Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 81

Thread: Jimmy Vesey on the Block?

  1. #1
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473

    Jimmy Vesey on the Block?

    5. If Pavel Buchnevich and Tony DeAngelo represent players who seemed to respond to Quinn’s tough love, then what to make of Jimmy Vesey, who recorded one point — a goal — over the last 19 games?

    Other, that is, than it is more likely the Harvard product will be somewhere else rather than in Tarrytown when training camp opens in September.
    https://nypost.com/2019/04/08/ranger...site%20buttons
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  2. #2
    Senior Member BSBH Prospect
    ThirtyONE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    11,728
    Rep Power
    134
    Vesey sucks. He, Fast, and Namestnikov all do the exact same thing.
    GORTON 2020

  3. #3
    Russian Meddling BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    28,218
    Rep Power
    346
    One lazy-ass article, Larry.
    Lias Andersson for #AJT2019

  4. #4
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,788
    Rep Power
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by ThirtyONE View Post
    Vesey sucks. He, Fast, and Namestnikov all do the exact same thing.
    IMO, Fast is better than the other 2. Vesey and Namestnikov both need to go.

  5. #5
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Namestnikov is the best player of the group. He's also the most expensive. Two years from now, none of them should be on the team, however. They're all placeholders. Every single one of them. This is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  6. #6
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,788
    Rep Power
    86
    Namestnikov has been a huge failure here, I hope they can get rid of him during the off season.

  7. #7
    Senior Member BSBH Prospect
    So Nashty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,874
    Rep Power
    56
    I am good with getting rid of both Vesey and Names if the return is decent.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    rmc51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,078
    Rep Power
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by So Nashty View Post
    I am good with getting rid of both Vesey and Names if the return is decent.
    The return doesn't even matter. Getting back 6+ million in cap space is a good enough return for me.

  9. #9
    Senior Member BSBH Prospect
    So Nashty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10,874
    Rep Power
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by rmc51 View Post
    The return doesn't even matter. Getting back 6+ million in cap space is a good enough return for me.
    But both have decent value.. why wouldn't you wanna capitalize on that?

  10. #10
    Moderator Junior Division
    Future's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    7,619
    Rep Power
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR2711 View Post
    Namestnikov has been a huge failure here, I hope they can get rid of him during the off season.
    He's only a failure if you ever thought he was going to be a 40-50 player. He is the exact player he's always been, doing what he always does.

    As a bottom-6 forward, he's a good player to have, depending on the price.

  11. #11
    HNIC BSBH Legend
    Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    77,693
    Rep Power
    549
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    Namestnikov is the best player of the group. He's also the most expensive. Two years from now, none of them should be on the team, however. They're all placeholders. Every single one of them. This is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
    As long as they keep Strome.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Pee-Wee Division RangersIn7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Battle Creek MI
    Posts
    546
    Rep Power
    9
    Namestnikov won’t be here in a year, probably gone at the deadline as a rental. Only has a year left on his deal. He’s absolutely just a place holder. They took a 2 year flier on him at mid-range money. He’s not killing them, and it wasn’t a bad risk to take.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Slobberknocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    2 feet south of the blueline
    Posts
    4,507
    Rep Power
    45
    Vesey has been a disappointment. flip him if you can. if you can surround names with more talent he'd pay off. every team needs a fast, good intangible guy, better served for the 3rd or 4th line but can be moved up in a pinch or too give a top 6 guy a breather for a night.
    Acqua in bocca

  14. #14
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Kevin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    3,801
    Rep Power
    74
    I'd move on from Vesey. He's super inconsistent without any huge upside. And when he goes missing, he's not helping in any other area of the game.

  15. #15
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR2711 View Post
    Namestnikov has been a huge failure here, I hope they can get rid of him during the off season.
    By what standard? If you thought he was the point producer he was with Tampa (where he was riding shotgun to Stamkos), then yeah, but that's not who he *actually* is. He's a mildly productive third-line prototype who can play up and down your lineup in a pinch. On a rebuilding team, he's the exact type of player you want grooming young prospects who will, ideally, take his job over the course of a few seasons. Same with Fast.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  16. #16
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    As long as they keep Strome.
    Of that group of young veteran middle-six players — Strome, Vesey, Namestnikov, Fast — I keep Namestnikov over all the others. But ideally, none are around long-term. These aren't the kinds of players you invest years in beyond a handful of seasons. They're the ones you allow to groom your prospects into NHL players and then let sign regrettable UFA contracts with another team. Think Callahan.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  17. #17
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    rmc51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,078
    Rep Power
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by So Nashty View Post
    But both have decent value.. why wouldn't you wanna capitalize on that?
    Define decent value. A 4th round pick for either would be well received. A 3rd on Namestnikov if another team happens to have a liking for him.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Bantam Division LONG LONG LONG TIME FAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    NEVER NEVER LAND
    Posts
    2,096
    Rep Power
    11
    OMG. Where do people come up with some of this nonsense?? The chatter is just downright unbelievable. Life must be boring. as hell.

  19. #19
    HNIC BSBH Legend
    Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    77,693
    Rep Power
    549
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    Of that group of young veteran middle-six players — Strome, Vesey, Namestnikov, Fast — I keep Namestnikov over all the others. But ideally, none are around long-term. These aren't the kinds of players you invest years in beyond a handful of seasons. They're the ones you allow to groom your prospects into NHL players and then let sign regrettable UFA contracts with another team. Think Callahan.
    Strome is night and day better than Names.

  20. #20
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    87,036
    Rep Power
    473
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Strome is night and day better than Names.
    By what standard? I'm not trolling you. I'm legit asking.

    We both know where this is going to go, so let's get the obvious out of the way: he's a career 10% shooter shooting at more than double that (22.5) this season.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •