jsm7302 Posted July 16, 2022 Share Posted July 16, 2022 18 hours ago, RichieNextel305 said: Kreider-Zibanejad-Lafreniere Panarin-Trocheck-Kravtsov Blais-Chytil-Kakko Goodrow-Carpenter-Reaves Lindgren-Fox Miller-Trouba Jones-Schneider Shesterkin Halak GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!!! May swap Jones for Hajek but otherwise, I think this is spot on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted July 16, 2022 Share Posted July 16, 2022 KZ - Laf Panarin - Trocheck - Krav Blais - Chytil - Kakko Cuylle - Carp - Goodrow Lindgren - Fox Miller - Trouba Robertson - Schneider … please 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 16, 2022 Share Posted July 16, 2022 1 hour ago, jsm7302 said: GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!!! May swap Jones for Hajek but otherwise, I think this is spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdog99 Posted July 16, 2022 Share Posted July 16, 2022 (edited) 21 hours ago, Pete said: What I want: Kreider-Zibanejad-Lafreniere Panarin-Trocheck-Kravtsov Goodrow-Chytil-Kakko Blais-Carpenter-Cullye Reaves Lindgren-Fox Miller-Trouba Jones-Schneider Robertson What I think GG will go with: Kreider-Zibanejad-Kravtsov Panarin-Trocheck-Kakko Lafreniere-Chytil-Blais Goodrow-Carpenter-Reaves/Cullye Lindgren-Fox Miller-Trouba Hajek-Schneider Jones Funny - put mine together and i come up with exactly your GG lineup, except for flipping Jones & Hajek Edited July 16, 2022 by Jdog99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leetchy2 Posted July 16, 2022 Share Posted July 16, 2022 Kreider - Zib - Blais Bread - Vinnie - Krav Laffy - Chyt - Kakko Cuylle - Carp - Goodrow Lindgren - Fox Miller - Trouba Jones - Schneider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersIn7 Posted July 16, 2022 Share Posted July 16, 2022 I’m honestly more concerned about how the ice time breaks down vs who plays with who. It’s hard to see the kids taking a major step forward if they’re still playing 13 minutes a night and very limited PP time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsm7302 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 I guess Trivigno had a good development camp and may warrant a look moving into the preseason? Lineup I just read projected put the bottom six as: Trivigno-Chytil-Kravtsov Reaves-Goodrow-Blais Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 (edited) 16 minutes ago, jsm7302 said: I guess Trivigno had a good development camp and may warrant a look moving into the preseason? Lineup I just read projected put the bottom six as: Trivigno-Chytil-Kravtsov Reaves-Goodrow-Blais Read where, got a link? Edited July 17, 2022 by Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersIn7 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 21 minutes ago, jsm7302 said: I guess Trivigno had a good development camp and may warrant a look moving into the preseason? Lineup I just read projected put the bottom six as: Trivigno-Chytil-Kravtsov Reaves-Goodrow-Blais He’s only played like a dozen games as a pro. Sure. Take a look. But gotta be a longer shot I’d guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsm7302 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 25 minutes ago, Pete said: Read where, got a link? https://www.foreverblueshirts.com/bobby-trivigno-new-york-rangers-lineup/amp/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, jsm7302 said: https://www.foreverblueshirts.com/bobby-trivigno-new-york-rangers-lineup/amp/ That's a blogger projecting his opinion of "what the Rangers might want to do" haha. I would highly doubt we see him in the top 9 on opening night, or in the NHL at all (for the beginning of the season). If he's there, something else went very, very wrong. Edited July 17, 2022 by Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 Rangers really need that spark plug, little runt with a never ending motor and some speed to constantly annoy the fuck out of defenders. A motte with more youth, energy, speed - and maybe some offense. I mentioned in another thread I’d want to see Trivigno and Henriksson really go hard to compete for a 4th line role, playing as such. (Henriksson has played C before the SHL, so he may have an advantage). the 4th line lacks serious speed last season, and although they could bang around in the offensive zone sometimes, it was also pretty easy for some teams to break out due to their lack of speed. i think both kids could be annoying as fuck to play against, which would add a another element to the bottom 6. (Hunt, with a brain, some ability, and finish) Trivigno had glowing reviews throughout camp for his work ethic and his ability to get scoring chances - but he was also 4 years older than most of the