Phil Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Link: https://twitter.com/sportsnetspec/status/1096626282845089798?s=21 Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravesy Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 I'd take a chance on him if the price is right. I think they might be expecting too much for him though. How about the change of scenery trade we talked about re Andersson, Phil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Pionk, straight up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 16, 2019 Author Share Posted February 16, 2019 I'd take a chance on him if the price is right. I think they might be expecting too much for him though. How about the change of scenery trade we talked about re Andersson, Phil? Yeah, that's what I was thinking. Andersson for Pul straight up. Our problem for yours. EDM gets a better soldier. Rangers get more potential upside. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 I don't think they do that just because of contract status. They have Andersson 2 more years on ELC, they'd have to pay Pulujarvi now and he leaves your control sooner. And likely give more to EDM. Doesn't seem like it makes sense. But I'd do it, rather have a winger with size who can skate than a smallish center who can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Would rather trade an older player/contract than any kid, at this point. Not sure Oilers do Andersson for Puljuj?rvi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.