jsm7302 Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 Just now, josh said: Can’t do 4 years. He’s never healthy (which is why you have Hunt). Meh....we can pass if it is going to be an issue with his ability to stay healthy. Not worth the salary if that is the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 10 minutes ago, The Dude said: You're splitting hairs on 750k. The difference between the 2 players is massive. Ditch Hunt, keep Motte. Win win. Addition by subtraction. Motte is an energy player. If it were so easy to find another Motte, the Rangers would have had such a player already and wouldn't constantly be looking for him. I don't go into a bidding war over him, but if he'll accept 1.5 X4 you gotta sign him. BTW, what's "har had had" mean? Of course I’m splitting hairs on 750k. There’s a salary cap in the NHL and we aren’t a team with a fuck ton of room with a lot of big contracts on the team all with clauses that keep them here. The difference between using the extra 750k on a necessity rather than a luxury is even more massive than using for a 4th line role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 8 minutes ago, Keirik said: Of course I’m splitting hairs on 750k. There’s a salary cap in the NHL and we aren’t a team with a fuck ton of room with a lot of big contracts on the team all with clauses that keep them here. The difference between using the extra 750k on a necessity rather than a luxury is even more massive than using for a 4th line role. 750 isn't going to break the team. They aren't or shouldn't be carrying as many roster players as they did this season. I think a quality energy guy is a necessity. Especially one that wants to be here. Didn't they just hand a massive contract to fucking Goodrow to be just that? And you're going to tell me 1.5 is a luxury the Rangers can't afford? After a ridicilous contract given to Goodrow... The Dude fit. He was a god damn missle out there. A refreshing break from Rooney and Hunt. 750 is nothing. Anyway, if the Rangers did what I suggest and not sign a 2 C, and go with the kid line, there is plenty of space. I feel another way to save some money is to go with some little known, or random back up goalies. Get them in under a mill and rotate in and out from the minors. We had an inconsistent asshole as backup the last few years. What's the difference? Save money there. A good back up is a luxury too.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 49 minutes ago, The Dude said: 750 isn't going to break the team. They aren't or shouldn't be carrying as many roster players as they did this season. I think a quality energy guy is a necessity. Especially one that wants to be here. Didn't they just hand a massive contract to fucking Goodrow to be just that? And you're going to tell me 1.5 is a luxury the Rangers can't afford? After a ridicilous contract given to Goodrow... The Dude fit. He was a god damn missle out there. A refreshing break from Rooney and Hunt. 750 is nothing. Anyway, if the Rangers did what I suggest and not sign a 2 C, and go with the kid line, there is plenty of space. I feel another way to save some money is to go with some little known, or random back up goalies. Get them in under a mill and rotate in and out from the minors. We had an inconsistent asshole as backup the last few years. What's the difference? Save money there. A good back up is a luxury too.. It's not about breaking them. It's about the difference between an AHL backup and say a Halak at 1.5m or so. Im sorry. I'd love Motte, but until every other need is filled, he's just not even remotely important enough to prioritize. In no way shape or form would it be smart roster management to just disregard the importance of a backup goalie because we desperately need Tyler Motte. Shesty has never played more than 53 games in the regular season. He's also battled injuries each year. We all hate Geo, but the answer to replace him definitely isn't rotating career minor leaguers. Do that for Tyler Motta? Really? No way. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsm7302 Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 10 hours ago, The Dude said: 750 isn't going to break the team. They aren't or shouldn't be carrying as many roster players as they did this season. I think a quality energy guy is a necessity. Especially one that wants to be here. Didn't they just hand a massive contract to fucking Goodrow to be just that? And you're going to tell me 1.5 is a luxury the Rangers can't afford? After a ridicilous contract given to Goodrow... The Dude fit. He was a god damn missle out there. A refreshing break from Rooney and Hunt. 750 is nothing. Anyway, if the Rangers did what I suggest and not sign a 2 C, and go with the kid line, there is plenty of space. I feel another way to save some money is to go with some little known, or random back up goalies. Get them in under a mill and rotate in and out from the minors. We had an inconsistent asshole as backup the last few years. What's the difference? Save money there. A good back up is a luxury too.. Que up Jed Ortmeyer!