phillyb Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 Hahha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBrowningPI Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 He should be the happiest guy on the team, knowing he's getting off the Titanic. Sent from my SM-N900T using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 I don't think we'd even get a stick rack for him any more...his value right now is about equal to his effort; DOG SHIT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 The other thing to consider, with Zucc's value, is that there are only going to be 4-5 teams buying wingers, and he's not the best of the bunch. Depending on who is selling: Stone - OTT Silvferberg - ANA Nyquist - DET Johansson - NJD Simmonds - PHI They could all be more valuable than Zucc, depending on what a team needs. But anyone who wants a top-6 playmaker would prefer Nyquist, Two-Way Silvferberg, PWF Simmonds, 4th liner Johansson...etc. etc. I can't see a scenario where Zucc is better than a team's 3rd choice. Now maybe some will say that Zucc for a third is better than Nyquist for a 1st, but I think that's the market for Zucc right now. There's just a lot of expiring winger contracts on bad teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 I still think they tried to trade Zuccarello last season and didnt get a first. I don't think that will change this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fletch Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 The other thing to consider, with Zucc's value, is that there are only going to be 4-5 teams buying wingers, and he's not the best of the bunch. Depending on who is selling: Stone - OTT Silvferberg - ANA Nyquist - DET Johansson - NJD Simmonds - PHI They could all be more valuable than Zucc, depending on what a team needs. But anyone who wants a top-6 playmaker would prefer Nyquist, Two-Way Silvferberg, PWF Simmonds, 4th liner Johansson...etc. etc. I can't see a scenario where Zucc is better than a team's 3rd choice. Now maybe some will say that Zucc for a third is better than Nyquist for a 1st, but I think that's the market for Zucc right now. There's just a lot of expiring winger contracts on bad teams. I don't know enough about Johansson, but Stone, Silfverberg, Nyquist, and Simmonds are all more attractive to GMs, IMO, than Zuccarello Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravesy Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 The other thing to consider, with Zucc's value, is that there are only going to be 4-5 teams buying wingers, and he's not the best of the bunch. Depending on who is selling: Stone - OTT Silvferberg - ANA Nyquist - DET Johansson - NJD Simmonds - PHI They could all be more valuable than Zucc, depending on what a team needs. But anyone who wants a top-6 playmaker would prefer Nyquist, Two-Way Silvferberg, PWF Simmonds, 4th liner Johansson...etc. etc. I can't see a scenario where Zucc is better than a team's 3rd choice. Now maybe some will say that Zucc for a third is better than Nyquist for a 1st, but I think that's the market for Zucc right now. There's just a lot of expiring winger contracts on bad teams. I agree. A Grabner-ish return looks good at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LONG LONG LONG TIME FAN Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 New whipping boy. Some people!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 The other thing to consider, with Zucc's value, is that there are only going to be 4-5 teams buying wingers, and he's not the best of the bunch. Depending on who is selling: Stone - OTT Silvferberg - ANA Nyquist - DET Johansson - NJD Simmonds - PHI They could all be more valuable than Zucc, depending on what a team needs. But anyone who wants a top-6 playmaker would prefer Nyquist, Two-Way Silvferberg, PWF Simmonds, 4th liner Johansson...etc. etc. I can't see a scenario where Zucc is better than a team's 3rd choice. Now maybe some will say that Zucc for a third is better than Nyquist for a 1st, but I think that's the market for Zucc right now. There's just a lot of expiring winger contracts on bad teams. I don't think Johansson and Simmonds bring much at all, sadly neither will Zucc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 I don't think Johansson and Simmonds bring much at all, sadly neither will Zucc. If my team was truly a contender I'd give up a late first for Simmonds. He brings everything that championship teams need. Zucc? Not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Simmonds will be a hot commodity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 I don't think Johansson and Simmonds bring much at all, sadly neither will Zucc. Well it just depends, though I think Simmonds would get a pretty solid return. But the point is that there are teams who might prefer them to Zucc, really limiting the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Most Flyers fans can't with for Simmonds to be moved and expect a low value return but they want him gone . He's been floating around all season with some going as far as suggesting he's playing hurt, again. Sent from my [device_name] using http://Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Most Flyers fans can't with for Simmonds to be moved and expect a low value return but they want him gone . He's been floating around all season with some going as far as suggesting he's playing hurt, again. Sent from my [device_name] using http://Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk I mean maybe. But goals are valuable, and he's pacing 20+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4EverRangerFrank Posted January 9, 2019 Author Share Posted January 9, 2019 I've always liked Simmonds edge to his game plus he has a great shot. That said, I do not want an injury on the roster. If he's nursing something, then he better come real cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 I've always liked Simmonds edge to his game plus he has a great shot. That said, I do not want an injury on the roster. If he's nursing something, then he better come real cheap. Oh, I don't think anyone is saying that they want him on the Rangers. What would be the point of that? I was saying that if I had a true contending team, a la Tampa Bay or Toronto, I would be all in on him. Definitely over Zucc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Most Flyers fans can't with for Simmonds to be moved and expect a low value return but they want him gone . He's been floating around all season with some going as far as suggesting he's playing hurt, again. Sent from my [device_name] using http://Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by TapatalkFan opinion isn't a barometer of anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.