guys there 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 15 minutes ago, josh said: Rangers really need that spark plug, little runt with a never ending motor and some speed to constantly annoy the fuck out of defenders. A motte with more youth, energy, speed - and maybe some offense. I mentioned in another thread I’d want to see Trivigno and Henriksson really go hard to compete for a 4th line role, playing as such. (Henriksson has played C before the SHL, so he may have an advantage). the 4th line lacks serious speed last season, and although they could bang around in the offensive zone sometimes, it was also pretty easy for some teams to break out due to their lack of speed. i think both kids could be annoying as fuck to play against, which would add a another element to the bottom 6. (Hunt, with a brain, some ability, and finish) Trivigno had glowing reviews throughout camp for his work ethic and his ability to get scoring chances - but he was also 4 years older than most of the guys there I don't disagree, I just don't think you get that in a package that's 5'8", 170. Even Motte at 5'10" 190 can't stay healthy at the NHL level trying to play that style. This is him next to Cuylle...Come one. This kid won't be able to shit disturb at the NHL level on a nightly basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 It’s not about wrecking guys, it’s about speed, quickness and getting in there. Cuylle is slow as fuck. They need a guy in there disturbing break outs, relentless on the d, constant pressure. Cuylle doesn’t have the gas tank for that, either . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 24 minutes ago, josh said: It’s not about wrecking guys, it’s about speed, quickness and getting in there. Cuylle is slow as fuck. They need a guy in there disturbing break outs, relentless on the d, constant pressure. Cuylle doesn’t have the gas tank for that, either . No, it's not about wrecking guys, but once he gets there, he's not a threat to separate the man from the puck in any way. IMO, guys that size are only effective in the Gaudreau/Zucc mold, meaning offensive players who are quick, darting and slippery. A 4th line player that size is a waste of a lineup spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 12 minutes ago, Pete said: No, it's not about wrecking guys, but once he gets there, he's not a threat to separate the man from the puck in any way. IMO, guys that size are only effective in the Gaudreau/Zucc mold, meaning offensive players who are quick, darting and slippery. A 4th line player that size is a waste of a lineup spot. Cuylle might be able to separate, but speed (like a Trivigno) might be able to get to the puck first and make a play. Small, fast guys can also be elusive. If Trivigno can be that, they can pair him with bigger size like Goodrow, Reaves, etc. Get to the puck first, make a play, buy time for the slow, big boys to get deep in the zone to cycle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sod16 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 Turk won't go for it, but I like Schneider-Jones as mini version of Lindgren-Fox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 33 minutes ago, rmc51 said: Cuylle might be able to separate, but speed (like a Trivigno) might be able to get to the puck first and make a play. Small, fast guys can also be elusive. If Trivigno can be that, they can pair him with bigger size like Goodrow, Reaves, etc. Get to the puck first, make a play, buy time for the slow, big boys to get deep in the zone to cycle. There's a lot of "ifs" with him. Too many, IMO, for him to make the team out of camp. He's not going to get the chance to show "hey I'm a really good forechecker" in a handful of pre-season games. Figure the last 2 games are tune ups and line combo testing. That leaves 4 games where he'll be splitting opportunities with guys like Sykora, Cullye, Othmann and even the Brodzinskis of the world. It's a lot of competition for those last 4 winger spots when you know 4 roster spots are going to Krav, Blais, Reaves, Goodrow and Carpenter. I just don't see a world where he makes the team, unless injuries come up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Pete said: No, it's not about wrecking guys, but once he gets there, he's not a threat to separate the man from the puck in any way. IMO, guys that size are only effective in the Gaudreau/Zucc mold, meaning offensive players who are quick, darting and slippery. A 4th line player that size is a waste of a lineup spot. That’s not true. Panarin, a small guy, is one of the best forecheckers - when he wants to be. He’s not physical, he’s not fast, but he gets under people and creates havoc and turnovers. In college, he was labeled the poor man’s gaudreau. stop thinking prototypical 4th liners. It’s not 1982. But what he could potentially bring is much missing from the lineup. But once he adjusts, he can move up the lineup in complimentary roles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 48 minutes ago, Pete said: There's a lot of "ifs" with him. Too many, IMO, for him to make the team out of camp. He's not going to get the chance to show "hey I'm a really good forechecker" in a handful of pre-season games. Figure the last 2 games are tune ups and line combo testing. That leaves 4 games where he'll be splitting opportunities with guys like Sykora, Cullye, Othmann and even the Brodzinskis of the world. It's a lot of competition for those last 4 winger spots when you know 4 roster spots are going to Krav, Blais, Reaves, Goodrow and Carpenter. I just don't see a world where he makes the team, unless injuries come up. You listed Cuylle as a 4th liner with Blais and Carpenter. Essentially a poor man’s Kassian. Nah, let him develop and bring him up when he can compliment a line using his size, shot, and physicality. And that’s not with Blais and Carpenter. But I don’t give a fuck if a Trivigno is pigeon holed in a bottom 6 spot. essentially, Trivigno can give you some Sykora now. where Trivigno will make his impression will be in practice, firstly. Showing a Rudy-like attitude. The relentless work ethic is what led to him wearing a C in college. Let the kids develop. Who cares if Trivigno doesn’t become more than a 4th liner, but you can’t turn top draft picks into 4th liners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonybologna Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 I think the rest of the lineup will shake out just fine but one thing I want to see is Krav on the 2nd line RW with Bread and Trocheck, but I have a feeling it'll be Kakko. I just think we've seen Kakko there and it was okay but I think Krav is a much better fit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 1 hour ago, josh said: That’s not true. Panarin, a small guy, is one of the best forecheckers - when he wants to be. He’s not physical, he’s not fast, but he gets under people and creates havoc and turnovers. In college, he was labeled the poor man’s gaudreau. stop thinking prototypical 4th liners. It’s not 1982. But what he could potentially bring is much missing from the lineup. But once he adjusts, he can move up the lineup in complimentary roles. 57 minutes ago, josh said: You listed Cuylle as a 4th liner with Blais and Carpenter. Essentially a poor man’s Kassian. Nah, let him develop and bring him up when he can compliment a line using his size, shot, and physicality. And that’s not with Blais and Carpenter. But I don’t give a fuck if a Trivigno is pigeon holed in a bottom 6 spot. essentially, Trivigno can give you some Sykora now. where Trivigno will make his impression will be in practice, firstly. Showing a Rudy-like attitude. The relentless work ethic is what led to him wearing a C in college. Let the kids develop. Who cares if Trivigno doesn’t become more than a 4th liner, but you can’t turn top draft picks into 4th liners You're confusing what I want with what I think is gonna happen. Management is clearly going for something that isn't small and speedy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Pete said: You're confusing what I want with what I think is gonna happen. Management is clearly going for something that isn't small and speedy. I think management knows they need speed to complement the slower, bigger guys, or Drury wouldn’t have traded for a smaller speedy guy in Motte at the deadline, and Gallant wouldn’t have prioritized playing him. But there’s a reason I left Trivigno off the lineup for what I think GG will do. He’s not a proven commodity like Motte was and he’s not a “GG guy”. Whatever that means other than having played for him before. Maybe he gets a shot to become a GG guy during the season though. Edited July 17, 2022 by rmc51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Pete said: You're confusing what I want with what I think is gonna happen. Management is clearly going for something that isn't small and speedy. No - I agree. But this is the last spot, and they addressed size last offseason. The only other guys under 6’2 are Halak, Lindgren, Fox, Panarin, Trocheck, Hunt… and 6’1 Reaves. i think they’re fine with size. Speed, I’m a bit worried. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsm7302 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 Time will tell with pre season. But between Cuylle, Othmann and Trivigno. Someone may end up snagging a third line LW spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now