josh Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 And Varlamov, Rinne, Andersen, Bishop FA, Trotz, FA, FA iirc So, why am I not trading? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 I also believe each was replaced by a younger, better goalie. With the exception of Rinne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 5m gets you Martin Jones, though.FA, Trotz, FA, FA iirc So, why am I not trading?No idea where you're going with either of these, especially the second one...but either way $5 million also gets you Lehner, who's numbers are great, even on a bad team. Either way, we're the one trading the $5million goalie if we had to, so don't know what the Martin Jones comment means. Or the posts on who's an FA. We're so far away from "should we trade Georgiev" that I don't know where we are now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Lehner requires a $6m co pilot and he plays half the games, at most. Contradicts your point. If they have a chance to.trade an nhl backup for assets, all while not getting worse, you do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Lehner requires a $6m co pilot and he plays half the games, at most. Contradicts your point. If they have a chance to.trade an nhl backup for assets, all while not getting worse, you do it. Hard to tell if you're serious. Greiss made 3.3 last year. You're painting yourself in a corner with some serious non facts/points. For the record, I'm on board with trading Georgiev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Lehner is in Chicago behind Crawford. He’s no longer in NY with his previously successful tandem. (They don’t work) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Lehner is in Chicago behind Crawford. He?s no longer in NY with his previously successful tandem. (They don?t work)Wellll, he doesn't REQUIRE a $6 million backup. And the Isles signed Varlamov for the same money, for longer, than Lehner LOL. And Varlamov is older. Safe to say, you don't really have a point about the 1A 1B... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long live the King Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Vasiliev is pretty consistentVasilevskiy? Same SV% as Hank and starts an 8 year contract at $9.5m AAV next year. Sent from my SM-G960U using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Wellll, he doesn't REQUIRE a $6 million backup. And the Isles signed Varlamov for the same money, for longer, than Lehner LOL. And Varlamov is older. Safe to say, you don't really have a point about the 1A 1B... I haven’t seen a 1B. People think shesterkin/Georgiev will be that. I haven’t seen a 1 B. Any relevant replacement of Lundqvist will require a significant salary, so they aren’t saving cap space. Any any short-lived successful platooning is more expensive, and less reliable, long-term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Vasilevskiy? Same SV% as Hank and starts an 8 year contract at $9.5m AAV next year. Sent from my SM-G960U using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk I cap killer IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 5m gets you Martin Jones, though. Gross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersIn7 Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Ok So what’s the desired price and fair market price on Georgiev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Ok So what?s the desired price and fair market price on Georgiev? In a trade, I'd be looking for a 1st round pick or a higher end forward or LHD prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersIn7 Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 In a trade, I'd be looking for a 1st round pick or a higher end forward or LHD prospect. I’d say that’s fair and what they should be shooting for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 And, like Pete mentioned, if you re-sign him, you risk, essentially, losing Shesterkin for nothing. He's got an out clause, and if he goes, not sure he comes back. Via trade, I think you can see a 2nd + change of scenery B prospect. His stats and performance are way too inconsistent to get a 1st, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 And, like Pete mentioned, if you re-sign him, you risk, essentially, losing Shesterkin for nothing. He's got an out clause, and if he goes, not sure he comes back. Via trade, I think you can see a 2nd + change of scenery B prospect. His stats and performance are way too inconsistent to get a 1st, IMO. Yeah I think a #1 may be too rich for him...even at the rate he's playing. I'd take a 2 or a pretty good prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 And, like Pete mentioned, if you re-sign him, you risk, essentially, losing Shesterkin for nothing. He's got an out clause, and if he goes, not sure he comes back. Via trade, I think you can see a 2nd + change of scenery B prospect. His stats and performance are way too inconsistent to get a 1st, IMO. What you describe is Puljujarvi + a 2nd. I would probably do that at the deadline if Puljujarvi comes back over for the Rangers next year. I think he would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersIn7 Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 And, like Pete mentioned, if you re-sign him, you risk, essentially, losing Shesterkin for nothing. He's got an out clause, and if he goes, not sure he comes back. Via trade, I think you can see a 2nd + change of scenery B prospect. His stats and performance are way too inconsistent to get a 1st, IMO. I can see that. But.... Toronto really needs a back up. Way more than they need their 1st round pick next June Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 They don't have their 1st this year. Nor did they last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersIn7 Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 They don't have their 1st this year. Nor did they last year. That’s right. Carolina Totally forgot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirtyONE Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 That’s right. Carolina Totally forgot With them currently out of the playoffs, that trade is looking worse and worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 What you describe is Puljujarvi + a 2nd. I would probably do that at the deadline if Puljujarvi comes back over for the Rangers next year. I think he would. Yes, although I think the Oilers are still waiting for a huge return when they trade Puljujarvi. Are the Oilers looking for a goalie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersIn7 Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Yes, although I think the Oilers are still waiting for a huge return when they trade Puljujarvi. Are the Oilers looking for a goalie? I certainly think they’d take the right one Right now, Georgiev is probably too much for Puljujarvi in real terms. Georgiev is now an established NHL goalie. Puljujarvi is not an established NHL player. Even with a 2nd, not sure I’d do that. They would have to really be in love with Puljujarvi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long live the King Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Our goalie of the future with the shutout tonight. 1.81 GAA .936 SV% on the season. Sent from my SM-G960U using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphinity 2.0 Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 With them currently out of the playoffs, that trade is looking worse and worse. It's lottery protected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now