Jump to content

  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

Sabres Acquire Jeff Skinner from Hurricanes for Cliff Pu, Picks

Phil
 Share

Recommended Posts

Phil BSBH Legend

Phil

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Im not saying Skinner sucks by any means, but he is one hit away from his career being over. You can't ignore his injuries.

 

So is anyone. One hit can end anyone's career, regardless of the number of concussions they've suffered prior. Sauer had a couple before the NHL. Then Phaneuf.

 

The point is, he's been relatively healthy and has largely carried the Canes' scoring for the last three years.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NYR2711 BSBH Junior

NYR2711

Posted
Posted
So is anyone. One hit can end anyone's career, regardless of the number of concussions they've suffered prior. Sauer had a couple before the NHL. Then Phaneuf.

 

The point is, he's been relatively healthy and has largely carried the Canes' scoring for the last three years.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

 

Yes anyone can, but he is more susceptible than the other players due to his past, and he has had some pretty serious concussions. Sauer had numerous injury issues, and he didn't last very long at the NHL level because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thes5 BSBH Mite

thes5

Posted
Posted

I suppose it was the best deal the Canes got, so they just pulled the trigger.

Replacing his goal scoring is going to be tough, but they are going with youth and are hoping that Svech and Necas pick up the pieces.

I do think they soured on him because he plays a very soft game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Future BSBH Mite

Future

Posted
Posted
Im not saying Skinner sucks by any means, but he is one hit away from his career being over. You can't ignore his injuries.

Games played the last 5 years:

 

82

79

82

77

71

 

Seems fine to me.

 

This was an absolutely horrible trade by the Canes. It's like the Stepan trade in that it was done just for the sake of doing it, but way worse. How do you not get a 1st rounder for a 30-goal scorer? I saw somewhere that they might try to just use those picks, and a whole bunch of others, to send with Faulk to TOR for Nylander/Marner, but who knows if that actually has legs. In a vacuum, this trade is bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Future BSBH Mite

Future

Posted
Posted
Not exactly. They did it to kickstart the rebuild ahead of Stepan's trade clause kicking in; knowing full well that if they didn't, they'd have a helluva time moving him once it did.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

I don't buy that, never did. If they were admitting to a rebuild at that point, then there was no reason for Mac to play a single game as a Ranger last year and signing Shattenkirk was even dumber than I initially thought. There's no reason to give Smith a contract either.

 

They traded Stepan to bring in Shatty, a move that made them different but not worse. They only ended up going full rebuild because they sucked after they couldn't replace Stepan and, even then, they might not get to that point if they're healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
I don't buy that, never did. If they were admitting to a rebuild at that point, then there was no reason for Mac to play a single game as a Ranger last year and signing Shattenkirk was even dumber than I initially thought. There's no reason to give Smith a contract either.

 

They traded Stepan to bring in Shatty, a move that made them different but not worse. They only ended up going full rebuild because they sucked after they couldn't replace Stepan and, even then, they might not get to that point if they're healthy.

 

Here's the way I evaluate that trade:

 

Rangers lose: Stepan, Raanta

Rangers gain: Shattenkirk, Deangelo, 7th overall pick (Andersson)

 

It was a trade that didn't make them better or worse last season, but did give them a couple of futures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pete BSBH Legend

Pete

Posted
Posted
I don't buy that, never did. If they were admitting to a rebuild at that point, then there was no reason for Mac to play a single game as a Ranger last year and signing Shattenkirk was even dumber than I initially thought. There's no reason to give Smith a contract either.

 

They traded Stepan to bring in Shatty, a move that made them different but not worse. They only ended up going full rebuild because they sucked after they couldn't replace Stepan and, even then, they might not get to that point if they're healthy.

 

Here's the way I evaluate that trade:

 

Rangers lose: Stepan, Raanta

Rangers gain: Shattenkirk, Deangelo, 7th overall pick (Andersson)

 

It was a trade that didn't make them better or worse last season, but did give them a couple of futures.

 

Exactly.

 

And as far as signing Shattenkirk, he was obviously was a player they wanted and you have to sign them when they are available.

 

And what were they going to sit McD all year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Future BSBH Mite

Future

Posted
Posted
Here's the way I evaluate that trade:

 

Rangers lose: Stepan, Raanta

Rangers gain: Shattenkirk, Deangelo, 7th overall pick (Andersson)

 

It was a trade that didn't make them better or worse last season, but did give them a couple of futures.

A Stepan for Shattenkirk trade made them immediately worse, b/c Shatty is effectively a bottom-4 defender and they never came even close to replacing Stepan (or, really, replacing Hayes on the third line). They filled one hole with Shatty but made a bigger one at C.

 

Let's say Stepan was a cap dump for futures. You've made that move to build, and then sign Shatty - and still Smith, to a lesser degree - to win now. That's conflicting approaches - it's what's crippled Buffalo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Future BSBH Mite

Future

Posted
Posted
Exactly.

 

And as far as signing Shattenkirk, he was obviously was a player they wanted and you have to sign them when they are available.

 

And what were they going to sit McD all year?

They wanted him to win right away, which, fine. But if you're trading your top center for futures, it makes no sense to spend big money on a UFA to win now. Those moves undermine each other.

 

You could, idk, trade him. It's not like the return was bigger at the deadline than it would have been at the draft. Move Mac and Step at the draft with G buyout, and it's clear from day 1 of the season that they're a rebuilder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...