Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 172

Thread: Doubtful Spooner is in Rangers' Long-Term Plans

  1. #21
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR2711 View Post
    How does Brooks know the style this team will play when they don't even have a coach yet?
    Bingo! How does Brooks even know how we are going to play or the players and mix the new coach wants? Or the skills he will emphasize, the variations he deploys or who fits for 2018-19 and/or the longer term?

    This is way too premature. We should take a step back and think more logically. Until we hire a coach, the roster construction will be minimal. Mgmt will begin to make some decisions on the RFAs and it could be a while before all the decisions are finalized. If there are RFAs they do not want long term those will be the players mgmt will be looking to trade this off season. Whether mgmt is able to and receive the value they want in return is a whole different discussion.

    Also consider that mgmt made the trades that included Spooner and Names, therefore they saw value in those assets and would never consider letting them expire. That has to be one of the most ridiculous things written since this rebuild began.

    Back to the OP on Spooner. So anyone paying attention is supposed to believe we acquired Spooner who then put up 16 points in 20 games and mgmt is disappointed? What did Brooks and mgmt expect? He doesn't fit on a coachless team that has many needs because he doesn't play a heavy game? Does Brooks think we didn't scout Spooner who is a known quantity, just entering his prime?

    His thesis makes no sense and should be completely dismissed.
    Last edited by Giacomin; 05-13-2018 at 12:52 PM.

  2. #22
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR Cafe Joe View Post
    100% correct. It'll take at least 3 years to see what Hajek and Howden have to offer and at least 5 years until we see what comes of the other 1st round pick.
    How Howden and Hajek turn out is a key measurement in judging the trade. We were able to scout them and traded for them. As for the picks? The picks are the picks. If it turns out that we make bad 1st and 2nd round selections that is on scouting/drafting and really is no longer a measure of the trade. Everyone knows there will be NHL talent in the entire first round this year and it is up to us to make a good selection or use the pick to improve other assets or areas of the team.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Pee-Wee Division
    jsrangers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    748
    Rep Power
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Giacomin View Post
    How Howden and Hajek turn out is a key measurement in judging the trade. We were able to scout them and traded for them. As for the picks? The picks are the picks. If it turns out that we make bad 1st and 2nd round selections that is on scouting/drafting and really is no longer a measure of the trade. Everyone knows there will be NHL talent in the entire first round this year and it is up to us to make a good selection or use the pick to improve other assets or areas of the team.
    Agree with almost everything you've said here on the issue in this post and others. The only thing I feel differently about is it's splitting hairs saying that if they blow the picks it's no longer a measure of the trade because that's on the scouts etc. It's the same front office/organization and if they piss away the picks it's still a factor in the return for some quality players we moved. The end result would be bad and that's all that matters.

    As for Brooks I wouldn't expect anything but crap most of the time, he didn't disappoint here.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by jsrangers View Post
    Agree with almost everything you've said here on the issue in this post and others. The only thing I feel differently about is it's splitting hairs saying that if they blow the picks it's no longer a measure of the trade because that's on the scouts etc. It's the same front office/organization and if they piss away the picks it's still a factor in the return for some quality players we moved. The end result would be bad and that's all that matters.

    As for Brooks I wouldn't expect anything but crap most of the time, he didn't disappoint here.
    So true, as far as evaluating mgmt, as a whole. Our ability to compete at the highest levels and the end results is all that matters.

    I don't mean to be splitting hairs, but only when it comes to evaluating the trade with Tampa (or any individual trade analysis) should we consider the pick we received, not the player we selected with the pick. We can't really evaluate the Tampa trade (a deadline deal not a draft day one) based on the idea that we took a bust and the next 3 picks were all quality NHL players. That just means good trade, horrible scouting and drafting.

    When running a big org it is important to be able to evaluate and LEARN what one does well and what we suck at, or somewhere in between. Sometimes conflating a whole bunch of issues, responsibilities and analysis' results in continuous bad assessments and decisions.

  5. #25
    Senior Member Pee-Wee Division
    Sod16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    682
    Rep Power
    22
    You never can judge a trade until some time down the road, but we were a little to anxious to make it, we showed our hand, and I think Tampa was able to take advantage of that. A package of McD and Miller should have gotten us a proven young stud defenseman, not a maybe in the future stud defenseman.

    At this early point, the Nash and Grabner trades look much better.

  6. #26
    HNIC BSBH Legend
    Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    77,336
    Rep Power
    532
    I think there's a good chance we over-valued McD.

  7. #27
    Very Large Member BSBH Prospect
    Vodka Drunkenski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    15,282
    Rep Power
    148
    Too many miles on McD
    Hidden Content

    Let's Go Rangers!

  8. #28
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,715
    Rep Power
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    I think there's a good chance we over-valued McD.
    I agree, he hasn't really done anything in Tampa either since the trade.

