Well, unless someone comes in with an offer they can't refuse they'll be dealing him because they no longer believe he is the player they drafted at #7.
That is more or less the same as giving up on him in my book.
I also agree with Future that it is unlikely there is any value in dealing him right now.
"Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
- John Tortorella
"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
- Christopher Hitchens
He's 20, and doing fine in the AHL compared to his cohorts like Tolvanen, Necas, Raddysh, Jost, Yamamoto, Zadina, A Nylander etc
Lias Andersson for #AJT2019
Why not?
Recent draft pick with similar production numbers
Lias Andersson for #AJT2019
Yes, six years after he was taken tenth overall. If they moved him in 2011-12, you still think he's only getting Steven Kampfer and a conditional pick? I don't. GMs take on reclamation projects that aren't too far damaged, and change-of-scenery deals all the fucking time. They still do.
That same year, Grachev (drafted three years prior) got flipped (because he was rapidly approaching bust) for a third to STL, Nik Grossmann got flipped for a 2nd and 3rd, Hal Gill got a 2nd and two prospects, and Kyle Quincey got a 1st and a prospect.
"Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
- John Tortorella
"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
- Christopher Hitchens
First of all, Grossmann, Gil and Quincey were all actual NHL players themselves. Grachev got traded for a 3rd....which is a borderline NHLer.
Second of all, no, I don't think McI would have gotten much more than he did. He was drafted in 2010, then had a major knee injury/surgery in 2011 that cost him the 11-12 season. Nobody was going to trade for a guy coming right off of that injury, and the Rangers would have been dumb to cut bait after that injury anyways. Then, he never blew teams away in the AHL to rebuild that value. The return they got was the same they would have gotten in 2013.
I'll trade anyone, but to say was should trade Andersson now to for a 3rd round pick instead of a 6th round pick in 4 years sounds impatiently dumb for a team rebuilding.
Lias Andersson for #AJT2019
He's not on the market, but it is interesting to think what Andersson would bring in a trade right now in terms of a pick. My guess is a late first rounder (25+) or early second rounder. That means his development has not gone as hoped.
This is the thought process of fans that have never seen a rebuild.
Check out statistics of recent "late round picks". It's mostly miss, rarely hit.
People think getting a top 10 pick means someones going to come in and immediately turn the team into a contender. That's extremely unrealistic.
Look at the stats of other recently drafted players. He's right there were he should be, honestly. Most of the time you dont even see guys get NHL times their early in their careers. WE just want more.
Lias Andersson for #AJT2019
If you look at the players in that draft, there's no one who was really picked after him that's doing anything right now.
It's just a dog of a draft after the top 5 or so. We just missed the cutoff, it's the story of the Rangers.
Maybe, but I think it’s still too early to determine. We got spoiled with 2-3 drafts where players came in and made an immediate impact. Unfortunately, the Rangers didn’t have picks in those drafts! Going to take some patience. Get a few more 1st/2nd rd picks this season. Hopefully 1 or 2 can turn into great players, eventually. But it’s not going to be overnight.
Lias Andersson for #AJT2019
If Andersson were picked 21st and and Chytil 7th, we be thrilled with the top pick and be pleased with how the 21st pick was developing in the AHL..
Last edited by Flynn; 02-07-2019 at 10:39 PM.