Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Oilers gearing up to "sell well below market value" on Ryan Nugent-Hopkins

  1. #1
    #MakePetrGreatAgain BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    82,376
    Rep Power
    366

    Oilers gearing up to "sell well below market value" on Ryan Nugent-Hopkins

    This in from hockey commentator Justin Cuthbert of Yahoo Canada Sport, his critique of the Stanley Cup prospects of the Edmonton Oilers and their coming cap issues: “Leon Draisaitl’s contract reveals two certainties for the Edmonton Oilers: 1) This upcoming season might be their best chance to win the Stanley Cup; it’s the last before McDavid’s contract moves from six figures to eight, and it will feature the greatest overlap in terms of young talent reaching their prime and veterans clinging to theirs. And 2) because Lucic’s contract is essentially bullet proof, Draisaitl could force Nugent-Hopkins even beyond the third line role he seems slotted for, and off the roster completely. This would continue the dangerous cycle in Edmonton of paying the premium while selling well below market value.”
    http://edmontonjournal.com/sports/ho...nugent-hopkins

    There's an interesting full breakdown from Staples at the link.
    Hidden Content

    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "I've always said, I'd rather tame a tiger than paint stripes on a kitty cat."
    - Dean Lombardi


    "Don't take refuge in the false security of consensus, and the feeling that whatever
    you think you’'e bound to be okay, because you're in the safely moral majority."

    - Christopher Hitchens

  2. #2
    Very Large Member BSBH Prospect
    Vodka Drunkenski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    13,745
    Rep Power
    112
    This is exactly what the Rangers need to jump on
    Hidden Content

    Let's Go Rangers!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Valriera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,572
    Rep Power
    34
    What you do here is sell Nash for futures and then flip those futures to EDM for RNH. It's a win win win for three teams involved. We need a center, EDM is going to need cheap and young talent to supplement their two centers, and whomever accepts Nash presumably needs a winger. I think you can get enough picks for Nash to flip for RNH, but that's the uncertain part imo.

  4. #4
    List Maker BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    21,899
    Rep Power
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Valriera View Post
    What you do here is sell Nash for futures and then flip those futures to EDM for RNH. It's a win win win for three teams involved. We need a center, EDM is going to need cheap and young talent to supplement their two centers, and whomever accepts Nash presumably needs a winger. I think you can get enough picks for Nash to flip for RNH, but that's the uncertain part imo.
    If they make a move for RNH, it'd be to win, and they'd need Nash for that. We need to add to the depth, not deplete it more.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Valriera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,572
    Rep Power
    34
    Well if you think that the move is for the purposes of winning, then sure. I don't think that though.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Bantam Division
    Long live the King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,136
    Rep Power
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by josh View Post
    If they make a move for RNH, it'd be to win, and they'd need Nash for that. We need to add to the depth, not deplete it more.
    It'd be a lateral move. Taking from our strength at wing to improve our weakness at center. 1 for 1 not depleting our overall depth, but making us overall more balanced. We'd need to moved Nash's $$$ to fit RNH anyway...

  7. #7
    List Maker BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    21,899
    Rep Power
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Valriera View Post
    Well if you think that the move is for the purposes of winning, then sure. I don't think that though.
    They didn't sign shattenkirk and Smith to not win.

  8. #8
    List Maker BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    21,899
    Rep Power
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Long live the King View Post
    It'd be a lateral move. Taking from our strength at wing to improve our weakness at center. 1 for 1 not depleting our overall depth, but making us overall more balanced. We'd need to moved Nash's $$$ to fit RNH anyway...
    We don't need lateral moves (even though it's depleting our wings). We need to improve. Plus, moving Nash's contract for RNH's only complicates things next offseason.

  9. #9
    Moderator Junior Division
    Future's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Valriera View Post
    What you do here is sell Nash for futures and then flip those futures to EDM for RNH. It's a win win win for three teams involved. We need a center, EDM is going to need cheap and young talent to supplement their two centers, and whomever accepts Nash presumably needs a winger. I think you can get enough picks for Nash to flip for RNH, but that's the uncertain part imo.
    Flipping Nash for RNH is a massive loss for the Rangers.

  10. #10
    Very Large Member BSBH Prospect
    Vodka Drunkenski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    13,745
    Rep Power
    112
    Sell well below market value...bag of pucks, done deal
    Hidden Content

    Let's Go Rangers!

  11. #11
    #MakePetrGreatAgain BSBH Legend
    Phil in Absentia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    82,376
    Rep Power
    366
    Quote Originally Posted by Future View Post
    Flipping Nash for RNH is a massive loss for the Rangers.
    Agreed. Frankly, I don't even want RNH.
    Hidden Content

    "Everyone says you should be a good loser. If you’re a good loser, you’re a loser."
    - John Tortorella


    "I've always said, I'd rather tame a tiger than paint stripes on a kitty cat."
    - Dean Lombardi


    "Don't take refuge in the false security of consensus, and the feeling that whatever
    you think you’'e bound to be okay, because you're in the safely moral majority."

    - Christopher Hitchens

  12. #12
    Moderator Junior Division
    Future's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    112
    What do people really think the market for RNH is?

    He's a guy who doesn't perform up to his contract and isn't even a lock for 20 goals. Considering the amount of money against the cap it would save EDM, something like Holden and a third should do it. The guy has incredibly low value. Eberle went for freaking Ryan Strome.

  13. #13
    List Maker BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    21,899
    Rep Power
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Future View Post
    What do people really think the market for RNH is?

    He's a guy who doesn't perform up to his contract and isn't even a lock for 20 goals. Considering the amount of money against the cap it would save EDM, something like Holden and a third should do it. The guy has incredibly low value. Eberle went for freaking Ryan Strome.
    other than this past season, hes put up better offensive numbers than Zibby, is 100x better at defense than him, faster, better hands, plays in all situations

    hes young, fast, still has untapped offensive potential, been around long enough to understand the game, and hes a very good 2-way player.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Junior Division
    The Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,108
    Rep Power
    45
    Hayes and Holden. That's all I pay for him. Works for them and for the Rangers. Never been a huge RNH guy, but he's better than their current options.

  15. #15
    List Maker BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    21,899
    Rep Power
    183
    Give up Hayes?
    We're practically in the same spot as we are now, with a higher cap hit.

  16. #16
    a.k.a.Phildagoalie Junior Division
    Respecttheblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    9,487
    Rep Power
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by josh View Post
    Give up Hayes?
    We're practically in the same spot as we are now, with a higher cap hit.
    I'm with Josh on this one. Some other piece than Hayes.
    And I don't see RNH's face off % getting better.

    As underwhelming as his playoffs were, I'd still like to see more of Hayes. I may be wrong, but I still think we can develop a better playoff performer than what we've seen.
    Last edited by Respecttheblue; 08-24-2017 at 09:49 PM.
    If n ya gots jowls, they might as well be furry ones.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Midget Division
    Kevin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    2,741
    Rep Power
    41
    Hayes is arguably better than RNH. I think RNH lacks heart. He would instantly be the player that would earn the most derision from the fans if we dealt for him.

  18. #18
    List Maker BSBH Rookie
    josh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    21,899
    Rep Power
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
    Hayes is arguably better than RNH. I think RNH lacks heart. He would instantly be the player that would earn the most derision from the fans if we dealt for him.
    Well, I think that would depend on what we trade for him. Like myself, I think most fans want to keep Kreider, Hayes, Miller and Buch to see what they could be. zibby, Zuccy, skjei, McD, HL aren't leaving. Shattenkirk, Smith, DeAngelo and Fast just signed. Nash already said no go to Canada.

    We give up Holden, prospect & pick and maybe they retain a bit...
    Once people realize he's a solid contributor and good two way guy, and not a dangerous offensive #1 pick, then they'd appreciate him.

    I honestly think he'd have a good skill set to gel with some of oor guys, and Z-RNH-Hayes is something I like. It's a good option... if the price is right

  19. #19
    //reported Junior Division
    booze and wingz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    7,750
    Rep Power
    58
    I've been thinking about RNH for a few weeks and ended up watching some highlights on YT for him. I could see the Rangers taking a gamble on this guy. This organization doesn't shy away from reclamation projects and RNH might be another project for us. With that being said, I really don't know too much about the guy. Is he a good skater?

    I could see Zib on the top line and then Hayes and RNH bouncing between lines 2 and 3. This relegates DD/Andersson/Nieves to the fourth line to battle it out for minutes, which is a better center-core than Zib/Hayes/DD/Andersson/Nieves.
    Out: Girardi, Klein, Stepan, Raanta
    In: Shattenkirk, Desharnais, Pavalec, DeAngelo/Bereglazalov/Pionk

  20. #20
    Moderator Junior Division
    Future's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by booze and wingz View Post
    I've been thinking about RNH for a few weeks and ended up watching some highlights on YT for him. I could see the Rangers taking a gamble on this guy. This organization doesn't shy away from reclamation projects and RNH might be another project for us. With that being said, I really don't know too much about the guy. Is he a good skater?

    I could see Zib on the top line and then Hayes and RNH bouncing between lines 2 and 3. This relegates DD/Andersson/Nieves to the fourth line to battle it out for minutes, which is a better center-core than Zib/Hayes/DD/Andersson/Nieves.
    RNH, as a player, is almost a no-brainer for this exact reason.

    The cost makes it tricky, but he'd be a great fit in this lineup. High upside with potential to play on a top line but the talent to exploit other teams' depth issues if he's on the third line.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •