Morphinity 2.0 Posted August 12, 2020 Share Posted August 12, 2020 Twitter: -- This is a popular thing teams have been doing lately, and I just don't get it. Does it ever result in things getting better? I know Sullivan was just extended, but you've basically voted no confidence in him. Cut your losses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirtyONE Posted August 12, 2020 Share Posted August 12, 2020 I mean... pre covid, the pens were pretty good. This seems like a reaction to a fake playoff series more than anything else. Also, the assistants? Whats the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted August 12, 2020 Share Posted August 12, 2020 Now that I think about this, it could be totally COVID related and people not knowing the state of their finances. 31 Thoughts Podcast has been specualting for awhile that folks' who's contracts are up are going to be in limbo. This could be as simple as they couldn't agree on money and just cut bait. They extended Sullivan last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlairBettsBlocksEverything Posted August 12, 2020 Share Posted August 12, 2020 not sure if anyone else has a subscription to the athletic but this article really shows whats going on in Rutherford;s head (he's pissed) https://theathletic.com/1989307/2020/08/11/gmjr-rips-justin-schultz-and-penguins-leadership-says-changes-are-coming/ some rutherdford quotes/quotes fro article (wont do the whole article to avoid copyright) This was posted just before this news broke: Although there is zero chance Mike Sullivan’s job is in jeopardy, Rutherford refused to commit to the Penguins coaching staff returning intact next season. “There is something wrong,” Rutherford said. “Changes need to be made.” “We get to a certain point in playoff series, and we’re not the same team,” he said. “We don’t have the same drive when we’re up against elimination. It was so disappointing in Game 4. You’re waiting for that desperation. And waiting. It didn’t come in the first period. It didn’t come in the second period. In the third period, it was even worse.” Rutherford said, given the oddity of this year’s postseason, he wouldn’t necessarily have taken the performance as a red flag if it were a one-year sample size. “But it’s happened two years in a row,” he said. “There has been a pattern in each series.” and on Jack Johnson and on Justin Schultz: “Well, they could have been better,” Rutherford said. “I know everybody picks on Jack and they have for a long time, but I think, in that pairing, Justin Schultz had a lot more to give.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LONG LONG LONG TIME FAN Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 Oh! Poor baby is pissed. Who's he gonna blame? Hmmmm....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now