BlairBettsBlocksEverything Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Cant imagine Seattle would take him, so this ensures they can protect an extra player not that htey have much, but in my brief, playing with the CapFriendly expansion draft tool, they basically have to choose between exposing Apslund or Bjork. Both of whom I assume they'd like to hold on to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 I mean, why wouldnt he? Can't get worse than Buffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 They're unlikely to claim him, regardless. This just allows them to protect all of Rasmus Asplund, Anders Bjork, and Tage Thompson instead of having to pick two and expose the third. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 I seriously doubt anyone wants that contract!!! He'll be in Buffalo until they buy him out. He didn't even need a NMC with that deal...it was built in as soon as he signed it!!! :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpshooter Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Actually, I would rather play hockey in Seattle than Buffalo, expansion team or not. The Sabres, while they do have some nice talent there, are still kind of a mess. Skinner's contract is bar none the worst in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now