Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 172

Thread: Doubtful Spooner is in Rangers' Long-Term Plans

  1. #1
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    86,616
    Rep Power
    463

    Doubtful Spooner is in Rangers' Long-Term Plans

    I doubt that Ryan Spooner fits into the Blueshirts’ long-term plan. The winger, reasonably productive but a bit too perimeter-oriented for a team that wants to transform into more of a straight-line attack mode, is also arbitration-eligible and a year away from free agency.

    To that end, it may be difficult to move Spooner, who went 4-12-16 in 20 games after coming to New York as part of the Nash deal, at the draft. The Rangers will have to decide whether to sign the winger for one year — probably for around $3.5 million — so he can be available as a trade-deadline rental or simply allow him to become a free agent by not qualifying him.
    https://nypost.com/2018/05/12/only-o...rs-would-work/


    Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  2. #2
    Russian Meddling BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    27,755
    Rep Power
    335
    I’d do 1 yr $3.5
    Lias Andersson for #AJT2019

  3. #3
    Senior Member Midget Division
    paddynyc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,153
    Rep Power
    23
    I'd go for the 1 year also and depending on where the Rangers are at the trade deadline you can always move him

    Sent from my [device_name] using http://Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile...ed by Tapatalk
    "Meet me later in the gymnasium, next to the dumbbells... you'll know me, I got a hat on."
    Curly

  4. #4
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Giacomin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    3,560
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil in Absentia View Post
    How dumb is that? Where does he come up with this shit? And his Spooner assessment just hit him today? Thankfully Brooks is not involved in our asset mgmt. Gotta write something I guess.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Junior Division
    The Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,297
    Rep Power
    76
    Ridiculous. I let Names go unqualified before I let this guy go. Good passers are needed in a North South style of play? WTF?

    Shit, I definitely think about trading Veseys rights soon because I am seriously thinking they shouldn't qualify him.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Fatfrancesa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    1,438
    Rep Power
    35
    Not a fan of either spooner or Namestnikov. Way to passive for the skill they provide

  7. #7
    //reported Junior Division
    phillyb™'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    9,570
    Rep Power
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
    Ridiculous. I let Names go unqualified before I let this guy go. Good passers are needed in a North South style of play? WTF?

    Shit, I definitely think about trading Veseys rights soon because I am seriously thinking they shouldn't qualify him.
    I was just wondering about this. Do clubs ever not qualify an RFA?
    LGR!

  8. #8
    a.k.a.Phildagoalie Junior Division
    Respecttheblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    9,687
    Rep Power
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Giacomin View Post
    How dumb is that? Where does he come up with this shit? And his Spooner assessment just hit him today? Thankfully Brooks is not involved in our asset mgmt. Gotta write something I guess.
    Unbelievable, the guy comes here and puts up 16 points in 20 games on a team where half the roster played like they were on 𝙻𝚒𝚏𝚎 support. I get he may be little perimeterish, but he can move the puck with skill and effectiveness...Id give him a looksee contract at least.
    If n ya gots jowls, they might as well be furry ones.

  9. #9
    The future is spelled K-A-K-K-O BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    86,616
    Rep Power
    463
    Quote Originally Posted by phillyb™ View Post
    I was just wondering about this. Do clubs ever not qualify an RFA?
    Yes. It almost never happens with quality ones, though. I'm no Namestnikov fan, but not qualifying him, or Vesey, or Spooner, is a non-starter in my court. That's just pissing away an asset. I'd sooner sign any of them to a one-year deal and trade them.
    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence."
    - Christopher Hitchens

  10. #10
    Senior Member Pee-Wee Division
    Sod16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    682
    Rep Power
    22
    Namestnikov went from playing on the first line of the best team in the league to the 4th line of a team playing out its schedule. He wasn't all that special before playing with superstars last season, and I'm not optimistic about him. Still, he is skilled must get a chance. If he's a total bust, the trade of McDonagh and Miller is going to look catastrophically bad. At my most pessimistic moments, I think of Namestnikov and Spooner as like a long procession of players who came and went in the dark seven non-playoff years.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Junior Division
    The Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,297
    Rep Power
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Sod16 View Post
    Namestnikov went from playing on the first line of the best team in the league to the 4th line of a team playing out its schedule. He wasn't all that special before playing with superstars last season, and I'm not optimistic about him. Still, he is skilled must get a chance. If he's a total bust, the trade of McDonagh and Miller is going to look catastrophically bad. At my most pessimistic moments, I think of Namestnikov and Spooner as like a long procession of players who came and went in the dark seven non-playoff years.
    When Toronto trades one of their young top forwards for a top pairing D man this summer, is when I completely lose my shit over the McD trade. I'm already underwhelmed on the return they got. If they could have gotten one of Marner, Nylander or even Kapanan in exchange for McD and Miller,....

