Phil Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 Mobile link: -- Life comes at you fast. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 How were the ratings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted May 30, 2018 Author Share Posted May 30, 2018 Through the roof. They made a strong moral choice on this and are being applauded for it, and its timely nature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliveIn94 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Whole thing is pretty dumb tbh. Never liked the show or Roseanne, but now the other actors lost a big payday. Sent from my [device_name] using http://Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Through the roof. They made a strong moral choice on this and are being applauded for it, and its timely nature.Good. Consumers expect brands to have a POV. But also, a stronger statement could have been made by saying we can do this without you. They should have just immediately written her out of the show. It's not fair to her co-actors that they lose jobs because she's retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Agreed, definitely unfair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted May 30, 2018 Author Share Posted May 30, 2018 Good. Consumers expect brands to have a POV. But also, a stronger statement could have been made by saying we can do this without you. They should have just immediately written her out of the show. It's not fair to her co-actors that they lose jobs because she's retarded. I agree in principle, but how the hell do you do Roseanne without Roseanne? She's the title character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted May 30, 2018 Author Share Posted May 30, 2018 Friend of mine suggested this on Facebook: "I think they should kill off Roseanne, but keep the show going about the rest of the family, just change the name to "Darlene". It makes sense. The season ended with Roseanne going to get a knee replacement. They could say she had a heart attack on the table & died, which happens in real life. Then maybe Jackie moves in to help Dan, Darlene and her kids. Basically shift emphasis to Darlene, but keep Dan, Jackie, and Becky around. DJ can stay or go, i don't care. That's my pitch ABC!" Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 I’m sure Roseanne owns certain rights to every part of it, including spin offs or whatnot. She’s not an idio...oh, wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYR2711 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Friend of mine suggested this on Facebook: "I think they should kill off Roseanne, but keep the show going about the rest of the family, just change the name to "Darlene". It makes sense. The season ended with Roseanne going to get a knee replacement. They could say she had a heart attack on the table & died, which happens in real life. Then maybe Jackie moves in to help Dan, Darlene and her kids. Basically shift emphasis to Darlene, but keep Dan, Jackie, and Becky around. DJ can stay or go, i don't care. That's my pitch ABC!" Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk They attempted this with Kevin Can Wait, they killed off his wife and replaced her with Leah Remi as his work partner and the show tanked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.