Of course a debate like this will pull all of the Rangers best 2nd rounders anywhere...vs 2nd rounders over the last decade.
But no one has done the math that matters...5 years without a 2nd rounder.
Regardless, points proven about if the rangers are going for it.
They clearly are. Within their means. It's not black and white. It's grey.
The tea leaves are simply ego.
The thing here is that a single 2nd rounder by itself doesn't hold a great deal of value.
As has been stated, a 2nd rounder statistically has a slightly better than 1 in 3 chance of becoming an NHL player.
However, by the same thinking, 5 years of 2nd round picks should produce at least 1 and possibly 2 NHL players. And 2 NHL calibre players on ELC's with a contending team is worth a lot.
So treating 2nd and 3rd rounders like they're pocket change over time isn't great. Drafting well isn't as important in the NHL as it is in the NFL, for example, but if you put yourself in a position where you take so few swings that you're unable to backstop your roster with decent players on ELC roster construction becomes a lot harder.