Phil Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Mobile link: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 GIF or it didnt happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 And then you can post the video tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Heaven Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 :tweet: @DarrenDreger Phaneuf and Thompson for Gaborik and Shore. Sens retain 25% of Phaneuf salary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paddynyc Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Cant wait to see what Kings gave up Sent from my [device_name] using http://Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillyb Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Cant wait to see what Kings gave up :tweet: @DarrenDregerPhaneuf and Thompson for Gaborik and Shore. Sens retain 25% of Phaneuf salary. Just posted above you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindG1000 Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 that feels very wtf to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Heaven Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 that feels very wtf to me. Ottawa wanted to get Phaneuf's salary off the books Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindG1000 Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Ottawa wanted to get Phaneuf's salary off the books But they don't save anything! Unless there's a handshake deal for MG10 to quit after this season, they're on the hook for like...300k less? Trade seems nigh pointless for both sides, imo. Not sure I get this at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlairBettsBlocksEverything Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Gaborik apprently has a higher cap hit but less actual salary. Melnyk's concern is about costs way more than results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindG1000 Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Gaborik apprently has a higher cap hit but less actual salary. Melnyk's concern is about costs way more than results Gaborik's owed just short of 12m. Phaneuf is owed 18m or so, but the Sens held on to 25% of that. For all intents and purposes, the Sens made this move to save $1.75m? They can't honestly think Nick Shore is worth that. Don't really get it from LAs end either - the Gaborik contract isn't awesome, but that Phaneuf contract, even w/salary retained, is just...ugly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 that feels very wtf to me. My reaction exactly. Makes no sense to me from either perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers4Life Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Is it bad that the only reason I?m watching Rangers games is in hopes this happens mid game so I can see it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Sens have no money and save over a million dollars, what doesn't make sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Heaven Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 :tweet:@frank_seravalli My quick math was a little off. It's more significant. Including what players were owed remainder of this season, #Sens will save $5,455,107 in real cash with the transaction - even by eating 25% of Phaneuf contract. Suffice to say, I think this was the key to the deal. Retweeted by Bob McKenzie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 There you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paddynyc Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 I'm surprised that Gaborik didn't have one of those trade clauses in his contract where he can pick teams where he would want to be traded to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 And why did Kings do it? Taking on that horrible contract just to get rid of Gaborik (who was on a better contract)? I dont see Phaneuf helping them much more then what Gaborik could in the playoffs (If they even make it). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Heaven Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 And why did Kings do it? Taking on that horrible contract just to get rid of Gaborik (who was on a better contract)? I dont see Phaneuf helping them much more then what Gaborik could in the playoffs (If they even make it). B/c apparently they need help on D and Gaborik is just about done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.