Pete Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 Man, he must really love the weather and not winning. 1
Phil Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 20 minutes ago, Pete said: Man, he must really love the weather and not winning. People said the same about Tampa. Now they have two Cups. Florida is really, really good. No reason to think they can't follow in the same footsteps. 1
Sharpshooter Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 Yeah, in all seriousness, I think they are well on their way. The Bobrobsky contract isn't great, but Spencer Knight is looking really good so far. So, they are solidified in that position too.
Phil Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 The Bob contract is horrible. Easily the worst in the entire NHL, and yet, it doesn't even affect them. They not only already have a replacement, but an upgrade, at like a tenth of the price.
Pete Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 11 minutes ago, Phil said: People said the same about Tampa. Now they have two Cups. Florida is really, really good. No reason to think they can't follow in the same footsteps. Really really good teams usually don't win Cups. The reason to think that they can't follow in the same footsteps is that they aren't managed very well.
Albatrosss Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 25 minutes ago, Xander said: How does this impact Zibanjead? it doesnt. he's not getting any of Barkov's money 5
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 If not already, this really caps out Zib at 10m max. I don't know the tax rules and shit, but I don't think there's a chance Zib gets more than Barkov.
siddious Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 5 hours ago, Pete said: Really really good teams usually don't win Cups. The reason to think that they can't follow in the same footsteps is that they aren't managed very well. I'll grant you the Bob signing was beyond stupid but they have one of the better line-ups in the league right now and a great coach. I expect them to be contenders this year.
Blue Heaven Posted October 8, 2021 Author Posted October 8, 2021 $10 million a year in a no-tax state. Barkov would bring home $6.1 million compared to $5.364 million if in NYC. Mika would have to sign for 8y/$86 million....$10.75 million per year to bring home more or less the same as Barkov.....which Mika will not get but shows how much an advantage a no tax state is vs. a high tax state for a superstar
Costa Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 2 hours ago, Blue Heaven said: $10 million a year in a no-tax state. Barkov would bring home $6.1 million compared to $5.364 million if in NYC. Mika would have to sign for 8y/$86 million....$10.75 million per year to bring home more or less the same as Barkov.....which Mika will not get but shows how much an advantage a no tax state is vs. a high tax state for a superstar If you do that, a NMC should be OFF THE TABLE, a non starter.
Keirik Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 2 hours ago, Blue Heaven said: $10 million a year in a no-tax state. Barkov would bring home $6.1 million compared to $5.364 million if in NYC. Mika would have to sign for 8y/$86 million....$10.75 million per year to bring home more or less the same as Barkov.....which Mika will not get but shows how much an advantage a no tax state is vs. a high tax state for a superstar Yeah, I've said this before and have had some different opinions on it. I think the tax rate definitely plays a part in where or why a player might remain or sign somewhere. Is it the only reason?? No, but is it a factor? I think so sometimes.
Sod16 Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 2 hours ago, Blue Heaven said: $10 million a year in a no-tax state. Barkov would bring home $6.1 million compared to $5.364 million if in NYC. Mika would have to sign for 8y/$86 million....$10.75 million per year to bring home more or less the same as Barkov.....which Mika will not get but shows how much an advantage a no tax state is vs. a high tax state for a superstar It looks like you may be are treating all of the income as NY or FLA. It gets broken down by where the games are played, meaning a FLA player pays income taxes on slightly less than half of his income. A NY player will not have to pay taxes on income derived from the approximately 7 games a year in no income tax states and at rates well below those in NY for games played in states with lower rates (such as PA and IL). Also, the players live in Westchester and don't pay NYC income tax, just as commuters don't.
Pete Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 14 minutes ago, Keirik said: Yeah, I've said this before and have had some different opinions on it. I think the tax rate definitely plays a part in where or why a player might remain or sign somewhere. Is it the only reason?? No, but is it a factor? I think so sometimes. It impacts lower salaries more than higher salaries, is it really that much of a difference between 10 million and 11 million dollars?
Phil Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Costa said: If you do that, a NMC should be OFF THE TABLE, a non starter. Doesn’t work like this. No player who gets to free agency, who is married and likely starting a family, is going to willingly give up control over where he plays. You can give him the trade protection or not, but not almost certainly means he'll go somewhere else (that will give it to him).
Albatrosss Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 2 hours ago, Pete said: It impacts lower salaries more than higher salaries, is it really that much of a difference between 10 million and 11 million dollars? Oh yeah
Costa Posted October 8, 2021 Posted October 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Phil said: Doesn’t work like this. No player who gets to free agency, who is married and likely starting a family, is going to willingly give up control over where he plays. You can give him the trade protection or not, but not almost certainly means he'll go somewhere else (that will give it to him). I'm not saying don't give him ANY clause but even if you don't give him one, who's going to take someone making near $10 mil AAV/season??
Long live the King Posted October 9, 2021 Posted October 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, Costa said: I'm not saying don't give him ANY clause but even if you don't give him one, who's going to take someone making near $10 mil AAV/season?? Everyone, 40 goal over page centers aren't common.
Pete Posted October 9, 2021 Posted October 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, Long live the King said: Everyone, 40 goal over page centers aren't common. At the point we'd want out of his contract and want to trade him, he's not a 40 goal Center anymore.
Keirik Posted October 9, 2021 Posted October 9, 2021 5 hours ago, Pete said: It impacts lower salaries more than higher salaries, is it really that much of a difference between 10 million and 11 million dollars? I wish I could relate lol. I just think when player X negotiates and is using comparable contracts, any good negotiation tactic for a GM when the agent says another player makes an extra million would easily be “well and when they are taxed at rate whatever higher it works out less…..”
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now