  9. #29
    Formerly Richter Redux Midget Division
    Ranger Lothbrok's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,535
    Rep Power
    115
    McDonagh was hurt when we traded him and had been trending downward steadily for three seasons. We definitely overvalued him. Just because you're the cream of the crop when that crop consists of a trash heap doesn't mean you're worth that to another team. McDonagh was a big fish in a small pond, and on any contender he's a big fish in an ocean filled with sharks.

    That said, I disliked trading Miller when we did, and I dislike it even more now. He wasn't "part of the problem," to me at least. He could've been part of the solution. JG wants to address toughness but trades the only forward other than McLeod willing to get his nose dirty? Yeah, makes sense.

    Until those locker room malcontent stories are substantiated, trading Miller was, still is and will be a bad move. Especially if the deal was in place without him and we tacked him on to get Namestnikov. That's even worse.

    All of this being said, don't sleep on Hajek. He has the ability to be as good, if not better, than Mac ever was.
    Hidden Content

    'Things aren't what they used to be' is the rallying cry of small minds. When men say things used to be better, they invariably mean they were better for them, because they were young, and had all their hopes intact. The world is bound to look a darker place as you slide into the grave. Joe Abercrombie, Best Served Cold.

  10. #30
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranger Lothbrok View Post
    All of this being said, don't sleep on Hajek. He has the ability to be as good, if not better, than Mac ever was.
    Well that would change everything. Wish I had that level of confidence. McD before the miles and injuries was a legit #1.

    Looking forward to seeing Hajek in Hartford. Howden, as well.

  11. #31
    a.k.a.Phildagoalie Junior Division
    Respecttheblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    9,687
    Rep Power
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Ranger Lothbrok View Post
    McDonagh was hurt when we traded him and had been trending downward steadily for three seasons. We definitely overvalued him. Just because you're the cream of the crop when that crop consists of a trash heap doesn't mean you're worth that to another team. McDonagh was a big fish in a small pond, and on any contender he's a big fish in an ocean filled with sharks.

    That said, I disliked trading Miller when we did, and I dislike it even more now. He wasn't "part of the problem," to me at least. He could've been part of the solution. JG wants to address toughness but trades the only forward other than McLeod willing to get his nose dirty? Yeah, makes sense.

    Until those locker room malcontent stories are substantiated, trading Miller was, still is and will be a bad move. Especially if the deal was in place without him and we tacked him on to get Namestnikov. That's even worse.

    All of this being said, don't sleep on Hajek. He has the ability to be as good, if not better, than Mac ever was.

    Love this post.

    I sure hope it was not Alain Vigneault's unhappiness with Miller that brought about the trade.
    I fugure they know something about him we don't, but that still doesn't stop me being pissed off about trading Miller, a hard nosed skill player, when we are a squad increasingly devoid of grit among the top-9 forwards. That said, I did not see much of the last Tampa series, so I have not seen much of how he has been playing in general, aside from an offensive highlight here or there.
    If n ya gots jowls, they might as well be furry ones.

  12. #32
    a.k.a.Phildagoalie Junior Division
    Respecttheblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    9,687
    Rep Power
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Giacomin View Post
    Well that would change everything. Wish I had that level of confidence. McD before the miles and injuries was a legit #1.

    Looking forward to seeing Hajek in Hartford. Howden, as well.
    Definitely looking forward to seeing those two and Yegor Whatsisname as well.
    Hoping we also get Shestyorkin worked into the team G platoon sometime soon, although part time duty may not be enough, so I guess I gotta be patient.
    If n ya gots jowls, they might as well be furry ones.

  13. #33
    Russian Meddling BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    27,755
    Rep Power
    335
    Quote Originally Posted by Respecttheblue View Post
    Love this post.

    I sure hope it was not Alain Vigneault's unhappiness with Miller that brought about the trade.
    I fugure they know something about him we don't, but that still doesn't stop me being pissed off about trading Miller, a hard nosed skill player, when we are a squad increasingly devoid of grit among the top-9 forwards. That said, I did not see much of the last Tampa series, so I have not seen much of how he has been playing in general, aside from an offensive highlight here or there.
    Miller was the epitome of the AV era.
    A guy that could do everything, yet tried to do nothing.


    And there is no chance AV had any say in the trades made at the deadline.
    Lias Andersson for #AJT2019

  14. #34
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by Respecttheblue View Post
    Definitely looking forward to seeing those two and Yegor Whatsisname as well.
    Hoping we also get Shestyorkin worked into the team G platoon sometime soon, although part time duty may not be enough, so I guess I gotta be patient.
    Call him Shesty and let him know he already has a nickname in NY. Yes, be patient, he has another year left in the KHL.

  15. #35
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Fatfrancesa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    1,437
    Rep Power
    35
    The problem isn’t trading miller it’s the seemingly rush to trade him for what seems to be an underwhelming return. There is no reason why they couldn’t move him at the draft or this summer. People are speaking of what it would take to move up in the draft. I would think miller and the 9 would be enticing. To me that’s is a better return than Namestikov.

  16. #36
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by Fatfrancesa View Post
    The problem isn’t trading miller it’s the seemingly rush to trade him for what seems to be an underwhelming return. There is no reason why they couldn’t move him at the draft or this summer. People are speaking of what it would take to move up in the draft. I would think miller and the 9 would be enticing. To me that’s is a better return than Namestikov.
    ^ That's it in a nutshell.

    It's obvious Mike had good info on this and the Rangers had decided to trade him. It seems one of two things happened based on listening to Yzerman and Gorton (among other involved) in interviews. Yzerman said, Gorton brought up JT well into the McD talks. Gorton responded in his presser that Yzerman had shown interest in JT, in the past.

    1. The team was in such a hurry to get him moved that they pushed to include him into the McD deal. It is easy to assume there were plenty of assets they wanted from Tampa and JT would increase the return.

    2. Or it was more specific. Very possible Gorton and Co wanted a particular asset or two and Yzerman was driving a hard bargain. Yzerman had interest in JT, so Gorton introduces JT into the equation thinking he will make a big difference. I speculate (based on things said afterwards) that Yzerman was very resistant on both Hajek and Foote. The inclusion of JT may have been necessary to get Hajek. They also needed to get an experienced forward back to trade Names. Thus, the Rangers obviously saw a bit of value in Names.

    Fatty, my problem is patience and strategic vision. Jt would have been a helluva a chip in the off season. More teams would be interested and bidding. He wasn't a pending UFA. However, I can see where the Rangers felt they were getting value by adding him to the deal. and moving the rebuild forward with expediency.
    Last edited by Giacomin; 05-15-2018 at 12:18 PM.

  17. #37
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Essentially, it is hard to determine how underwhelming the return is unless we know what the deal would have looked like with just McD. Obviously JT allowed Tampa to trade Names, but I'd guess there was something else. Maybe Hajek versus a lesser valued prospect. Or the conditional pick. Who knows besides mgmt?

    If it was what pried away Hajek and he turns into a top pair guy here, then the return becomes pretty damn good.
    Last edited by Giacomin; 05-15-2018 at 12:33 PM.

  18. #38
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Fatfrancesa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    1,437
    Rep Power
    35
    Yeah but mcd still has a year left too. The rangers were under no circumstances stuck into having to trade either. Tampa was the one trying to improve their cup chances. If mcd on his own can’t pry Hajek then yzerman should have been told to fuck off. If Holden is worth a 3 then mcd is worth a 30-31, a conditional 2, and two b prospects. Hajek is not a slam dunk prospect at all. He’s not even top 50. So I’m sorry but there was no logical reason why they had to make a move with those two players at the deadline. I’m ok with the return for mcd as the prospect and pick line of the deal. That leaves J.T. for Namestikov. Either the whole deal sucks or The J.T. part does. End result is that much like hagelin, Talbot, and raanta the return was weak.

    I’d be curious to what J.T. value is now? It’s hard to imagine if tampa made him available they wouldnt get a mid to late first back

  19. #39
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Kevin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    3,692
    Rep Power
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by Fatfrancesa View Post
    Yeah but mcd still has a year left too. The rangers were under no circumstances stuck into having to trade either. Tampa was the one trying to improve their cup chances. If mcd on his own can’t pry Hajek then yzerman should have been told to fuck off. If Holden is worth a 3 then mcd is worth a 30-31, a conditional 2, and two b prospects. Hajek is not a slam dunk prospect at all. He’s not even top 50. So I’m sorry but there was no logical reason why they had to make a move with those two players at the deadline. I’m ok with the return for mcd as the prospect and pick line of the deal. That leaves J.T. for Namestikov. Either the whole deal sucks or The J.T. part does. End result is that much like hagelin, Talbot, and raanta the return was weak.

    I’d be curious to what J.T. value is now? It’s hard to imagine if tampa made him available they wouldnt get a mid to late first back
    You're forgetting Howden, who is the better prospect in the trade. Also I think you're forgetting the whole letter and moving pieces to restart the team. They moved McD
    and JT because, in part, they didn't see them as part of the core moving forward. I'm not saying they necessarily got good value in the deal but I still think it's way too early to tell for sure.

  20. #40
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Fatfrancesa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    1,437
    Rep Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
    You're forgetting Howden, who is the better prospect in the trade. Also I think you're forgetting the whole letter and moving pieces to restart the team. They moved McD
    and JT because, in part, they didn't see them as part of the core moving forward. I'm not saying they necessarily got good value in the deal but I still think it's way too early to tell for sure.
    I’m not forgetting. Hajek was the target supposedly. Also I have no problem with trading them. They just didn’t have to do it by the deadline if the deal wasn’t right. We will see. Like I already said I’m on with mcd for picks and prospects, even b prospects which they are. Miller for Namestnikov will never make sense no matter the circumstances. Miller has/ had more value then that and would have fetched more st the draft.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •