Phil Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 During the ?Headlines? segment on Sportsnet?s Hockey Night in Canada this past Saturday, Elliotte Friedman noted that the market could very well tip in favor of buying teams given the sheer volume of clubs prepared to sell. ?I think there?s a lot of teams that have said they?re sellers and I think they?re worried that unless they have a real difference-maker they?re going to get stuck, because the buyers have the advantage in this market, and that?s rare,? Friedman noted, following Nick Kypreos? updated reports regarding Carolina Hurricanes defenseman Dougie Hamilton and forward Michael Ferland, both of whom have also entered an ever-growing trading mill. ...despite a less than desirable market for sellers, the Rangers remain in control of their own destiny. The only thing they need to do to make sure this doesn?t slip from their grip is to act before their competitors do. This requires that general manager Jeff Gorton not hold the line too long on any given deal if he?s made attractive offers for his players. This doesn?t mean he has to agree to the first offer made, but it does mean he should agree to the first (or second) serious one made. Much like the Michael Grabner trade ? pulled off three days prior to last season?s deadline ? that saw the Rangers trade their then-leading scorer to one of their biggest divisional rivals, Gorton must be willing to accept a good deal when it?s offered to him, regardless of destination. The difference between this and being left out in the cold is, unfortunately, thinner than they?ve probably hoped it would be. If that means entertaining the idea of Mats Zuccarello as a Pittsburgh Penguin, or Kevin Hayes as a member of the Carolina Hurricanes, so be it. As beggars can?t be choosers, neither can sellers be. Not in a buyer?s market. https://www.blueshirtbanter.com/2019/1/14/18181646/buyers-market-could-hamper-new-york-rangers-returns
lefty9 Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 This is where the rangers have to be careful and not give a player like Kreider a way cheaply ,or even HAyes, keep them if the deal isn't worth it
Slobberknocker Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 i posted same in the other thread. if you want to move them, you might have to settle for less than what you are thinking.
BlairBettsBlocksEverything Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 This is where the rangers have to be careful and not give a player like Kreider a way cheaply ,or even HAyes, keep them if the deal isn't worth it For Hayes, I'd say take what you can get. Might be a last minute deal but I can't imagine he wants to stick around a rebuilding team when he's in his prime years. Kreider, we'll have another year to trade for assets. But Hayes offers us nothing beyond the trade deadline.
Vodka Drunkenski Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 Hayes would stick around as long as the money is there
Slobberknocker Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 i just think some will be disappointed over the potential get in the hayes trade
BlairBettsBlocksEverything Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 idk, he'll be 27 and it'll be his one chance to sign a big ticket, long term big money deal. Are we going to want to sign a player for that long during a rebuild? He becomes untradeable at that point if he's got 5+ years at a big number. I doubt he wants to spend his prime on a team going nowhere.
Gravesy Posted January 14, 2019 Posted January 14, 2019 i just think some will be disappointed over the potential get in the hayes trade Oh they will. Some will be seething. But realistically he’ll get a 1st and a prospect, which is a good return for a rental.
siddious Posted January 16, 2019 Posted January 16, 2019 Oh they will. Some will be seething. But realistically he’ll get a 1st and a prospect, which is a good return for a rental. I would be thrilled with a first for hayes. The prospect would be icing. Im hoping Gorton isnt waiting for the deadline either, the sooner you move guys the sooner the rangers start to play worst (at least I think they will)
Mr.wiskers Posted January 20, 2019 Posted January 20, 2019 Rangers have had scouts at Colorado games as per Joe Fortunato Shane Bowers( was coach by Quinn for 1 yr at BU) could be the guy we?re looking at since Colorado does not want to give up Makar or the 1st Rd pick. Kaut is another name that has come up played with Chytil on the Czech team. Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
Phil Posted January 20, 2019 Author Posted January 20, 2019 Rangers have had scouts at Colorado games as per Joe Fortunato Sent from my iPad using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Per Dater. Joe is repeating that info. Link:
Sod16 Posted January 20, 2019 Posted January 20, 2019 Two things seem likely: first, this will go down to the wire like last year when the TB trade was done in the last five minutes; second, returns are not going to be that great and lesser than they have been in the past. I don't think you would get for a guy like Nash what we got for him last year. BTW, McQuaid seems like the archetype of what a contender would like to have in advance of the inevitable decimation of a defense during a cup run. He's the one guy who might bring a little more than expected.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.