This is why the analytic model is flawed.
It’s based on shot share, irrespective of where those shots come from and how likely they are to result in goals.
Obviously, the more you shoot from wherever, the more likely you are to score more goals. And while that has value, as does possessing the puck in the o-zone, if it doesn’t manifest in good looks, quality shots, and high danger chances, it’s not so impactful.
They scored a handful more goals in droves of more shots than the Rangers did in the regular season.
And it does nothing to show how efficient a team is offensively.
If you pot your chances consistently and efficiently, the quantity means less.