confirmed: Rangers Re-Sign Barclay Goodrow to 6-Year/$21.6M Extension; $3.6M AAV

Link:

 

Link:

Will Sports Group has it at $3.6AAV like previously reported. -- with a 15 team no trade.

 

 

6 years, 3.6M cap hit. 15 team NTC

Signing details:

 

As first reported by

@frank_seravalli

, #NYR signed F Barclay Goodrow 6 Yr $3.6M Cap Hit:

 

Yr 1: 750K Sal $1.75M SB

Yr 2: 2.5M Sal 500K SB

Yr 3: 5.1M Sal

Yr 4: 5M Sal

Yr 5: 3.75M Sal

Yr 6: 1.25M Sal 1.25M SB

15 team No Trade

I like the addition, it's just what they need, but I think it's a year or two too long and $600,000 - $1,000,000 too much. But, he was big depth piece on a team that won back-to-back Stanley Cups. He cashed in.

Signing details:

 

That's not terribly structured, I suppose.

Rather him at that price and length than Hyman who they apparently made an offer to as well. Good move.

Rather him at that price and length than Hyman who they apparently made an offer to as well. Good move.

 

Yeah, I didn't like what I was hearing regarding Hyman. That would have been an overpayment.

All in all, not a bad contract. It was needed. It was never coming dirt cheap. But it’s a good move.

Good. That's done, now let's get to the meat and potatoes.

I like it! Well done by Drury!! :thumbs:

Good. That's done, now let's get to the meat and potatoes.

 

I think that was the meat and potatoes. We're getting prime rib now, gents.

Very good signing!

Take it. Let's go!!

So now 3rd liners get 15 team no-trades?

 

Ok, so let's move on and let the next shoe (bomb) drop.

This is pretty shitty, but whatever. Hopefully he's effective for a couple years. I'll root for the player and not hold the contract against him. I'll hold that against Drury, who thus far seems more desperate and incompetent than our previous 2 GM's. He was a disappointment as a player here, so the same should be expected in this role.

Didn't expect to see a no-trade clause but whatever...those seem to be able to be worked around if necessary.

That's not terribly structured, I suppose.

 

do the signing bonuses hit in the year they are given or are they pro rated. if they hit in the year the back end becomes manageable.

As far as I know they are prorated.

He's a LW so I guess Bread drops to the 4th line.

This is pretty shitty, but whatever. Hopefully he's effective for a couple years. I'll root for the player and not hold the contract against him. I'll hold that against Drury, who thus far seems more desperate and incompetent than our previous 2 GM's. He was a disappointment as a player here, so the same should be expected in this role.

 

Desperate? What did he do to give that impression? Overpay Goodrow by 10%?

to me he's a fourth liner, therefore overpayed

So now 3rd liners get 15 team no-trades?

 

Ok, so let's move on and let the next shoe (bomb) drop.

 

Highly-sought after players get them, yes. A 15-team list isn't going to stop them from moving on if and when they decide to. The contract is structured to make him much more attractive for years five and six.

Desperate? What did he do to give that impression? Overpay Goodrow by 10%?

 

Sign him at all rather then developing this type of player considering the other young players we will have to pay. It's a waste of money but whatever, he and Dolan are exhibiting no patience. I'm half sure Drury is just a hand puppet at this point.

Sign him at all rather then developing this type of player considering the other young players we will have to pay. It's a waste of money but whatever, he and Dolan are exhibiting no patience. I'm half sure Drury is just a hand puppet at this point.

 

If developing a Goodrow were so easy Tampa wouldn't have traded a first for him and the Rangers wouldn't have been one of a number of interested parties in signing him.