Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would be interested in the fancy stats for this game, expected goals, dangerous chances, etc.  40+ shots sounds impressive but I don’t remember many quality chances since the end of the first for the Rangers

Posted
1 minute ago, fletch said:

I would be interested in the fancy stats for this game, expected goals, dangerous chances, etc.  40+ shots sounds impressive but I don’t remember many quality chances since the end of the first for the Rangers

Haven’t you seen enough shit tonight?

  • LMFAO 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, fletch said:

I would be interested in the fancy stats for this game, expected goals, dangerous chances, etc.  40+ shots sounds impressive but I don’t remember many quality chances since the end of the first for the Rangers

Rangers: 

Corsi: 71, Fenwick: 55, Shots: 41, Scoring Chances: 37, High Danger Chances: 20, Expected Goals: 4.57

 

Islanders:

Corsi: 53, Fenwick: 39, Shots: 29, Scoring Chances: 28, High Danger Chances: 9, Expected Goals: 2.82

Edited by Karan
  • VINNY! 1
Posted
Just now, josh said:


but but but last year they scored on the PP… 

 

I mean Gallant made the terrific adjustment to keep Panarin off the left boards in favor of Zibanejad last year. Did wonders for the PP on the season, but I want to say it was forced at first with a Panarin injury and Zib absolutely lit it up in that spot so GG stuck with it to his credit. Going to have to get creative to keep PKs on their toes

Posted

They didn't rely this heavily on the Mika one-timer last year, now it's their only PP move so of course the opposing team just glues a guy onto him and they're lost. I think we need a better shot on the point.

  • VINNY! 1
Posted
Just now, Karan said:

Rangers: 

Corsi: 51, Fenwick: 42, Shots: 32, Scoring Chances: 28, High Danger Chances: 15, Expected Goals: 3.26

 

Islanders:

Corsi: 39, Fenwick: 28, Shots: 20, Scoring Chances: 21, High Danger Chances: 7, Expected Goals: 1.89

 

Contrary to the belief that's spreading in the GDTs, they have not played bad hockey. They are generating many, many chances, but just have not been able to finish them the last few games.

  • Like 1
  • Bullseye 1
  • Believe 1
Posted

Gotta ride Shesterkin for as long as possible with a sprinkle of Halak. None of this bullshit that Shesterkin can’t play 2 out of 3 games. It’s 3 weeks into the season, this is as fresh as he will be. He is capable of playing back to backs every once in awhile. 

  • Keeps it 100 1
Posted
Just now, Blue Heaven said:

Gotta ride Shesterkin for as long as possible with a sprinkle of Halak. None of this bullshit that Shesterkin can’t play 2 out of 3 games. It’s 3 weeks into the season, this is as fresh as he will be. He is capable of playing back to backs every once in awhile. 

I don’t get why Halak played Sunday. We know Gallant hates playing Igor back to back. But at some point the kid wheels need to come off.

Posted

Puck just won’t go in and they’re obviously tilted about it. That’s good, shows some emotion about the situation, but the message is really keep at it and the puck is going to cooperate at some point. 

Posted
Just now, RichieNextel305 said:

We have scored a grand total of 2 goals this season with him in net. 2.

 

Dominik Hasek could have been in goal tonight. Can’t win if you don’t score.

Yes, but I want to talk shit about Halak tonight. 

Posted
Just now, RichieNextel305 said:

I don’t get why Halak played Sunday. We know Gallant hates playing Igor back to back. But at some point the kid wheels need to come off.

GG playing Halak vs CBJ f’d up this whole week of games. Made no sense to give Shesterkin 4 days off. 

  • Keeps it 100 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RichieNextel305 said:

We have scored a grand total of 2 goals this season with him in net. 2.

 

Dominik Hasek could have been in goal tonight. Can’t win if you don’t score.

 

Definitely...but why can't both things be true? lol

Posted
1 minute ago, 4EverRangerFrank said:

The only shit worse than this is the Hallmark Channel and their ‘Christmas in Summer’ movies. 

At least hallmark movies usually have some good looking ladies. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, josh said:

Haven’t you seen enough shit tonight?

Glutton for punishment.  Not ready yet for ‘on to Dallas’. long break between games to over analyze instead of just flushing this one like the athletes will.

Posted
Just now, Valriera said:

Watch we will light them up with one of the better goalies in the league lol 

They had issues scoring against the backup or even third string goalie of Columbus. Hopes are not high.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...