Jump to content
  • Join us — it's free!

    We are the premiere internet community for New York Rangers news and fan discussion. Don't wait — join the forum today!

IGNORED

DeAngelo Reclamation Project: Close to Complete?


jsm7302

Recommended Posts

Part of why we have offense is because of ADA. He’s 5th in the entire league in d scoring. You want to improve our d? Get rid of Staal for sure and possibly Skjei since he’s leveled out and regressed. Get or develop an actual 2nd line center that plays both ways, let our D develop, and solidify a real checking line. Trouba has the tools takes that step into the shutdown D he is so you just have to trust it’ll happen. ADA and Fox become your real pp quarterbacks. Lindgren looks fairly solid. You hope some of the D like Miller coming up are real.

 

Finally you figure out for sure if Quinn is the guy for us. I’m not exactly seeing a real system from him sometimes and I wonder how much our defensive woes are from the coaching staff.

 

Agreed on Staal/Skjei. I think this team is 2 good LHD away from being really, really good. The left side defense is the most glaring weakness on the entire team.

 

As for 2C, I think Strome has shown to be capable of that for the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Agreed on Staal/Skjei. I think this team is 2 good LHD away from being really, really good. The left side defense is the most glaring weakness on the entire team.

 

As for 2C, I think Strome has shown to be capable of that for the next few years.

 

ADA and Fox aren't defensive specialists either, u know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have one of them in the system already in Matthew Robertson.

 

K'Andre has played LD too

 

Right. 2-3 years away if they work out, which is fine, but something like that needs to be kept in mind when making decisions about others. For example, do we re-sign Kreider now when he'll be 32 by the time our defense is more whole? If you re-sign Kreider, waiting 2-3 years for prospects that might or might not work out isn't good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd probably be an even bigger offensive threat on the left. Just look at him coming out of the box down the left side today. He'd see the whole ice from the point too. Just wonder how his D would be. The need to play a righty D on the offside is not common in a league where most teams are clamoring for more RD.

 

Yes. A lot of reign to be creative from the left side. This needs to be the direction, and I hope DeAngelo is game for it.

 

DeAngelo/Trouba please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeAngelo - Trouba

Skjei - Fox

 

Is that good enough long term? Im not sure.

 

Skjei in Seattle and Lundkvist/Miller on the 2nd pair might work tho.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

 

Don't think you can break up Lindgren/Fox. Solid.

 

If you flip DeAngelo to the left, I'm not sure where Skjei fits. I think the right move in that instance is to trade him. He's actually pretty decent offensively and another team that needs that kind of defenseman would like that. The Rangers don't need it with DeAngelo/Fox, and soon (hopefully) Lundkvist/Miller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends entirely on where he plays. He's the team's third-best RD. If he stays there, you're in Shattenkirk territory; paying an excessive amount of money to a player relative to his role. If he can shift to the left, the entire picture changes (for the better).

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk

 

That is what I meant. Move him over. He played the left in Junior, correct? Start moving him over now so we know it can translate to the NHL as well. May as well test it out before they commit to anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is what I meant. Move him over. He played the left in Junior, correct? Start moving him over now so we know it can translate to the NHL as well. May as well test it out before they commit to anything.

 

Yup. It's not inconceivable he could move over. It just means the Rangers' coaching staff need to be open to the idea of a right-handed defender on the left side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...