 1 0 100.0 6 15 4 7
2015-16 20 WSH NHL   12 1 0 1 -1 6 1 0 0 0 16 6.3 47 150 12:32 2 2 50.0 3 10 2 7
2016-17 21 WSH NHL   13 3 3 6 5 2 3 0 0 0 27 11.1 52 186 14:20 1 1 50.0 2 18 11 2
2017-18 22 WSH NHL SC 13 2 4 6 2 4 2 0 0 0 12 16.7 24 139 10:42 0 3 0.0 6 9 5 4
2018-19 23 WSH NHL   7 1 1 2 -3 0 1 0 0 0 5 20.0 13 76 10:54 1 1 50.0 6 5 1 2
2019-20 24 COL NHL   15 7 10 17 7 4 6 1 0 1 24 29.2 43 202 13:27 1 1 50.0 7 10 4 14
2020-21 25 COL NHL   10 1 3 4 -1 4 1 0 0 0 10 10.0 29 135 13:29 1 2 33.3 5 6 6 4
2021-22 26 COL NHL SC 12 3 5 8 3 2 3 0 0 1 13 23.1 35 149 12:25 0 1 0.0 6 7 10 4
  • Cheers 1
  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...