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWantsTheCup Posted June 26, 2022 Share Posted June 26, 2022 Giving Motte 1.5M wouldn’t be a big deal if we could move Nemeth and didn’t feel the need to give Reaves a raise when we got him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 29, 2022 Author Share Posted June 29, 2022 Quote Motte Girl Summer starts early for the Rangers, as Mollie Walker is reporting that the Rangers and Tyler Motte are expected to reach a contract agreement. Quote With both Ryan Strome and Andrew Copp seemingly pricing themselves out of New York, the Rangers looked to solidify their fourth line, hopefully into a true shutdown line. Motte had an expected contract, per Evolving Hockey, of one year at $990k or four years at $2.9 million. We will see what the contract terms are, if and when he re-signs. https://blueseatblogs.com/2022/06/29/motte-girl-summer-tyler-sign-rangers/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWantsTheCup Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 Motte for 4 years at .725M is a no brainer. If that’s all he wants sign him already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 12 minutes ago, RJWantsTheCup said: Motte for 4 years at .725M is a no brainer. If that’s all he wants sign him already. It’s $2.9M per year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWantsTheCup Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 1 minute ago, rmc51 said: It’s $2.9M per year. 1 minute ago, rmc51 said: It’s $2.9M per year. That makes no sense why would 1 year be 990K and 4 years be 2.9M per year? More years should be less per year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 36 minutes ago, Phil said: https://blueseatblogs.com/2022/06/29/motte-girl-summer-tyler-sign-rangers/ I Love Motte Especially At $990k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 14 minutes ago, RJWantsTheCup said: That makes no sense why would 1 year be 990K and 4 years be 2.9M per year? More years should be less per year. To sign him long term requires buying his potential. 4 years buys most of his prime years. If he doesn’t get what he thinks he is worth this year, he will probably sign a cheaper 1 year deal to boost his value up for next summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWantsTheCup Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 5 minutes ago, rmc51 said: To sign him long term requires buying his potential. 4 years buys most of his prime years. If he doesn’t get what he thinks he is worth this year, he will probably sign a cheaper 1 year deal to boost his value up for next summer. He made 1.225M this year. Don’t think he’s worth 2.9M a season. I’d gamble and just sign him to 990K for a year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted June 30, 2022 Share Posted June 30, 2022 2 hours ago, rmc51 said: It’s $2.9M per year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 30, 2022 Author Share Posted June 30, 2022 2 hours ago, RJWantsTheCup said: He made 1.225M this year. Don’t think he’s worth 2.9M a season. I’d gamble and just sign him to 990K for a year. Honestly, another $3 million bottom-six player would really fuck the short- and long-term cap projections. He's a good player, but this isn't how you build a contender. Contending teams don't invest this much in role players. They get guys to come to them on bargains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted June 30, 2022 Share Posted June 30, 2022 Hell no at 2.9, that's brutal and I like the guy. If I was Drury I would hang up the phone and change my number. You just can't do anything close to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsm7302 Posted June 30, 2022 Share Posted June 30, 2022 Mitte at 2.9, Goodrow at 3.whatever.......that fourth line is PRICEY! Looks like we will only be able to afford Jonny Brodzinski to center our 2nd line...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 13, 2022 Author Share Posted July 13, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJWantsTheCup Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Going with Kreider Zibanejad Lafraniere Panarin Trochek Kravtsov Goodrow Chytil Kakko Othman Rydahl Blais Reaves 13th Forward Launching Dry Heaves & Goat Piss Lindgren Fox Miller Trouba Jones Schneider Shesterkin Halak Leaves 1.15 to sign a 7th D if my cap friendly arm chair gm is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cash or Czech Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, Cash or Czech said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 28 minutes ago, Cash or Czech said: Simple really. You shouldn’t allocate that much more cap to a 4th line player when you have mid-6 needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 13, 2022 Author Share Posted July 13, 2022 44 minutes ago, rmc51 said: Simple really. You shouldn’t allocate that much more cap to a 4th line player when you have mid-6 needs. This. Was a nice player, but they just can't afford him. Go get paid somewhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew a Penalty Posted July 13, 2022 Share Posted July 13, 2022 Really wanted to keep Motte, but I understand the cap situation. The Rangers also have guys like Berard and Sykora in the system who are supposed to offer a similar element to their game. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted July 13, 2022 Author Share Posted July 13, 2022 Just now, Drew a Penalty said: Really wanted to keep Motte, but I understand the cap situation. The Rangers also have guys like Berard and Sykora in the system who are supposed to offer a similar element to their game. Who is way sexier, anyway. Like, come on, bro. Guy is drowning in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now