Dunny Posted March 10, 2021 Share Posted March 10, 2021 Kane for Deangelo. Who gets the bigger asshole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted March 10, 2021 Author Share Posted March 10, 2021 What's that even mean? They're buying him out? He's actually having a good year. No, this would be contract termination. Mutually agreed upon, is my guess. I haven't had a chance to read the article fully yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Heaven Posted March 10, 2021 Share Posted March 10, 2021 Probably some loophole where they end his contract, so he's doesn't have any income coming in so he is files bankruptcy so he doesn't have to pay back the money that is owed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted March 10, 2021 Share Posted March 10, 2021 I assume this is a 'loophole' in his bankruptcy case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4EverRangerFrank Posted March 10, 2021 Share Posted March 10, 2021 Wow! This is not an option available to 99.9% of people heading through bankruptcy. When have you ever heard of an employer terminating your future salary like it reads in this instance? I'm not an attorney but me thinks a shrewd attorney dreamed up this scheme and it will likely work to discharge the preponderance of his debt...as long as the employer is a willing participant. Holy smoke. Court actions amaze me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 Wow! This is not an option available to 99.9% of people heading through bankruptcy. When have you ever heard of an employer terminating your future salary like it reads in this instance? I'm not an attorney but me thinks a shrewd attorney dreamed up this scheme and it will likely work to discharge the preponderance of his debt...as long as the employer is a willing participant. Holy smoke. Court actions amaze me. that's some bullsh!t if that's the case and it sure smells like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sod16 Posted March 11, 2021 Share Posted March 11, 2021 I think his creditors will be able to swat this down like a bug. It would be a manipulation to get a discharge and then re-sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 Evander Kane files motion claiming lenders wishes violate 13th Amendment Evander Kane's bankruptcy case took another turn Thursday night as the San Jose Sharks winger filed a petition claiming his creditors' attempts to convert his case violated the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution's prohibition against involuntary servitude. Five lenders, including Zions Bancorp., are seeking to convert Kane's case under the bankruptcy code from Chapter 7, which would only force him to pay creditors using current assets, to Chapter 11, which would place the remaining years of his Sharks contract under their control and allow them to garnish his wages. https://theathletic.com/news/evander-kane-files-motion-claiming-lenders-wishes-would-violate-13th-amendment/W44kVAy304GG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 You can only garnish a certain amount of wages... unless he really fucked up his contract when negotiating. 1099 contractors can have everything and anything garnished when they owe the government money, but still not all if its a private lender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now