Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 101 to 103 of 103

Thread: What the Lightning’s Success Says About the New York Rangers

  1. #101
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Long live the King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,201
    Rep Power
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Right, except it seems right now like you're pivoting to defend your point but that doesn't change his...We got a retiree and they got a player who's got something to give.
    How am I pivoting? We traded for a more productive player. Both had another year left on their deal. Neither team expected to resign the player in free agency. Both teams traded for two years of a star player, except McD was regressing at the time of the trade and Marty was a point per game player. Yes, its early to judge and McD is younger and has a better chance of rebounding next year, but currently our trade for Marty has worked out better for us than Tampa's trade for McD has worked out for them.

    If Tampa fails to win the cup next year, their trade for McD is worse than our trade for Marty. Was that not his point? That our trade for Marty was bad and their trade for McD was good?

  2. #102
    HNIC BSBH Legend
    Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    75,423
    Rep Power
    489
    Quote Originally Posted by Long live the King View Post
    How am I pivoting? We traded for a more productive player. Both had another year left on their deal. Neither team expected to resign the player in free agency. Both teams traded for two years of a star player, except McD was regressing at the time of the trade and Marty was a point per game player. Yes, its early to judge and McD is younger and has a better chance of rebounding next year, but currently our trade for Marty has worked out better for us than Tampa's trade for McD has worked out for them.

    If Tampa fails to win the cup next year, their trade for McD is worse than our trade for Marty. Was that not his point? That our trade for Marty was bad and their trade for McD was good?
    To be honest it's totally impossible to say that the trade for St.Louis was better than the trade for McD. How did it work out better for us than it did for them? We didn't win. They didn't win. That's a silly argument.

    The point is, we got a player we knew probably only had a year left. They're getting a player that has far more in the tank regardless of if he's a star or not. We gave up a lot of assets for a year-and-a-half of MSL. They gave up assets for what could probably be the rest of McD's career.

  3. #103
    Junior Member Gump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Orange, Texas
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0

    it was the person general manager

    Quote Originally Posted by Niko View Post
    While I know Tampa hasn’t hoisted the cup, this article raises interesting questions. If all of these players were still current rangers, where do you think we’d be as an organization? Was it the roster, the coach or the culture of the team that had the biggest impact on always being a bridesmaids and never a bride?

    http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/lightn...-york-rangers/

    “Meet the guys who have been around, been there, done that. They've been to a Cup final, been to a conference final, been most any place but the top. Girardi has played in 132 playoff games. McDonagh has played in 106. Stralman has played in 97. Think that doesn't help? Think that doesn't matter?”
    Trade Callahan (young with a bright future) for St Louis (old has has been). Let go free agents and then give up. Why does every one blame AV. Talent gone, best player out with blood clots, then have gm totally give up. Front office should have been fired not AV.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •