Page 484 of 521 FirstFirst ... 384434474482483484485486494 ... LastLast
Results 9,661 to 9,680 of 10404

Thread: General Political Thread: News, Slander & Debate

  1. #9661
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Maher has been saying this for awhile.

    Neither Bush nor Trump won the popular vote. Garland should be a SCOTUS, and great chance the court would be 8/2 liberal tilt.

    The will of the majority is not reflected here.
    Which would, surprising as it may seem, actually reflect the will of the people. Despite the current state of affairs, the majority of Americans are for liberal policies and principles like the expansion of Medicare, a favorable view on immigration, gun control laws, same-sex marriage, abortion rights, etc.

    http://prospect.org/article/most-ame...80%99t-know-it
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  2. #9662
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,788
    Rep Power
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    Which would, surprising as it may seem, actually reflect the will of the people. Despite the current state of affairs, the majority of Americans are for liberal policies and principles like the expansion of Medicare, a favorable view on immigration, gun control laws, same-sex marriage, abortion rights, etc.

    http://prospect.org/article/most-ame...80%99t-know-it
    I agree with you in part. The main thing is the way people think it should be done, and that is the main issues people have with both sides.

  3. #9663
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,788
    Rep Power
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Maher has been saying this for awhile.

    Neither Bush nor Trump won the popular vote. Garland should be a SCOTUS, and great chance the court would be 8/2 liberal tilt.

    The will of the majority is not reflected here.
    The problem is that this court shouldn't be liberal or conservative. You can't rule fairly when you feel one way or anther. These judges should be impartial and not be on one side or the other. This is why I hate that the President picks the judge, because both sides put in their guy who supports them, so no one is really impartial on the Supreme Court.

  4. #9664
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR2711 View Post
    The problem is that this court shouldn't be liberal or conservative. You can't rule fairly when you feel one way or anther. These judges should be impartial and not be on one side or the other. This is why I hate that the President picks the judge, because both sides put in their guy who supports them, so no one is really impartial on the Supreme Court.
    No, the judges should aspire to be impartial. They can't, in actuality, be impartial. No one can. It's like telling someone not to have biases. They're intrinsic to our nature. Acting on them isn't, however, which is why it's so, so, so, so, so incredibly important to not do this during a Senate Confirmation hearing.

    Let's not rewrite history to suggest that all appointments, or would-be ones (cough*Merrick Garland*cough) are equally guilty of flagrant displays of partisanship.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  5. #9665
    HNIC BSBH Legend
    Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    77,679
    Rep Power
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR2711 View Post
    The problem is that this court shouldn't be liberal or conservative. You can't rule fairly when you feel one way or anther. These judges should be impartial and not be on one side or the other. This is why I hate that the President picks the judge, because both sides put in their guy who supports them, so no one is really impartial on the Supreme Court.
    No, impartiality isn't the issue. Conservativism or liberalism is about how you interpret the Constitution. There is no one is the world who's completely centrist on every issue.

  6. #9666
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR2711 View Post
    I agree with you in part. The main thing is the way people think it should be done, and that is the main issues people have with both sides.
    The way what should be done? This system has, by and large, not changed in like 200 years. We are designed to elect representatives who perform their duties based on the will of the People (majority).

    Those who abuse this ought to be impeached and/or voted out of office immediately, and remedied by voting in those who do not. Even if every single DC politician was guilty of this, to whatever degree, it would still hold true.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  7. #9667
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    No, impartiality isn't the issue. Conservativism or liberalism is about how you interpret the Constitution. There is no one is the world who's completely centrist on every issue.
    Centrism, in this case, is an untenable position. It would suggest doing nothing, repeatedly. Like asking for the Supreme Court to become the Supreme Fence. Take your seats, justices, and never waver.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  8. #9668
    Moderator Junior Division
    Future's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    7,619
    Rep Power
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    It doesn't have to be, Mike. It's representative of the State. That's why we send Senators and representatives from each, not from each county, or area.

    If the 10+ million people who live north of Dutchess are upset by something, let them voice that opinion and seek local representation who can also speak on their behalf. If their gripe is valid, there's little reason it shouldn't be adopted by the State.

    The same would hold true of every other major metropolitan city where — shocker — the majority of the population of the country happen to live.



    Your pessimism is palpable. Anything else you wish to declare without evidence, Donald?

    By preferring a popular vote, I'm giving voice to the will of the majority. Not the will of the gerrymandered, voter-suppression-fueled elected minority leaders of a minority populus.

    But, by all means, explain to me why the Dakotas (of which there need not be two) send the same number of representatives as California, who are the fifth-largest economy in the fucking world.
    In New York, it is not representative of the state. The voting public is representative of downstate. Cuomo won 11 of 57 counties against Astorino, including Albany, Buffalo, Syracuse and Binghamton. He didn't even fucking win Monroe lol.

    You're not giving to the will of the majority. You're giving it to the will of population-dense, single-minded areas. And don't dismiss it based on "without evidence." Hilary, Booker, Cuomo, etc. will support the 1% from Wall St., healthcare, real estate, etc. give them tax breaks/favorible legislation while giving greater govt. support to low-income people in those areas. That money will absolutely come from middle class workers outside of those regions...you know it's what would and does happen, don't be obtuse. It's why upstate NY population is declining every year.

    I didn't say the electoral college is perfect. But acting like a pure popular vote is a good idea is a middle finger to less population dense, middle class areas.

  9. #9669
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    rmc51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,072
    Rep Power
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    What bad idea could this not be used to support? What if someone believes homosexuality is a cardinal sin?
    One involves the taking of human life (from their viewpoint) and the other does not.

  10. #9670
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Future View Post
    In New York, it is not representative of the state. The voting public is representative of downstate. Cuomo won 11 of 57 counties against Astorino, including Albany, Buffalo, Syracuse and Binghamton. He didn't even fucking win Monroe lol.
    It is representative of the state. The population. Not the districts.

    You're not giving to the will of the majority. You're giving it to the will of population-dense, single-minded areas. And don't dismiss it based on "without evidence." Hilary, Booker, Cuomo, etc. will support the 1% from Wall St., healthcare, real estate, etc. give them tax breaks/favorible legislation while giving greater govt. support to low-income people in those areas. That money will absolutely come from middle class workers outside of those regions...you know it's what would and does happen, don't be obtuse. It's why upstate NY population is declining every year.
    Ipso facto, the majority. The majority of the people in any given state live in population-dense cities.

    As to the rest, the answer is simple: vote them out and vote in those who reflect your values.

    I didn't say the electoral college is perfect. But acting like a pure popular vote is a good idea is a middle finger to less population dense, middle class areas.
    Except that it isn't, because it would better reflect the will of the People. A popular vote isn't perfect either. But it's marketdly improved over the idea of allowing gerrymandered districts, racked with voter suppression tactics, to determine who gets to represent any given State or even the nation. Especially given the political climate since Bush. That concept is helping to keep a minority group, who represent a minority vote, in power — power that is being weilded to not pass legislation that the majority of Americans want.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  11. #9671
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by rmc51 View Post
    One involves the taking of human life (from their viewpoint) and the other does not.
    Uh, have you never read a single news report from the Middle East? Homosexuals are slaughtered for being homosexuals every day.

    Also, "human life" is a relative, nebulous term in the case of abortion. It's why there's an entire debate on the definition of "conception" and "when does life begin?"
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  12. #9672
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,788
    Rep Power
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    No, the judges should aspire to be impartial. They can't, in actuality, be impartial. No one can. It's like telling someone not to have biases. They're intrinsic to our nature. Acting on them isn't, however, which is why it's so, so, so, so, so incredibly important to not do this during a Senate Confirmation hearing.

    Let's not rewrite history to suggest that all appointments, or would-be ones (cough*Merrick Garland*cough) are equally guilty of flagrant displays of partisanship.
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    No, impartiality isn't the issue. Conservativism or liberalism is about how you interpret the Constitution. There is no one is the world who's completely centrist on every issue.
    When you have Judges coming out and giving their opinion on party lines, thats an issue in my eyes for a supreme court justice to act, and it happens on both sides. Your opinion shouldn't matter, and the process of picking one is one that is very political instead of picking one thats best for the people. I get no one is completely centrist, but they also shouldn't be voicing their opinions to the public on candidates or political preferences publicly. You shouldn't have someone that is more liberal or conservative as a justice, they should be more center than left or right, but that doesn't happen. This is just my 2 cents.

  13. #9673
    Russian Meddling BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    28,215
    Rep Power
    346
    We’ve tried to stop the spread of such horrific thoughts and practices in this country. I believe you complaint about that, too
    Lias Andersson for #AJT2019

  14. #9674
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,788
    Rep Power
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    The way what should be done? This system has, by and large, not changed in like 200 years. We are designed to elect representatives who perform their duties based on the will of the People (majority).

    Those who abuse this ought to be impeached and/or voted out of office immediately, and remedied by voting in those who do not. Even if every single DC politician was guilty of this, to whatever degree, it would still hold true.

    The way medicare or gun laws should be. You may feel one way while I feel another, and that is the problem. Everyone wants gun laws, but its the way we see them that is the issue. Everyone thinks their way is the correct way, when in fact its more of a mix of both ideas that will work the most. People are so divided on issues and fight with the other side more than they listen, and this is why we will never have any of these things like free medicare for all, truly good gun laws, immigration policies figured out.

  15. #9675
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    rmc51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,072
    Rep Power
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    Uh, have you never read a single news report from the Middle East? Homosexuals are slaughtered for being homosexuals every day.

    Also, "human life" is a relative, nebulous term in the case of abortion. It's why there's an entire debate on the definition of "conception" and "when does life begin?"
    Not sure what the first statement has to do with it. Homosexuality in and of itself is not an action that involves a human life being taken. What you describe is the barbaric punishment doled out for homosexuality in the Middle East, and not homosexuality itself.

    Those other questions don't really matter with the point I was making. If someone believes abortion is a human life being taken, I would expect them not to view it as a personal choice. They would, and should, view it as fighting to protect human life.

  16. #9676
    HNIC BSBH Legend
    Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    77,679
    Rep Power
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by rmc51 View Post
    This is not a good argument. If someone believes an act is truly murder, you cannot expect them to not have problems with letting it go as a "personal decision". I would have a problem if someone said it was murder and didnt fight for it.
    There are people that think cutting down a tree is murder.

  17. #9677
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    There are people that think cutting down a tree is murder.
    Or killing a cow. Or a chicken. Or an ant.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  18. #9678
    Just a Simple Country Squire BSBH Prospect
    Dunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    13,681
    Rep Power
    323
    Grant amnesty to 25+ million illegals, abolish electoral college, continue 3rd world, 85 IQ immigration policies, new populace votes imperpituity for Big Government, nanny state policies.....

    Become Brazil!

    Sounds like a recipe for success to me.

  19. #9679
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    I mean, in your world of "take what people say and crank the hyperbole to a thousand so it looks so much worse," sure.

    In reality, abolish the EC. Become a representative democracy that's actually representative of the will of the People.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  20. #9680
    Moderator BSBH Prospect
    Puck Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    North Pole
    Posts
    11,121
    Rep Power
    145
    Phil,
    This country was not founded on a policy of popular mandate for a reason.


    Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •