Phil Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 I mean, this is exactly why we rotate giving Zibanejad handies. I love bridge deals, but these seem to be setting the Nucks up for failure. Dont get me wrong, both will be great players, and be on amazing deals in year 3. Year 1? idk. Year 2, maybe. Year 4 -12... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted October 1, 2021 Author Share Posted October 1, 2021 To me, the Pettersson one signals he has very little patience left or a waning desire to remain in the market long-term. I know they were cap-crunched, so they couldn't just give him $11 million, but the fact it's for just three years wouldn't exactly be putting my concerns to bed if I were a Nucks fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 Wait - I thought Hughes was 3 years, too. That certainly looks much better. My fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now