  12. #12
    Senior Member BSBH Prospect
    ThirtyONE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    11,461
    Rep Power
    121
    We have a host of mediocre RFAs can’t keep them all.
    GORTON 2020

  13. #13
    Very Large Member BSBH Prospect
    Vodka Drunkenski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    15,283
    Rep Power
    148

    Doubtful Spooner is in Rangers' Long-Term Plans

    I love how some have already graded the McD/Miller trade disastrous and we haven’t even made either draft selection or seen either prospect yet.
    Hidden Content

    Let's Go Rangers!

  14. #14
    HNIC BSBH Legend
    Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    77,337
    Rep Power
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Vodka Drunkenski View Post
    I love how some have already graded the McD/Miller trade disastrous and we haven’t even made either draft selection or seen either prospect yet.
    Yea it's not making much sense to me.

    This team has no business selling players and picks for one guy like Nylander (who, btw is almost Nash-like in the playoffs) when we can acquire multiple picks and prospects instead.

  15. #15
    Junior Member NYR Cafe Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    0
    No reason why Spooner shouldn't be around next season unless the Rangers get a trade offer they can't refuse for him. Qualify him for one year, and if we're out of the playoffs trade him for the highest bidder. If we end up getting a 2nd rounder+ for Spooner, that will already make the Nash trade a win. A 1st, Lindgren and a year+ of Spooner and whatever he can get back in a trade? Pretty darn good!

  16. #16
    Russian Meddling BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    27,755
    Rep Power
    335
    Quote Originally Posted by NYR Cafe Joe View Post
    No reason why Spooner shouldn't be around next season unless the Rangers get a trade offer they can't refuse for him. Qualify him for one year, and if we're out of the playoffs trade him for the highest bidder. If we end up getting a 2nd rounder+ for Spooner, that will already make the Nash trade a win. A 1st, Lindgren and a year+ of Spooner and whatever he can get back in a trade? Pretty darn good!
    I fear the contract, honestly. I don’t want to see anything long term, and I want to avoid contracts in the 4-6m range (mediocrity is death - range).
    I wouldn’t mind him back, but I’d much rather use cap space for Kovalchuk or Tavares, if possible.
    Lias Andersson for #AJT2019

  17. #17
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Gravesy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,582
    Rep Power
    61
    The Mac/JT trade can’t be judged on Namestnikov’s performance.
    It’s a good couple of years until we have any idea whether it was great, shit or somewhere in between.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Bantam Division LONG LONG LONG TIME FAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    NEVER NEVER LAND
    Posts
    2,067
    Rep Power
    11
    ^^ Don't need a couple of years. The so-called trade, gave Tampa 2 starters and the NYR got back another joke of a much hyped player. Ridiculous as is the article by Brooks. Why publish that crap on a forum, I ask?

  19. #19
    Formerly Dru23 BSBH Prospect
    NYR2711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    West Babylon
    Posts
    13,715
    Rep Power
    86
    How does Brooks know the style this team will play when they don't even have a coach yet? I would re-sign Spooner for a year and see what he can do here for a full season. He is a guy that can play either wing or center, so it doesn't hurt keeping a guy that can lay like that around.I liked his play those couple of games here, so Id like to see what he can do here for a full year. If he is a bust, we can cut ties with him at the end of the season.

  20. #20
    Junior Member NYR Cafe Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gravesy View Post
    The Mac/JT trade can’t be judged on Namestnikov’s performance.
    It’s a good couple of years until we have any idea whether it was great, shit or somewhere in between.
    100% correct. It'll take at least 3 years to see what Hajek and Howden have to offer and at least 5 years until we see what comes of the other 1st round pick.

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •